Notices
Projects For Serious DIY Car Projects

DIY FMIC Project - condensed version ;o)

Old Oct 3, 2002 | 11:38 AM
  #61  
Adam M's Avatar
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Post

Pavlo,

marks fitted before the angle was changed and without the isc.

Its a moot point anyway as andy's has been sorted now.

jecs? personally I love it. Works better than most afterwamrkets, has all the standard features, and great idling etc. Just lack of adjustability that ruins it.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2002 | 03:57 PM
  #62  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Smile

JECS RULES Lack of adjustability means I tune my engine to suit the ECU's fixed maps as opposed to the conventional method of tuning maps to suit the engine
Just glad Mr Jecs was a top mapper
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2002 | 08:15 PM
  #63  
UkLegacyT's Avatar
UkLegacyT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Post

andy, got the stuff today thanks mate. havent got round to opening as only just got in. will mail you later.

cheers
ian.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 08:09 PM
  #64  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Question

Andy ..... got any news for us ?????

Carlos H.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 08:22 PM
  #65  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

He's on holiday
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 02:30 AM
  #66  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

ohh yeah.. and he will be upset! (not) at my figures... (proud hopefully!)
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 04:33 PM
  #67  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Post

David, you still have to modify your turbo inlet ..... so there should be more power left.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 04:26 AM
  #68  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Post

Andy since you are back could you post some more pictures

Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 08:54 PM
  #69  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Post

Will do Carlos Just as soon as I get the hol shots downloaded

The intercooler is up and running. Initial findings are that there is a substantial drop in charge temp less pressure drop across the cooler and more power at the top end of the rev band using less boost pressure however there is an increase in lag between shifts
Although I would swear by the seat o pants meter that the car is much faster, in reality the extra power is offset by the slight increase in lag. My AP22 shows my 0-100 time is now 0.2 secs slower
Attention to my dump valve set up, or rather lack of dump valve may help in this area. Removing the dump valve improved the response on the small TMIC. It may be that the increased volume of compressed air within the FMIC is having a greater effect on slowing the compressor ?
Further testing required
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 06:36 PM
  #70  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Post

.....
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #71  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Thumbs up

More piccies.......


Eng top




Pipes to/from I/C




Pipes to/from I/C




Turbo in/out




Front splitter was cut 2" deeper. Know any good painters !!




Header tank and FPR relocated out of harms way


Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 08:34 PM
  #72  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Post

nice pictures, and as always u have used a lot of imagination ..... have u retuned your JECS ECU with the software David W. is using ?

Carlos H.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 09:28 PM
  #73  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Smile

Thanks Carlos I still retain a totally standard ECU but I'm considering a set of bigger injectors and a remap, David's is certainly going well
I think a remap is well overdue on my car so I'm currently discussing it with Paul (Pavlo)
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 09:30 PM
  #74  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Post

Andy ..... YHM .....
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 03:01 AM
  #75  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

good painters... yes... I can do it for you if you can make it this way!.

David

Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 10:38 AM
  #76  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Wink

David

Do you use a roller or a brush
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 10:47 AM
  #77  
UkLegacyT's Avatar
UkLegacyT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Post

use a teabag to get the antique affect

ian
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 10:54 AM
  #78  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Post

Ian...Got any decent chargecoolers for sale swap you a big FMIC !! Can't get rid of that little bit lag Feels like I've fitted a bigger turbo which wasn't the intended result.
How you finding your car going now ?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 11:07 AM
  #79  
UkLegacyT's Avatar
UkLegacyT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Post

hi andy, how was the hols mate?

my car is going very well actually. out accelerates a friends 550 maranello up till about 80ish which is very pleasing considering the cost difference!

what i really like is the instant responce during after gear changes

have you had it on the rollers with your setup? certainly looks a very good job.

ian

tell you what i am impressed with...
when i had the old chargecooler, the water used to almost boil at some points, whereas this is just luke warm at most.

Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 11:19 AM
  #80  
UkLegacyT's Avatar
UkLegacyT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Post

have you measured the charge temps with the front mount? how do they compare?

ian

going to watch the cambrian rally in an hour, see what prey is out on the road sections
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 11:38 AM
  #81  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Thumbs up

Glad your happy with the C/C set up Think I may do a U turn and build a bigger C/C for my car to get the sharpness back
I've not had it on the rollers yet, the cooler charge air means I need more fuel so I'm maxing out my fuel system before 1.5bar where I could previously run to 1.8
I think my thermocouple must be broken it just doesn't seem to increase at all now !! 2-3 degrees above amb on average !
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 08:35 PM
  #82  
UkLegacyT's Avatar
UkLegacyT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Post

god i bet your pi55ed off now after building that fmic

was just wondering before, how have you routed the pipes from the ic? do they go under the water rad? cos on mine, under the rad there is a big sort of cross member in the way

Reply
Old Nov 2, 2002 | 11:18 PM
  #83  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

Injectors and ECU Andy or is that a bit too conventional? FMIC would be more reliable/stay up longer on track?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2002 | 12:51 AM
  #84  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Thumbs up

Yea, It's just another mod that at first seems to have been a backward step although I know theory supports the move, so I'll persevere till I get a result
As you state John, the main benefit will be on track.
More fuel, more timing, more boost required

How is your wideband John ?

Ian - Hoses under rad, same route as MRT FMIC. The lowest hose retains the same ground clearance as the sump/exhaust/rear diff
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2002 | 01:45 AM
  #85  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Post

Andy what are to thinking to improve the response when changing gears ..... anti-lag ..... ?

Carlos H.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2002 | 10:48 AM
  #86  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

WB - I am waiting for my turbo before I use it on my car much, but it does work and well, just quite a few boxes and wires. It will not be a permanent fixture.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2002 | 11:10 AM
  #87  
dhorwich's Avatar
dhorwich
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 0
Post

AndyF,

Have you thought about modifing a charge cooler from a celica GT4 or would it be to big...???? you get a charge cooler rad and pump with them too...!? they are pretty big though....

Could you not modify one of the two FMIC's into a charge cooler..???

Dan
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2002 | 01:05 PM
  #88  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Post

Pace cores are so cheap that I'd be better designing one from scratch. I've not looked at the GT4 CC in detail but from memory it's not much bigger than a Legacy unit ?
I'm going to persevere with the FMIC for now, I knew it was going to be a compromise in it's current format, it was designed with the higher flow from twin turbo's in mind..........still to do that
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2002 | 01:10 PM
  #89  
dhorwich's Avatar
dhorwich
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 0
Post

Will a remap e.t.c improve your lag low down..???? or is it down to the turbo and intercooler, your pipe work is still pretty good (short for a FMIC), i only say this from a basic point of view as i dont have any where near the knowlege as you lot, but when i fitted an induction kit the car seemed to lose a bit of low down grunt...??

keep us posted...!! its geart seeing these pics...!

Dan
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2002 | 01:23 PM
  #90  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Thread Starter
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Post

It's not lag low down, that's still ok, it's between gears I think the turbo is spooling down. My AP22 shows that the power after a gear shift sort of tapers in instead of Bangs in like it did with the CC.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 AM.