Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Hinckley - Yes or No?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2016 | 01:16 PM
  #31  
^Qwerty^'s Avatar
^Qwerty^
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 25
From: East Yorkshire
Default

We only need one cold winter with a massive area of high pressure over Europe and the focus on building new plants, and maybe not shutting the others until they have been replaced, will probably occur. IMO.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2016 | 02:26 PM
  #32  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
It's quite possible that the project has stalled because of this...just whose nuclear plant is it? Be it now or in the future....

The conspiracy theorist in me suspects that with the costs involved and EDFs current financial affairs-having had bailout money from the French government, I have to question are they going to complete this project? The Chinese involvement compounds this...if EDF fails who owns the Hinkley C project? What if the French government call time on their bail out and sell their share? What if the Chinese buyout EDF? Or what if the Chinese pull out? If it all collapses who foots the bill to finish it? Will the UK government end up bailing it out....

And the proper conspiracy...is the Hinkley C project geared to intentionally fail or run out of money to force the government (French or British) to bail it out? Leading it back to the original question of whose power plant is it?
well it is certainly wheels with wheels, according to reports the Chinese are pretty p1ssed of about it

which then would lead to pretty tense trade negotiations
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2016 | 04:55 PM
  #33  
Dr Hu's Avatar
Dr Hu
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 28
From: Shropshire
Default

I personally think its insanity that for such an important resource that this isn't done entirely 'in house' - the UK used to lead the world in Nuclear Research & Development......
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2016 | 09:59 PM
  #34  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
well it is certainly wheels with wheels, according to reports the Chinese are pretty p1ssed of about it

which then would lead to pretty tense trade negotiations
Sounds like they are

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36943792
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 09:54 AM
  #35  
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,701
Likes: 128
From: Herts & Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by Dr Hu
I personally think its insanity that for such an important resource that this isn't done entirely 'in house' - the UK used to lead the world in Nuclear Research & Development......
I agree, our own government should be funding this, not China! This is crazy and stupid.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 11:58 AM
  #36  
Paben's Avatar
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
From: Taken to the hills
Default

Originally Posted by BrownPantsRacing
I agree, our own government should be funding this, not China! This is crazy and stupid.

It looks like our new PM thinks the same.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 01:13 PM
  #37  
David Lock's Avatar
David Lock
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
From: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
well it is certainly wheels with wheels, according to reports the Chinese are pretty p1ssed of about it

which then would lead to pretty tense trade negotiations

Send in Boris - that'll put an end to it (and him with a bit of luck)


Just build a couple of smaller cheaper plants with HS2 money.


But ebay/generator might be a plan. Buggered if I want to sit in the cold and dark


david
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 01:24 PM
  #38  
ALi-B's Avatar
ALi-B
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
But ebay/generator might be a plan. Buggered if I want to sit in the cold and dark


david
I'm on the lookout for a Lister Start-O-Matic to retore and use ready for the energy apocolypse.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2016 | 02:00 PM
  #39  
David Lock's Avatar
David Lock
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
From: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Default

Anyone that has spent any time in Nigeria will smile at the power outage concerns. The power supply company was NEPA known colloquially as "Never Any Power Anywhere" Deep freezes would melt and refreeze and generators were common place. One major downside was the need to use the stairs rather than the lifts and 5 flights with briefcase and 90% humidity was no fun


David
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 10:17 AM
  #40  
RobJenks's Avatar
RobJenks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
well it is certainly wheels with wheels, according to reports the Chinese are pretty p1ssed of about it

which then would lead to pretty tense trade negotiations
F_U_C_K the chinese !

NO WAY SHOULD THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT PERMIT SUCH AN IMPORTANT PROJECT IN THE HANDS OF THE CHINESE
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 10:35 AM
  #41  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by RobJenks
F_U_C_K the chinese !

NO WAY SHOULD THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT PERMIT SUCH AN IMPORTANT PROJECT IN THE HANDS OF THE CHINESE
Nor any other foreign power.
By all means borrow the money and hire the skills to build it from wherever you get the best deal, but FFS don't let them OWN it
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 11:00 AM
  #42  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by Blue by You
Nor any other foreign power.
By all means borrow the money and hire the skills to build it from wherever you get the best deal, but FFS don't let them OWN it
but the whole point of the Brexit debate was that the UK becomes a "free trading" nation and specifically not part of any trading bloc - are you suggesting we can afford to p1ss off one of the biggest trading nations?

we have already p1ssed of the EU, now the Chinese

the mantra of the "free traders" - I.e most of the Brexiters is that the UK IS "open for business" to the rest of the world and we sell our national assets
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 11:44 AM
  #43  
RobJenks's Avatar
RobJenks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
but the whole point of the Brexit debate was that the UK becomes a "free trading" nation and specifically not part of any trading bloc - are you suggesting we can afford to p1ss off one of the biggest trading nations?

we have already p1ssed of the EU, now the Chinese

the mantra of the "free traders" - I.e most of the Brexiters is that the UK IS "open for business" to the rest of the world and we sell our national assets
I don't think that was the narrative proposed by Brexit.
Open for business obviously , but not open to sell our national security to a nation who's long term strategy is not fully known -But given its provocation in the south china sea and sabre rattling with japan and the Philippines is obviously not prepared to take a back seat in the future of world politics.
A country that is a power house of hacking .
I DON'T TRUST THE CHINESE.

Sovereignty of our power , water and military is paramount .
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 12:29 PM
  #44  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by RobJenks
I don't think that was the narrative proposed by Brexit.
Open for business obviously , but not open to sell our national security to a nation who's long term strategy is not fully known -But given its provocation in the south china sea and sabre rattling with japan and the Philippines is obviously not prepared to take a back seat in the future of world politics.
A country that is a power house of hacking .
I DON'T TRUST THE CHINESE.

Sovereignty of our power , water and military is paramount .
I think you might be 30 years too late

you might find the book Private Island by James Meek enlightening

https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...es-meek-review

and a process of selling the UK assets accelerated right up until 2015

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a6786926.html
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 01:46 PM
  #45  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
but the whole point of the Brexit debate was that the UK becomes a "free trading" nation and specifically not part of any trading bloc - are you suggesting we can afford to p1ss off one of the biggest trading nations?

we have already p1ssed of the EU, now the Chinese

the mantra of the "free traders" - I.e most of the Brexiters is that the UK IS "open for business" to the rest of the world and we sell our national assets
Sure they'll get pi55ed off, but it's business and they know it, and until the contract is signed there is no contract. So it's only their egos and aspirations that have been damaged. They'll get over it when we get through this temporary turmoil and (hopefully) emerge as a stronger and independant global partner.
As far as BREXIT goes, I voted to remain, but that doesn't matter. What's done is done and we need to step up and make this work. I have no problem with the UK conducting fair and ethical trading with any nation on the planet. This isn't 'trade' in the normal sense though, is it.
This is the transference of ownership of part of our national industrial and energy infrastructure to a foreign power with, at the very best, questionable trading ethics and no conscience about how they get what they want. And BTW it's not just the Chinese I have an objection to selling out to, any foreign nation should have no holding power over our ability to support our national industry or population.

Look at what happened with TATA! That worked really well didn't it. Sell off the asset to foreign management for a fast buck, and when the **** hits the fan they drop us like a hot coal. This latest attempt to hive off the UK's wealth is just more of the same insanity.

Are we really saying it's a good idea to go on depleting our industrial and economic resources to the benefit of foreign governments? Utter nonsense is what it is.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 03:09 PM
  #46  
RobJenks's Avatar
RobJenks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 12
Default

This has just popped up by coincidence

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...pute-Australia
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 03:47 PM
  #47  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by RobJenks
This has just popped up by coincidence

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...pute-Australia
That's about their mark, a bit like Russia.
Without the brain!
Like we really need that kind of business mentality with more footholds in this country.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 03:50 PM
  #48  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by Blue by You
Sure they'll get pi55ed off, but it's business and they know it, and until the contract is signed there is no contract. So it's only their egos and aspirations that have been damaged. They'll get over it when we get through this temporary turmoil and (hopefully) emerge as a stronger and independant global partner.
As far as BREXIT goes, I voted to remain, but that doesn't matter. What's done is done and we need to step up and make this work. I have no problem with the UK conducting fair and ethical trading with any nation on the planet. This isn't 'trade' in the normal sense though, is it.
This is the transference of ownership of part of our national industrial and energy infrastructure to a foreign power with, at the very best, questionable trading ethics and no conscience about how they get what they want. And BTW it's not just the Chinese I have an objection to selling out to, any foreign nation should have no holding power over our ability to support our national industry or population.

Look at what happened with TATA! That worked really well didn't it. Sell off the asset to foreign management for a fast buck, and when the **** hits the fan they drop us like a hot coal. This latest attempt to hive off the UK's wealth is just more of the same insanity.

Are we really saying it's a good idea to go on depleting our industrial and economic resources to the benefit of foreign governments? Utter nonsense is what it is.
yes, I sort of agree with most of that

but the underlying philosophical economic argument from the (Tory) Brexiters is diametrically opposed to the sentiments in your post
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 04:18 PM
  #49  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
yes, I sort of agree with most of that

but the underlying philosophical economic argument from the (Tory) Brexiters is diametrically opposed to the sentiments in your post
Fortunately TM was a 'remainer' and will hopefully provide some restraint against the asset strippers. I'm sure BoJo will have a sticky paw in the pie though.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2016 | 09:23 PM
  #50  
Paben's Avatar
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
From: Taken to the hills
Default

Economic issues can be set aside here. The real questions is simple. Do we really want to be in the power of a country that aligns itself not only with Putin's Russia but with the madmen of North Korea? I think not.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2016 | 05:44 AM
  #51  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

Reply
Old Aug 9, 2016 | 11:16 AM
  #52  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Oh no, the Chinese are dismayed at our dalliance in making a decision about Hinkley.
From the BBC, "The Chinese Ambassador Liu Xiaoming said the delay to approving the plant had brought the two countries to a "crucial historical juncture".He hinted that "mutual trust" could be in jeopardy if the UK Government decided not to approve the deal."


I have no issues with Chinese individuals, but does anybody really (I mean really) trust the Chinese as a nation? They have proved themselves to be excellent at diving, but unfortunately they are pretty good at ducking as well

Last edited by Blue by You; Aug 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2016 | 11:43 AM
  #53  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

They certainly dissing May !
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2016 | 01:59 PM
  #54  
ReallyReallyGoodMeat's Avatar
ReallyReallyGoodMeat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 1
Default

China?! HA! We don't need their investment! We've got our friends in Eur.... oh.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2016 | 02:20 PM
  #55  
jonc's Avatar
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,647
Likes: 22
Default

Cameron/Osborne negotiated an incredibly poor deal for the UK in which it would allow EDF/Chinese state controlled investors complete control the facility and to charge a guarenteed £92.50 per megawatt hour, the current price is £38 per megawatt hour!! Whilst this is deal is geared massively to the foriegn investors benefit, from a national security point of view, China could potentially hold the UK ransom and potentially do whatever it likes with the nuclear facility, a country who in all likelihood would be potential enemy of the UK in an unstable world and send the facility in to meltdown. I hope our new PM will withdraw from this very bad deal for our country's sake.

By all means trade with China, but not with our energy and utilities, what next outsource the running of HMNB Clyde to a Chinese state controlled company!?
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2016 | 04:43 PM
  #56  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
China?! HA! We don't need their investment! We've got our friends in Eur.... oh.
Like France you mean?
Why would we give them control of a nuclear facility in our country?


Originally Posted by jonc
Cameron/Osborne negotiated an incredibly poor deal for the UK in which it would allow EDF/Chinese state controlled investors complete control the facility and to charge a guarenteed £92.50 per megawatt hour, the current price is £38 per megawatt hour!! Whilst this is deal is geared massively to the foriegn investors benefit, from a national security point of view, China could potentially hold the UK ransom and potentially do whatever it likes with the nuclear facility, a country who in all likelihood would be potential enemy of the UK in an unstable world and send the facility in to meltdown. I hope our new PM will withdraw from this very bad deal for our country's sake.

By all means trade with China, but not with our energy and utilities, what next outsource the running of HMNB Clyde to a Chinese state controlled company!?
Absolutely
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InTurbo
Subaru Parts
4
May 23, 2016 05:15 PM
dpb
Computer & Technology Related
8
May 6, 2016 02:11 PM
scoober101
General Technical
0
May 1, 2016 05:39 PM
Keith Collings
Wanted
0
May 1, 2016 07:27 AM
td05isalive
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
Apr 28, 2016 10:24 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 PM.