Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Is the EU falling apart?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 June 2017, 03:36 PM
  #271  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Both my mother and sister live in France now.

Apparently the locals are now more into doing up their old building themselves

As well as shoving up a new bungaloo
Not where we are located: 87, Haute Vienne, one of the less wealthy departments and not much work around, except in the larger cities, of which, Limoges.

If you find a doer-upper being done, 7/10 Brits, 2/10 Dutch, 1/10 German.

I don't know of ANY done up by French. Not within 20 miles of me, anyway, which area I know well.
Old 16 June 2017, 08:54 AM
  #272  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

https://getbritainout.org/why-the-uk...single-market/
Old 16 June 2017, 09:20 AM
  #273  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

lol, this boll0x has even been trashed by Brexiteers - over 3 months ago

http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=86417

the EU referendum blog is run the avid Brexiteers for the last 40 yaers

and even they think Burrage is talking nonsense

"In an extraordinarily botched effort, even by his standards, Michael Burrage has again produced a Civitas report, this one purporting to show that, for the UK in the forthcoming Brexit negotiations, "it's quite OK to walk away" from a deal. Trading under WTO rules, he asserts, "is an acceptable solution for the UK".

To reach this astonishing conclusion, Burrage has to undergo quite remarkable intellectual contortions, comparing the export performance of countries with bilateral deals to those which, he says, trade only under WTO rules.

The point, of course, is that his selection criterion for the supposed countries trading under WTO rules is flawed. Burrage assumes that any country that does not have what he calls a "bilateral trade treaty" with the EU (and he identifies 111 of them) necessarily trade only under WTO rules.

Manifestly, this is not true, and at two levels. Firstly, Burrage is imprecise in his use of terminology, referring to the term "bilateral trade treaty" when he actually means "regional trade agreement", specific types of trade treaties which parties notify to the WTO. Such treaties involve the reduction of tariffs and quotas and must encompass "substantially all trade".

Secondly, Burrage is working on the false assumption that such trade treaties are a binary issue – that in terms of trade, countries either enjoy regional trade agreements or they have no agreements at all and therefore trade only under WTO rules. In other words, Burrage posits an "all or nothing" scenario.

In fact, according to the EU treaty database, the EU has concluded 928 bilateral and 263 multilateral agreements with countries throughout the world, making 1,191 in total. Of these, 440 are trade agreements or deal with trade-related matters. "

and it goes on


the WTO option is a nonsense that only the thick or clinically insane regard as advantageous to the UK trading

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 16 June 2017 at 09:22 AM.
Old 05 July 2017, 03:20 PM
  #274  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ean-parliament

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politi...-panama-papers




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM.