When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Computer & Technology RelatedPost here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.
who gives a stuff whether it last another half hour on battery life , or whether yo can charge it in 2 v 3 hours , or 5 minutes with the charger you are presumably taking around in your other pocket
I'm pretty damn sure most people simply charge their phones overnight
You're such a donkey I don't know why I bother, let me get this straight, you're comparing the iPhone 7 to every device running Android, cherry picking features from all of them, ****ing LOL.
And yes, it is 2016... still. How do you expect to see 2016 figures when the year's not over!!!
I should post up your battery life picture every now and then to remind myself what a dunce you are.
who gives a stuff whether it last another half hour on battery life , or whether yo can charge it in 2 v 3 hours , or 5 minutes with the charger you are presumably taking around in your other pocket
I'm pretty damn sure most people simply charge their phones overnight
Then companies like Qualcomm would just forget all the sales and IP they own right.
You are dumb and know funk all about tech yet keep sticking your nose in here thinking you are the man.
Having owned fast charge devices for a few years know I would never go back to something like an iPhone, its not just the fact fast charge devices charge quicker, you can also get a huge amount of charge in very little time so while you are getting breakfast you can have enough charge on your device to last the day.
Fast charge 3 gives about 60% in 30 minutes. Apple cant do any fast charge until they deal with the lightning port and use a third party to support it for fast charge.
I know about the tech in lots of devices, like the Zen Fone Deluxe with its 6GB of RAM. HTC are famous for boomsound so its rare to find an Android fan who doesnt know this stuff.
That geezer was clearly a total fanboi chasing after something new
its actually only now the thing has gps , that it could impinge on other markets leaders in sports sector - be intresting see what the figures are this time next year
You're such a donkey I don't know why I bother, let me get this straight, you're comparing the iPhone 7 to every device running Android, cherry picking features from all of them, ****ing LOL.
And yes, it is 2016... still. How do you expect to see 2016 figures when the year's not over!!!
I should post up your battery life picture every now and then to remind myself what a dunce you are.
I am still getting healthy battery life, the only Jack *** is you and how continually supportive of Apple you are. Apple have had terrible sales all year and wont even release iPhone 7 sales.
Then companies like Qualcomm would just forget all the sales and IP they own right.
You are dumb and know funk all about tech yet keep sticking your nose in here thinking you are the man.
Having owned fast charge devices for a few years know I would never go back to something like an iPhone, its not just the fact fast charge devices charge quicker, you can also get a huge amount of charge in very little time so while you are getting breakfast you can have enough charge on your device to last the day.
Fast charge 3 gives about 60% in 30 minutes. Apple cant do any fast charge until they deal with the lightning port and use a third party to support it for fast charge.
why bloody hell would you charge it at breakfast when you've had all night
is that an advert on your battery stats, seems legit. And is it trying to say that you used 16% of the battery in 3 days? 18 day battery life?? Do you think that's real?
why bloody hell would you charge it at breakfast when you've had all night
whatever.
Fast charge enables you to charge up much faster over conventional ( aka iPhones) and the new 3.0 version is also more power efficent and dissipates less heat and as you might have gathered lately heat is not good for consumer electronics.
No one is going to buy an iPhone that takes 3 hours to charge up......period.
I'm not denying that Apple may move to OLED, but it will be a whole lot better than anything available right now, why would they go backwards? The iPhone 7 has the most perfect display ever tested and it's LCD incredible isn't it.
In the next few years, Samsung will add a version of Touch ID and will have something like the Taptic Engine, they'll also remove the headphone socket. That's about as useful a statement as you banging on about Apple moving to OLED, i.e. not at all.
As a Samsung user you'd be best advised to not discuss batteries right now, they don't have the best reputation.
I'm not denying that Apple may move to OLED, but it will be a whole lot better than anything available right now, why would they go backwards? The iPhone 7 has the most perfect display ever tested and it's LCD incredible isn't it.
In the next few years, Samsung will add a version of Touch ID and will have something like the Taptic Engine, they'll also remove the headphone socket. That's about as useful a statement as you banging on about Apple moving to OLED, i.e. not at all.
As a Samsung user you'd be best advised to not discuss batteries right now, they don't have the best reputation.
As an EE, I design circuits and test batteries in my day job so its safe to say I know more about batteries than an iSheep sales man like you will ever know, and of course the OLED display on the next iPhone will be amazing, it will hardly be terrible will it Jack. If Apple put a 3" display on the iPhone 8 it would be utterly amazing.
I honestly don't believe that. You couldn't read a graph showing the battery life of your mobile phone so you're hardly qualified to have anything to do with testing electronics.
I honestly don't believe that. You couldn't read a graph showing the battery life of your mobile phone so you're hardly qualified to have anything to do with testing electronics.
whatever, you are effectively a brain dead zombie at this rate from Apple.
Maccor make some tasty test equipment, the 96 channel series 4000 I use at work would confuse you too much.
whatever, you are effectively a brain dead zombie at this rate from Apple.
Maccor make some tasty test equipment, the 96 channel series 4000 I use at work would confuse you too much.
Maybe it would. But I don't have trouble with a simple graph and I don't spend my time with a face full of custard pie on here.
Maybe it would. But I don't have trouble with a simple graph and I don't spend my time with a face full of custard pie on here.
Any of the graphs I posted show that the Galaxy devices get much longer time between charges than outdated iPhones, and they charge quicker also. The most recent graph above (the one with adverts) shows about 40 hours between recharges which is what I have been getting.
Any of the graphs I posted show that the Galaxy devices get much longer time between charges than outdated iPhones, and they charge quicker also. The most recent graph above (the one with adverts) shows about 40 hours between recharges which is what I have been getting.
I'll post the graph to make it easier to laugh at your feeble effort.
A normal person would look at that graph and understand that both phone your phone and the iPhone 7 get around 10 hours of internet usage on 3G. I can't see that happening often between charges but it's a pretty good numbers. What it also shows is that the iPhone gets around 10 hours of time on the telephone between charges, that's a lot of time on the phone between charges, I mean what sort of person spends 10 hours on their mobile phone per day! I'd be changing my life not my phone.
I care about real life usage, you care about big numbers.
Last edited by JackClark; 12 October 2016 at 07:51 AM.
I'll post the graph to make it easier to laugh at your feeble effort.
A normal person would look at that graph and understand that both phone your phone and the iPhone 7 get around 10 hours of internet usage on 3G. I can't see that happening often between charges but it's a pretty good numbers. What it also shows is that the iPhone gets around 10 hours of time on the telephone between charges, that's a lot of time on the phone between charges, I mean what sort of person spends 10 hours on their mobile phone per day! I'd be changing my life not my phone.
I care about real life usage, you care about big numbers.
Thats funny Jack, in just about every review you can come across the battery life is slated, like the phone itself.
“during our tests we didn’t see any evidence of great battery life at all.”
You went on about the Apple iPhone destroying Androids in real world tests, well you know something Jack? The reality is that in the most important real world test, that is consumers buying a product......its Apple who are getting walked over shat on and discarded with aplomb!
Samsung were having a field day in 2016 with sales and need to seriously have a look at themselves after the Note 7 fiasco but I cant see any Android fans who would buy the Note 7 migrate to the POS that is the iPhone 7.
You're such a sucker for clickbait, you're even linking to a low grade music site that's using the same graph you posted earlier to generate advertising revenue and you're willingly spreading it, such a sucker.
Samsung has been killing it in 2016 with sales so clearly people do want devices that charge faster and more besides.
The S7 series with millions of sales globally is testimony to that and is the best selling smartphone of 2016 i believe.
Trying to get fanboys to see the light..........good luck with that.
The note 7 fiasco gives some breathing space to the competition but most punters in the market for phablets like the Note 7 will get Android models rather than the iPhone 7 - outdated and far over priced.
Apple Suppliers’ Sept. Revenues Show Weak iPhone 7 Demand
You're such a sucker for clickbait, you're even linking to a low grade music site that's using the same graph you posted earlier to generate advertising revenue and you're willingly spreading it, such a sucker.
You make my day Custard Pie, so easy to laugh at.
Everything is low grade to a brain dead fanboy like you, too bad for you no one is actually buying iPhones eh which goes to show you truly are one of a kind.
A muppet sucked so far into the Apple eco system with your head so far up your **** you cant see daylight.
Samsung has been killing it in 2016 with sales so clearly people do want devices that charge faster and more besides.
The S7 series with millions of sales globally is testimony to that and is the best selling smartphone of 2016 i believe.
Trying to get fanboys to see the light..........good luck with that.
The note 7 fiasco gives some breathing space to the competition but most punters in the market for phablets like the Note 7 will get Android models rather than the iPhone 7 - outdated and far over priced.
Apple Suppliers’ Sept. Revenues Show Weak iPhone 7 Demand
Everything is low grade to a brain dead fanboy like you, too bad for you no one is actually buying iPhones eh which goes to show you truly are one of a kind.
A muppet sucked so far into the Apple eco system with your head so far up your **** you cant see daylight.
No one's buying iPhones, LOL. It's been out a month and still sold out everywhere.
Don't forget Captain Custard I have an Android device and a Windows machine.
11 October 2016, 10:32 PM
