Flat earth or globe
Did I
What are you trying to say about the start point ? Is it that the building didn't fall at the speed of gravity ? Which nobody denies that it did for 8 floors , I guess it's because the penthouse took out all support in the building
The problem isn't that it came straight down due to gravity just that it did it so evenly and completely ,
If nist would make there computer model available for scrutiny that would be enough to convince me there investigation was legit
What are you trying to say about the start point ? Is it that the building didn't fall at the speed of gravity ? Which nobody denies that it did for 8 floors , I guess it's because the penthouse took out all support in the building
The problem isn't that it came straight down due to gravity just that it did it so evenly and completely ,
If nist would make there computer model available for scrutiny that would be enough to convince me there investigation was legit
Last edited by gary77; Apr 5, 2016 at 09:36 AM.
Can you answer my question from earlier please , what would be enough evidence to consider investigating whether explosives were used ,
The possability of a conspiracy really depends on there computer model holding up to independent scrutiny which they won't allow it to be examined ,
The possability of a conspiracy really depends on there computer model holding up to independent scrutiny which they won't allow it to be examined ,
So your opinion is that the debate should end after the BBC discussion ?
It all boils down to if the nist report is legitimate or not and the only way to come to a conclusion on that is to have an independant review of there model
If you can show me video or picture footage of the damage and fully involved fire of the building , that will do to admit I'm 100% wrong to question it all
But if you can aswer the question about what evedence of controlled demolition would be enough to start an investigation that would help
It all boils down to if the nist report is legitimate or not and the only way to come to a conclusion on that is to have an independant review of there model
If you can show me video or picture footage of the damage and fully involved fire of the building , that will do to admit I'm 100% wrong to question it all
But if you can aswer the question about what evedence of controlled demolition would be enough to start an investigation that would help
Last edited by gary77; Apr 5, 2016 at 10:34 AM.
So your opinion is that the debate should end after the BBC discussion ?
It all boils down to if the nist report is legitimate or not and the only way to come to a conclusion on that is to have an independant review of there model
If you can show me video or picture footage of the damage and fully involved fire of the building , that will do to admit I'm 100% wrong to question it all
But if you can aswer the question about what evedence of controlled demolition would be enough to start an investigation that would help
It all boils down to if the nist report is legitimate or not and the only way to come to a conclusion on that is to have an independant review of there model
If you can show me video or picture footage of the damage and fully involved fire of the building , that will do to admit I'm 100% wrong to question it all
But if you can aswer the question about what evedence of controlled demolition would be enough to start an investigation that would help
here is a pic of a building rigged for demolition
here is a view on what it takes to rig a building for demolition
http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Ne...l/story.html#1
from the website
take note of my highlights - it took months
now you show me that kind of evidence
because we don't live in a world of Bruce Willis Die Hard where he rigs it all up to blow in an afternoon (4 miles of cabling - where did it all come from, who saw it, where is the paper trail - the purchase orders, it goes on and on)
conspiracy theories are the easiest gig in the world
then show me the audio of the charges going off - they are quite distinct in a controlled demolition
Last edited by hodgy0_2; Apr 5, 2016 at 11:35 AM.
great little video - quite sad in reality
https://vimeo.com/145070280
that shows these guys to be lonely clowns they are
https://vimeo.com/145070280
that shows these guys to be lonely clowns they are
If the earth is a globe as most people would agree with then why can everyone in the world no matter where they are be standing up.feet on the ground and sky above their head at the same time.
I know it's a joke to say Australians are upside down but in reality they would have to be if we live on a ball.
I know it's a joke to say Australians are upside down but in reality they would have to be if we live on a ball.
Its not flat - or you could see the base of these buildings 20kms away.
I've seen a curved horizon from the top of a mountain.
PS - Google "gravity"
Come on hodgy , try and stick to the flow of conversation , I asked a question a long time back , can you answer it . Then I'll come up with something in reply to your view that there is only one way to demolish an entire building ,
I wonder ,in the case of wtc 7 , would they work out that the building is so unique only one column would have to be destroyed to bring the building down in a controlled manner , if what nist claim is true
That's my best effort at good grammer
I wonder ,in the case of wtc 7 , would they work out that the building is so unique only one column would have to be destroyed to bring the building down in a controlled manner , if what nist claim is true
That's my best effort at good grammer
What I've never understood is what the point in the 'flat earth conspiracy' is? Most conspiracy theories at least have a point be it; mind control, population control or merely protecting the lives of our reptilian overlords. I really can't see what is achieved by covering up the shape if the earth.
great little video - quite sad in reality
https://vimeo.com/145070280
that shows these guys to be lonely clowns they are
https://vimeo.com/145070280
that shows these guys to be lonely clowns they are
What I've never understood is what the point in the 'flat earth conspiracy' is? Most conspiracy theories at least have a point be it; mind control, population control or merely protecting the lives of our reptilian overlords. I really can't see what is achieved by covering up the shape if the earth. 

i just cant believe anyone who looks at 9/11 with an open mind doesnt think something rotten went on that day. nothing to do with flat earth theory, aliens and reptilian overlords just that things went on that were just suspicious.







