Police cock-up.
25 November 2016, 01:15 PM
#31
Meanwhile, my insurance say that South Yorkshire Police are "dragging their feet" and SYP say the insurance company don't want to pay the fees...(what fees?)
Someone is supposed to ring me back tonight after 8pm, but I'll end up ringing her as I'm at the hospital for the results as to what the mass is on my pancreas.
And as far as she can see, SYP STILL have it recorded as my fault
If your insurance company are not willing to pay the £10 fee - then they will only have access to the limited information from the initial call, which will have your reg listed - which is probably why she is saying it is still down as your fault.
Sounds like you want to complain about you insurance company for not doing anything
26 November 2016, 02:37 PM
#33
Never said we are never wrong - that's why I advised you to complain before.
But we are often an easy target to blame when things don't appear to go their way - or when (insurance) companies don't want to pay their fee to get information they need for their investigation.
But we are often an easy target to blame when things don't appear to go their way - or when (insurance) companies don't want to pay their fee to get information they need for their investigation.
27 November 2016, 11:57 AM
#34
Or when you can't be bothered to investigate because the perp didn't have a bar-code you could photograph, use to identify him provisionally, and send him a letter demanding money with menaces? LOL
You KNOW I speak the truth.......
You KNOW I speak the truth.......
27 November 2016, 02:22 PM
#35
Eh? - you been on the sauce again!!!
It would appear that your insurance company can't be bothered to pay the fee to release the information they need to conduct their investigation. Seems a bit of a 'Mickey Mouse Company' that can't be bothered to pay a simple fee.
And what photograph? - You never mentioned there was a photograph of the accident, if so what was the reg on that? Perhaps you could send that to your insurance company.
It would appear that your insurance company can't be bothered to pay the fee to release the information they need to conduct their investigation. Seems a bit of a 'Mickey Mouse Company' that can't be bothered to pay a simple fee.
And what photograph? - You never mentioned there was a photograph of the accident, if so what was the reg on that? Perhaps you could send that to your insurance company.
Last edited by Felix.; 27 November 2016 at 02:23 PM.
27 November 2016, 05:58 PM
#36
One of us has been on the sauce: I said:
THAT'S why motorists are an easy target. But hey, you'll deny that too...apparently there are people out there who ring you continuously DEMANDING you persecute motorists and do fek all about loads of other stuff.
You know, like motorists....we all have a nice code you can record and charge us for any misdemeanours, don't have to move from your heated scam van, or heated office to demand money with menaces.
Unlike when folk get their garages broken into, and no-one even turns up.
Or when their kids get assaulted and they get TOLD where the crims are, one wielding a knife...but no-one turns up.
And you STILL wonder why you have lost the public's support...or deny you have, LOL.
Not so easy, you see.
And while I'm on it, what's this FEE for "releasing info"????????? Isn't that your job, to investigate and make sure it's all settled properly??????? Jeez we pay enough on our council tax.......
the perp didn't have a bar-code you could photograph, use to identify him provisionally, and send him a letter demanding money with menaces? LOL
You know, like motorists....we all have a nice code you can record and charge us for any misdemeanours, don't have to move from your heated scam van, or heated office to demand money with menaces.
Unlike when folk get their garages broken into, and no-one even turns up.
Or when their kids get assaulted and they get TOLD where the crims are, one wielding a knife...but no-one turns up.
And you STILL wonder why you have lost the public's support...or deny you have, LOL.
Not so easy, you see.
And while I'm on it, what's this FEE for "releasing info"????????? Isn't that your job, to investigate and make sure it's all settled properly??????? Jeez we pay enough on our council tax.......
Last edited by alcazar; 27 November 2016 at 06:00 PM.
27 November 2016, 07:52 PM
#37
Ah - i see you have spun it back to speeding again. Just don't go over the limit and you'll be alright. And no 'demanding money with menaces' if its not you, just say so or use due diligence. If it is you, why no just admit to what you have done. Still only about 1% of our contact with the public I'm afraid.
And like i said before - if your not happy - complain don't moan.
