Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

432 BHP on standard internals :- )

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 07:21 PM
  #31  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Smile

The 'blips' at 3500rpm I presume to be slip ? The kink as it approaches peak torque at 5700rpm is also slip I believe.
Switch from low to high is at 4300rpm. I need a 'proper' boost controller to iron out the notch that occurs due to the wastegate slamming shut then opening again as it switches over !

Also notable is the power is still rising as it is shut off at 7000 rpm !



Old Feb 3, 2003 | 11:31 PM
  #32  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

When you say rebuilds do you mean upgraded internals ?
Yes I am all to aware that your car is made from OEM parts so all credit to you

Correct me if I am wrong but Christians 1bar was not through choice, it was as much as it could provide in the (short) time given for run up.
I understand this was nothing to do with lag - every time it hit one bar, the Samco inlet pipe collapsed due to the vacuum level and the gasflow significantly tailed off - that was in a previous life of course - it has all changed now

Trout
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 11:55 PM
  #33  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Post

Trout

I thought you meant at WL4 that the 1 bar boost was being achieved, (that was before Christian posted his data)
Of course now I'm confused how the power is not higher with that level of boost on a 2.5 ?
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #34  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Post

Hi Christian: I know that you are very happy with the car on the road and obviously it can pull more boost than on the rollers, but now that I have seen your power figures for both Well Lane and Power Engineering, then like Andy, I am wondering why they are a little low in comparison to the latest 2 litre performers.

Is the turbo properly matched to your 2.5 engine ? Are you running the same turbo and headers ?
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 01:43 AM
  #35  
pat's Avatar
pat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Post

Simon, where the hell has the delete function disappeared to?

[Edited by pat - 2/4/2003 2:51:28 AM]
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 04:48 AM
  #36  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Thumbs up

Compressor map looks appropriate Should support 500bhp/450lb-ft at 1.6 mid and 1.4 held on a 2.5Ltr
I 'presume' the turbine and housings are also properly matched ? If so, where's the power gone ??
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 08:24 AM
  #37  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Post

AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHH

I've finally had enough.

Enough crap, enough insults disguised as banter, enough power claims, enough excuses for no power.

I'm going to buy a Nova

Paul

Old Feb 4, 2003 | 09:46 AM
  #38  
colin c's Avatar
colin c
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
From: Southampton, 12.7 1/4 mile purple Scooby
Post

Paul,

If your going to buy a Nova there was a guy on here recently who could do sub 11 sec 1/4 miles in his, perhaps you could get the same spec as his and then you would know what a real performance car is

Could you also mail me a price for a set of 550cc injectors and also the adapters for phase 1 rails.

Andy I can feel you hitting 450 BHP soon and if you are ever coming down to PE let me know.

Cheers Colin
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 09:47 AM
  #39  
brickboy's Avatar
brickboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

LOL @ AndyF: "low boost setting drops it to 375bhp".

Now that's just rubbing it in!!!

Awesome power!
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 10:20 AM
  #40  
siwrx's Avatar
siwrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Post

andy or christian, what are you running to get those power figures from standard internals. ie what mods to your car

cheers
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 11:26 AM
  #41  
R19KET's Avatar
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Post

Andy,

It's quite simple really. If you use the same calculations to "estimate" Christians power, based on engine capacity/RPM/boost, as you do for the compressor maps, you'll see why he's getting the results he's getting.

Then you can do the same for the 1.8bar Christian said it was holding on the road.

Paul, I'm with you

Mark.



Old Feb 4, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #42  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Post

Andy

Fascinating thread to read. Congratulations, I take my hat off to you. Looking forward to seeing how far you can get it.

Les
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #43  
MorayMackenzie's Avatar
MorayMackenzie
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Cool

Harvey,

RE your question: "Christian" ... "I have seen your power figures for both Well Lane and Power Engineering, then like Andy, I am wondering why they are a little low in comparison to the latest 2 litre performers."

It occurs to me that one thing that I haven't seen talked about very much with regards to these engines is compression ratio. Changing the C/R would certainly affect the engines power output characteristics. Are all the 2 Litre cars you are comparing to Christian's 2.5 running standard compression ratio? If not, what compression ratios are they running?

These 2L beasts are producing very impressive figures, especially Andy's OE parts special. I am just guessing that the C/R may have been changed from standard in some of these motors, and this may in some way help to answer the question you posed above.

Cheers,

Moray
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 02:15 PM
  #44  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Post

it is quite obvious that cars are driven on roads/tracks and not at rolling dynos ..... so why don't you guys go the old fashion way and go to the pod or a track with a decent straight, or some "non public road" and do some launched starts, rolling starts, etc.

Old Feb 4, 2003 | 06:44 PM
  #45  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Smile

andy or christian, what are you running to get those power figures from standard internals. ie what mods to your car
Si, I think you will find Christian is not on std internals....lol

My engine spec

Sti 4 pistons
STi head gaskets
2" Scoobysport uppipe
Twin dump Falkland downpipe
3" Jetex system
K&N filter and direct feed
Front entry WRX inlet manifold
550cc Mazda RX7 injectors
Parallel feed fuel supply
FSE fuel regulator
Lateral performance uprated fuel pump
FMIC (pace cores)
Minor head porting
Standard WRX cast headers ported
Standard WRX closed deck block
Standard WRX cams
Standard WRX rods and crank
Standard WRX ECU
Standard WRX turbo with bolt on 20G wheel and cover

Approx £1600 would cover the parts fitted but not my time !!!
£3.70 per bhp

cheers

Andy
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 07:24 PM
  #46  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Unhappy

Is also with Pavlo.

Scoobynet was fun - now it is just snidey crap.

Trout
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 08:56 PM
  #47  
Deep Singh's Avatar
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Post

Andy,I'm sure you've mentioned this before but what type of engine management are you using?
David(Trout),I d'ont think people are being snidey but their knowledge/hard work has been used without acknowledgement.They also run businesses and so are'nt prepared to share all their 'secrets'.I think thats fair.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #48  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Angry

.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 11:00 PM
  #49  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Smile

Deep - I still have the original standard ECU in the car.

With the assistance of Pavlo we are hoping to have a suitable remap for it shortly.

PS What is everyone getting so upset about I certainly have no secrets on here, I regularly post my latest findings.

I also can understand and respect why those with a commercial interest are not so free with their information.

If someone spends a 'LOT' of time and money and doesn't get the results intended then is it a sin to try and help identify the reasons ?

Andy
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #50  
Adam M's Avatar
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Post

Andy, I think people are upset by the underhanded comments aimed at insulting others, rather than just coming out with it.

I completely agree with those getting upset.

this is nothing to do with secrets, just the way people are choosing to have a pop at eachother. I am one of the youngest here, but it seems many others are far more capable of rekindling their playground days.

I wish people would reme,ber that we are all enthusiasts here, some making a living from it and some not, but all after the same goal, ie bettering our cars and enjoying them at the same time.

I cant believe so much of the scene has become so personal and the them and us menatlity that has been forming is really pathetic.

I am seriously losing interest in posting on here as a result.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 11:43 PM
  #51  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Post

Adam - You've got mail.......
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 12:37 AM
  #52  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Post

Hi Steve

The front entry manifold will not give any more power, I'm of the opinion that it reduces lag slightly due to the shorter pipe runs to the FMIC, others disagree.

I have a spare TD05 but I'm using it to experiment with turbine set ups on my own car at the moment. They can generally be had in good condition for under £200 from a breakers but will need either a 16g front entry cover to suit your car (£70 ish) or a 20g upgrade kit (£300 ish) if you are aiming for over 400bhp

If you're in the states, you could pick up a brand new TD05 for US$675 ! A brand new 20g hybrid like my one will set you back approx $900. Just need to convince them it's not a bomb in your case

If you're interested, let me know and I'll give you the part numbers

cheers

Andy
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 12:50 AM
  #53  
steve McCulloch's Avatar
steve McCulloch
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Post

Andy

Thanks.... USA.. back Thursday.. land on the Friday! so I can attend the RR day at PE.. on saturday!

Sorry you lost me ... what is 16g or 20g??...- is this like sending your turbo to Turbo Dynamics for a modification?? or is this a fitting type kit

Part no's that would be excellent.. e/r on tourist amount is $1.60.. and a little higher on c/c.. (with Nationwide!).. may be even better if they start a war.. should go to about $1.80!

Know any companies I can order from. Might be just as easy to order direct from Uk.. the US Airports are very, very strict about everything now so I dob turbo would get through.. although I would not want to pay duties, etc, either....

over 400bhp.. I want a turbo that can flow about 500bhp.. thats my aim.. then I can move on to another car......

I suspect the PE run may be a waste of time, as I have a smaller turbo and no headers on at the moment compared to Bob... will see just how restrictive the VF22md195 is.. that said it should be good for at least 400bhp...

Oh.. dont have time to go to breakers!...... sacrificies, sacrificies.. I dont have time to do anything to the car!!..... I am now starting to get very frustrated..... being over here in Illinios and Ohio.. have not come across any decent cars, except the Occasional GT2 911....



Old Feb 5, 2003 | 01:12 AM
  #54  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Wink

The 16g / 20g relates to some component sizes within the turbo. probably too much infomation for your thick scottish skull
Loosly translated they are 'go faster bits'
My current turbo I only rate to approx 460 bhp too small for you I guess ?
The upside of this is that there is 1 bar of boost available from 2800rpm which makes it very drivable and responsive. Depends what you want to use it for.

I'm not (yet) in a position to personally recommend a spec for a 500+ bhp turbo but I'm sure there are others who can.

cheers

Andy
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 10:22 AM
  #55  
ChristianR's Avatar
ChristianR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,329
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Post

Harvey,

" am wondering why they are a little low in comparison to the latest 2 litre performers."

You can already see that my torque figure is in another leagure compared to a 2litre. Bob was making 390ft/lbs at 2.2bar on the pe rollers. I was making 384ft/lbs at 1.4bar (peaking at 1.6) on the pe rollers.
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #56  
P20SPD's Avatar
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Unhappy

To Everyone

I believe that this thread has run its course, and as such am locking it.

Guys, i am really dissapointed by the bickering that seems to be going on on here at the moment, especially as it is predominantly coming from respected people.

If you dont change your stance, then i am sorry, but i for one will not respect you for your knowledge, which is very sad really. I am sure others will feel the same too.

Could we all just chill out, and continue to help others on this BBS, instead of hindering them.

Thank you

Steven
Old Mar 2, 2003 | 01:25 PM
  #57  
jonny gav's Avatar
jonny gav
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,920
Likes: 0
From: North East Subaru Forum
Smile

p20
you are a funny guy





[Edited by jonny gav - 2/3/2003 1:26:58 PM]
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 12:49 AM
  #58  
R19KET's Avatar
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Post

Andy,

I thought this may help with the speculation about Christians turbo.



To convert lbs/min air flow to CFM, divide by 0.069

Mark.

[Edited by R19KET - 2/4/2003 1:58:38 AM]
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 03:42 PM
  #59  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Thumbs up

I'm with Carlos here Roll up, roll up

Mark I wasn't having a dig. Just that a steel/forged internals 2.5 running an appropriate turbo and 1.4 bar held boost should be making MUCH more than 400 bhp by my calculations ? No ?
(Christian stated his car only held 1.6 bar on the road with a peak of 1.8)

Moray With the exception of Bob (who I have no info on) I do not think any of the 400+ 2.0 cars are running over 8.5:1 CR
My own car is running slightly less compression than std due to the sti pistons not protruding so far out the block.

[Edited by Andy.F - 2/4/2003 5:15:18 PM]
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 07:38 PM
  #60  
ustolemyname??stevieturbo's Avatar
ustolemyname??stevieturbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
From: Norn Iron
Post

Well, there is another bbs, although it is still viewed by others im sure, but doesnt get as many plonkers posting on it...
Perhaps some of these more interesting threads could be re-located there.

[Edited by ustolemyname??stevieturbo - 2/4/2003 8:39:29 PM]



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM.