Estimated Power???
#132
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its the torque which is better IMo, thats what probably made David swear when we changed the exhaust. A word begining with F, when i booted it in 2nd, it wheelspun and squirmed away down the road. Would not do that before
I will try and get the overlays as best as possible, using excel, clearer image then.
Steven
I will try and get the overlays as best as possible, using excel, clearer image then.
Steven
#134
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WL 3 was peaking at 1.4bar and holding 1.25 per the defis (based on me watching them)
WL 5 was peaking at 1.3bar and holding 1.25 per the deifs (set to record)
Steven
WL 5 was peaking at 1.3bar and holding 1.25 per the deifs (set to record)
Steven
#135
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
can you email me both scans that you did???
Like you have been told size is un-important... (ie I can cope with the big uns...Not work add though)
David
Like you have been told size is un-important... (ie I can cope with the big uns...Not work add though)
David
#136
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
David, i have not scanned the second one in yet, scanner would not work, hence why it took me an hour to plot the points from paper into Excel.
Why do you want them?? Do not fully understand what your final bit means
Steven
Why do you want them?? Do not fully understand what your final bit means
Steven
#139
Sorry Steven, been away from the internet from &pm last night until now..
So new graph is slightly higher all over and a smoother graph.
Nice comparison.. new exhaust is a HKS Hyper (IIRC)?
Was the first graph on the Scoobysport? or the one inbetween?
JGM
So new graph is slightly higher all over and a smoother graph.
Nice comparison.. new exhaust is a HKS Hyper (IIRC)?
Was the first graph on the Scoobysport? or the one inbetween?
JGM
#140
I am trying to recall if your old system was 2.5" and your new one is a full 3"?.
if it is, it is good to see that you have not lost out low down with the larger bore.
strange torque curves, just as well you labelled them or you could read either as a power curve.
if it is, it is good to see that you have not lost out low down with the larger bore.
strange torque curves, just as well you labelled them or you could read either as a power curve.
#142
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Old system was SS 2.5" Downpipe, Magnex Centre with Resonator and SS Back Box.
New System is H&S 3" Downpipe, HKS Hiper Centre and Rear.
The car held boost on the rollers quite well, the only disappointing thing for me was when boost came in on the rollers, 1000rpm later than what it does on the road
Steven
New System is H&S 3" Downpipe, HKS Hiper Centre and Rear.
The car held boost on the rollers quite well, the only disappointing thing for me was when boost came in on the rollers, 1000rpm later than what it does on the road
Steven
#143
Well lane is crap for spooling, except on Davids car, where it hit mega torque real quick.
Very useful torque addition, circa 20ft-lbs in most of the on boost range, even with lower(ish) peak torque.
I would be so tempted to get it to hold 1.4bar, but then I have no fear (and it's not my car!)
And as T-Uk pointed out, no loss of low down torque with 3" exhaust system.
Paul
Very useful torque addition, circa 20ft-lbs in most of the on boost range, even with lower(ish) peak torque.
I would be so tempted to get it to hold 1.4bar, but then I have no fear (and it's not my car!)
And as T-Uk pointed out, no loss of low down torque with 3" exhaust system.
Paul
#145
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Steven
Just be done with it and fit a TD05 like Rich Wild has
Gain +13bhp and +23lb-ft torque and more importantly raise your torque at 3700 from 220 to 280 lb-ft for a "real" kick in the pants when you plant it midrange
Andy
Just be done with it and fit a TD05 like Rich Wild has
Gain +13bhp and +23lb-ft torque and more importantly raise your torque at 3700 from 220 to 280 lb-ft for a "real" kick in the pants when you plant it midrange
Andy
#146
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Andy, i am happy with the results of my car, does exactly what i want on the road. Interesting to note that Rich was running 1.5bar, and i only 1.3peak.
Definately dont want to run 1.5bar
I know Rich changed is exhaust, but hell there was one hell of difference between mine and his car.
There is still plenty left in mine at the moment, as it is running rich imo, but hey we will see.
i suspect that the on road torque is a lot different to the graphs above, but who knows, maybe i should buy, or perhaps BORROW, an AP22??
Steven
Definately dont want to run 1.5bar
I know Rich changed is exhaust, but hell there was one hell of difference between mine and his car.
There is still plenty left in mine at the moment, as it is running rich imo, but hey we will see.
i suspect that the on road torque is a lot different to the graphs above, but who knows, maybe i should buy, or perhaps BORROW, an AP22??
Steven
#147
ask JB nicely and he can give you AP22 logs of the max he could get from the MD304 v TD05.IIRC both turbos set to run similar boost,well as much as the MD304 gave before loosing power unlike the TD05 which gave more power with more boost.
#148
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont want to go to the TD05, as i have not started playing with the turbo i have. Besides, on the road, given i was down on power and torque compared to DW, i could pull away.
There is plenty left in my car as it is, with out pushing things to the level of Johns tuning abilities. Besides, the levels you and John are talking about, are not what i specified in selection criteria, way back in August & September.
I am happy as i am, thanks...
.... for now anyway. Think DW said, once i have driven his car, i will want more, given that he asked me to run it in for him, i have a horrible feeling i WILL want more. At that point i shall re-evaluate what I WANT and NEED from my car.
Cheers
Steven
There is plenty left in my car as it is, with out pushing things to the level of Johns tuning abilities. Besides, the levels you and John are talking about, are not what i specified in selection criteria, way back in August & September.
I am happy as i am, thanks...
.... for now anyway. Think DW said, once i have driven his car, i will want more, given that he asked me to run it in for him, i have a horrible feeling i WILL want more. At that point i shall re-evaluate what I WANT and NEED from my car.
Cheers
Steven
#150
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I wasnt driving.. and there was a very competent driver behind the wheel of my car.. did have to lift due to it detting, and I dont remember you 'Pulling away'
creeping away maybe.. was **** all in it though..
I do believe its faster now though..
David
creeping away maybe.. was **** all in it though..
I do believe its faster now though..
David