The fee is about £10 for releasing data. Not police's decision, data protection law dictates this. The police are not responsible for paying out money in car accidents - that's the job of your insurance company - you know the one you pay the money to for the service. We investigate it from a police point of view. Any findings, evidence, statements, witness details, DNA, breath & toxicology results etc etc is securely stored and if private persons want access they will need to follow the set procedures to release the data. Or do you want the police to break the law and give out details ***** nilly?
And like i said before - if your not happy - complain don't moan.
The fee is about £10 for releasing data. Not police's decision, data protection law dictates this. The police are not responsible for paying out money in car accidents - that's the job of your insurance company - you know the one you pay the money to for the service. We investigate it from a police point of view. Any findings, evidence, statements, witness details, DNA, breath & toxicology results etc etc is securely stored and if private persons want access they will need to follow the set procedures to release the data. Or do you want the police to break the law and give out details ***** nilly?
28 November 2016, 07:27 AM
#38
Eh? - you been on the sauce again!!!
It would appear that your insurance company can't be bothered to pay the fee to release the information they need to conduct their investigation. Seems a bit of a 'Mickey Mouse Company' that can't be bothered to pay a simple fee.
And what photograph? - You never mentioned there was a photograph of the accident, if so what was the reg on that? Perhaps you could send that to your insurance company.
It would appear that your insurance company can't be bothered to pay the fee to release the information they need to conduct their investigation. Seems a bit of a 'Mickey Mouse Company' that can't be bothered to pay a simple fee.
And what photograph? - You never mentioned there was a photograph of the accident, if so what was the reg on that? Perhaps you could send that to your insurance company.
Ah - i see you have spun it back to speeding again. Just don't go over the limit and you'll be alright. And no 'demanding money with menaces' if its not you, just say so or use due diligence. If it is you, why no just admit to what you have done. Still only about 1% of our contact with the public I'm afraid.
And like i said before - if your not happy - complain don't moan.
The fee is about £10 for releasing data. Not police's decision, data protection law dictates this. The police are not responsible for paying out money in car accidents - that's the job of your insurance company - you know the one you pay the money to for the service. We investigate it from a police point of view. Any findings, evidence, statements, witness details, DNA, breath & toxicology results etc etc is securely stored and if private persons want access they will need to follow the set procedures to release the data. Or do you want the police to break the law and give out details ***** nilly?
And like i said before - if your not happy - complain don't moan.
The fee is about £10 for releasing data. Not police's decision, data protection law dictates this. The police are not responsible for paying out money in car accidents - that's the job of your insurance company - you know the one you pay the money to for the service. We investigate it from a police point of view. Any findings, evidence, statements, witness details, DNA, breath & toxicology results etc etc is securely stored and if private persons want access they will need to follow the set procedures to release the data. Or do you want the police to break the law and give out details ***** nilly?
Obviously a slow day for alcazar....
25 December 2016, 11:12 PM
#41
This why people are loosing the trust in the police force, officers like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpkuOSIjzUU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpkuOSIjzUU
The police are under staffed and have to deal with time wasters like him daily
If the police want to be taken seriously, ditch the speed cameras and replace them with ANPR and have units close by. Get disqual drivers, no MOT, no insurance, no road tax, pool cars, off the streets, then you might get some credibility back.......
26 December 2016, 01:05 AM
#42
The cam guy is a fuking pr1ck
The police are under staffed and have to deal with time wasters like him daily
If the police want to be taken seriously, ditch the speed cameras and replace them with ANPR and have units close by. Get disqual drivers, no MOT, no insurance, no road tax, pool cars, off the streets, then you might get some credibility back.......
The police are under staffed and have to deal with time wasters like him daily
If the police want to be taken seriously, ditch the speed cameras and replace them with ANPR and have units close by. Get disqual drivers, no MOT, no insurance, no road tax, pool cars, off the streets, then you might get some credibility back.......
So, if I walk up to a copper and slap them nothing should be done or would be done ?
Which after a Google it shows they did nothing but talk to the Copper in question,
I recently reported 3 youths in a car, one waving a firearm out a car window, I rang 999, they did nothing, the vehicle they were in had no MOT/tax or Insurance, hadnt for a number of years.
