Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Caught at 157mph, driver said he was 'emotional'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 March 2003, 04:51 PM
  #31  
Freak
Scooby Regular
 
Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: JFK/LHR
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Mr nagata was caught at circa 130mph..... the video evidence still in the car showing the speedo (and the stack recall) showing 197mph was there but they didnt actually catch him at that speed.

Old 20 March 2003, 04:52 PM
  #32  
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Steve001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

wish i had'nt mentioed the ABS bit now

what i was trying to get at is the official figures for stopping distances are a load of cr%p

there are some cars out there that can go 0-60mph and come to a stop in less time than it takes me to type this

if i remember a mag feature a while back the EVO Extreme came to a halt from 100mph in about 2.5 seconds

(no comments pls on my typing speed)
Old 20 March 2003, 06:03 PM
  #33  
Phil Harrison
Scooby Regular
 
Phil Harrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mid-Kent
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

We can do some simple calculations.....

A decent stopping time from 60mph(88 fps) is 3.3 seconds. Using v=u+ft, that gives a deceleration of 27 fps2. (check - the theoretical maximum is 32fps2).

From 150 mph (220fps) and a deceleration of 27fps2, using v2=u2+2fs the stopping distance is almost exactly 300 yds (896 ft)

If an EVO can stop from 60 (not 100!!!) in 2.5 secs, then it's decelerating at the theoretical maximum of 32 fps2, and the sums come out at almost exactly 700 ft, or 230 yds from 150.

(v2 = v-squared etc.... can't use superscripts)

Back-of-envelope only!!!! Tends to confirm the article as to likely stopping distance.....

FWIW

Phil
Old 20 March 2003, 09:34 PM
  #34  
bashful
Scooby Regular
 
bashful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

FWIW, I suggested at the time of the Top Gear test that the critical factor might have been that it was a TVR. I remember that the camera didn't flash at all, not that it flashed and didn't get a second picture on the marks. I wonder wether it's because the Trev is largely fibreglass, and doesn't give a good radar return at high speed. What with it being black... military technology, Mr. Wheeler?
Old 20 March 2003, 10:30 PM
  #35  
urquat
Scooby Regular
 
urquat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

got the video of nag on my servers.. when i find it i'll post the url.
Old 21 March 2003, 12:08 AM
  #36  
londonpaul
Scooby Regular
 
londonpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

ok - probably a naughty question - but are you really telling me that you've never driven your subarus at their top speed? really? surely you have
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
Jamesh10
General Technical
3
01 October 2015 11:56 PM
InTurbo
ScoobyNet General
21
30 September 2015 08:59 PM
LSherratt
Non Scooby Related
20
28 September 2015 12:04 AM



Quick Reply: Caught at 157mph, driver said he was 'emotional'



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:34 PM.