26 December 2016, 03:51 AM
#43
The cam g9uy is a fuking pr1ck
The police are under staffed and have to deal with time wasters like him daily
If the police want to be taken seriously, ditch the speed cameras and replace them with ANPR and have units close by. Get disqual drivers, no MOT, no insurance, no road tax, pool cars, off the streets, then you might get some credibility back.......
The police are under staffed and have to deal with time wasters like him daily
If the police want to be taken seriously, ditch the speed cameras and replace them with ANPR and have units close by. Get disqual drivers, no MOT, no insurance, no road tax, pool cars, off the streets, then you might get some credibility back.......
26 December 2016, 12:50 PM
#44
Scooby Regular
Not all of them are bad to be honest
there's always the ones that would go out of there way for you and help as I have found and then some that will make you take your socks off to check for drugs for no reason what so ever when it's suppose to be a routine check over !!
I've learnt along the way not to argue with them as it only makes things worse infact you can't win they will always have you one way or the other if you get on there wrong side,
I'm alwYs the first to pull over and walk over to the passenger side of the police car and it makes things more pleasant
there's always the ones that would go out of there way for you and help as I have found and then some that will make you take your socks off to check for drugs for no reason what so ever when it's suppose to be a routine check over !!
I've learnt along the way not to argue with them as it only makes things worse infact you can't win they will always have you one way or the other if you get on there wrong side,
I'm alwYs the first to pull over and walk over to the passenger side of the police car and it makes things more pleasant
28 December 2016, 01:05 PM
#46
Update:
This is STILL ongoing. Nothing from Hastings, (my insurers), their silly girl in claims just kept repeating that "we have to go on the version of events we've been given", which is rubbish.
South Yorks Police STILL not confirmed it in writing, despite telling me a month ago by telephone.
Even tried Sainsburys Ins who are the damaged vehicle's insurers, and, of course, they are not interested at all.
Further Update: Hastings just rang me back and told me that Sainsburys have had the correct vehicle number for the car that did the damage all along, but have negelcted to tell Hastings....
I'm now awaiting an email confirming it wasn't me........
This is STILL ongoing. Nothing from Hastings, (my insurers), their silly girl in claims just kept repeating that "we have to go on the version of events we've been given", which is rubbish.
South Yorks Police STILL not confirmed it in writing, despite telling me a month ago by telephone.
Even tried Sainsburys Ins who are the damaged vehicle's insurers, and, of course, they are not interested at all.
Further Update: Hastings just rang me back and told me that Sainsburys have had the correct vehicle number for the car that did the damage all along, but have negelcted to tell Hastings....
I'm now awaiting an email confirming it wasn't me........
28 December 2016, 01:45 PM
#47
Scooby Regular
Update:
This is STILL ongoing. Nothing from Hastings, (my insurers), their silly girl in claims just kept repeating that "we have to go on the version of events we've been given", which is rubbish.
South Yorks Police STILL not confirmed it in writing, despite telling me a month ago by telephone.
Even tried Sainsburys Ins who are the damaged vehicle's insurers, and, of course, they are not interested at all.
Further Update: Hastings just rang me back and told me that Sainsburys have had the correct vehicle number for the car that did the damage all along, but have negelcted to tell Hastings....
I'm now awaiting an email confirming it wasn't me........
This is STILL ongoing. Nothing from Hastings, (my insurers), their silly girl in claims just kept repeating that "we have to go on the version of events we've been given", which is rubbish.
South Yorks Police STILL not confirmed it in writing, despite telling me a month ago by telephone.
Even tried Sainsburys Ins who are the damaged vehicle's insurers, and, of course, they are not interested at all.
Further Update: Hastings just rang me back and told me that Sainsburys have had the correct vehicle number for the car that did the damage all along, but have negelcted to tell Hastings....
I'm now awaiting an email confirming it wasn't me........
hope you get that email for future proof just incase...
28 December 2016, 04:43 PM
#49
This why people are loosing the trust in the police force, officers like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpkuOSIjzUU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpkuOSIjzUU