Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

The US and guns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 April 2016, 08:20 PM
  #61  
DoZZa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DoZZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JDM MY97 Type R - 2.1 Stroker
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paben
There are actually many millions of legally held guns and firearms in the UK, kept by registered owners. In the US the registered firearm genie long ago left the bottle and nothing can be done to put it back. Perhaps requiring a licence to purchase ammunition could be a start though, it would at least flag up the regular users and gun owners.
Of course, shotgun license and FAC license holders.

And to obtain such a license, you have to hand over you medical records, be vetted by the Police and have them visit the location you have your guns and ammo stored to make sure it is indeed safe.

Does any of that happen in the US?
Old 28 April 2016, 08:21 PM
  #62  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Oh dear a Sandy Hook hoaxer

The are pretty much the lowest of the low,

They peddle the myth that no one died at Sandy Hook, no children no teachers, all a big hoax - a false flag

And the grieving parents are simply "crises actors" and their children did not die!!!!!!!

Simply posting long debunked cr4p (much like the hillsborough thread)
It's sickening, isn't it? In fact I'm struggling to find reasons to knock around on S'net anymore. Perhaps it's time to move on.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:23 PM
  #63  
DoZZa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DoZZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JDM MY97 Type R - 2.1 Stroker
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Oh dear a Sandy Hook hoaxer

The are pretty much the lowest of the low,
Oh dear, another with his head in the clouds.

Makes no difference to me what you believe.

The lowest of the low indeed, why would a government use such a tactic to obtain political gain, surely they wouldn't use a school and a lot of dead kids and teachers to achieve their goal, would they?

Wake the **** up!
Old 28 April 2016, 08:25 PM
  #64  
DoZZa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DoZZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JDM MY97 Type R - 2.1 Stroker
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
It's sickening, isn't it? In fact I'm struggling to find reasons to knock around on S'net anymore. Perhaps it's time to move on.
And another, do you honestly believe all of the things you are drip feed by the governments and media?
Old 28 April 2016, 08:26 PM
  #65  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoZZa
And another, do you honestly believe all of the things you are drip feed by the governments and media?
I'm not going to dignify your claptrap with a considered response. I'm out.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:32 PM
  #66  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DoZZa
Of course, shotgun license and FAC license holders.

And to obtain such a license, you have to hand over you medical records, be vetted by the Police and have them visit the location you have your guns and ammo stored to make sure it is indeed safe.

Does any of that happen in the US?

No, and it's too late in the US as there are billions of guns already in circulation. The only restriction, and then only in some places, is that when purchasing a pistol over the counter there is a three day 'cooling off' period before you can actually take it. Licencing for ammunition purchase would be a good start towards registration and all those intending to buy ammo would have to register.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:33 PM
  #67  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paben
There are actually many millions of legally held guns and firearms in the UK, kept by registered owners. In the US the registered firearm genie long ago left the bottle and nothing can be done to put it back. Perhaps requiring a licence to purchase ammunition could be a start though, it would at least flag up the regular users and gun owners.
If the number of guns itself over there can't be reduced (and I accept that with the quantity of them already in circulation, it's a bit of a lost cause), what would seem to make sense is a law or laws enforcing severe penalties for anyone allowing their legally obtained firearm to fall into the hands of anyone it shouldn't do. Apparently, the fear alone of being accidentally shot in the head by their own kids isn't enough for some people to make sure that doesn't happen.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:42 PM
  #68  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
If the number of guns itself over there can't be reduced (and I accept that with the quantity of them already in circulation, it's a bit of a lost cause), what would seem to make sense is a law or laws enforcing severe penalties for anyone allowing their legally obtained firearm to fall into the hands of anyone it shouldn't do. Apparently, the fear alone of being accidentally shot in the head by their own kids isn't enough for some people to make sure that doesn't happen.

Being shot by your own kids is not a regular occurence even in the US. And since all purchasable firearms in the US are legally held (even by children in the majority of states) it would be hard to define which 'hands' would be disallowed and so such a law would fall flat.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:45 PM
  #69  
DoZZa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DoZZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JDM MY97 Type R - 2.1 Stroker
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
I'm not going to dignify your claptrap with a considered response. I'm out.
No hard feelings buddy, we all have our differing opinions. After all, if we all had the same values and beliefs, the world would be a very compliant, but boring place to live!
Old 28 April 2016, 08:48 PM
  #70  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paben
Being shot by your own kids is not a regular occurence even in the US. And since all purchasable firearms in the US are legally held (even by children in the majority of states) it would be hard to define which 'hands' would be disallowed and so such a law would fall flat.
In that case, keep it simple - disallow anyone except the legal owner, with an exemption for guns on loan at a legally operated range.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:50 PM
  #71  
DoZZa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DoZZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JDM MY97 Type R - 2.1 Stroker
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
If the number of guns itself over there can't be reduced (and I accept that with the quantity of them already in circulation, it's a bit of a lost cause), what would seem to make sense is a law or laws enforcing severe penalties for anyone allowing their legally obtained firearm to fall into the hands of anyone it shouldn't do. Apparently, the fear alone of being accidentally shot in the head by their own kids isn't enough for some people to make sure that doesn't happen.
Then half of the population of the US would end up in jail. They are very lax about the way they keep their guns, locking them away is almost alien to them. So many will not lock them away and unauthorised use of the gun will undoubtedly happen.

Ammo restrictions are a possible way forward, but it will take years to have any real effect.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:54 PM
  #72  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
In that case, keep it simple - disallow anyone except the legal owner, with an exemption for guns on loan at a legally operated range.

You're missing the point. In the US there are no 'legal' owners and other than when committing a crime anyone can legally use a gun.
Old 28 April 2016, 08:58 PM
  #73  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DoZZa
Then half of the population of the US would end up in jail. They are very lax about the way they keep their guns, locking them away is almost alien to them. So many will not lock them away and unauthorised use of the gun will undoubtedly happen.

Ammo restrictions are a possible way forward, but it will take years to have any real effect.

No it wouldn't take years it would take almost immediate effect if the purchase of ammunition required a licence. It wouldn't catch all of course, but it would catch a great many and the registration of all of their weaponry could easily be enforced.
Old 28 April 2016, 09:02 PM
  #74  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paben
You're missing the point. In the US there are no 'legal' owners and other than when committing a crime anyone can legally use a gun.
What about background checks then, which AFAIK are compulsory across the US? Or aren't these recorded in a permanent database anywhere?
Old 28 April 2016, 09:12 PM
  #75  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
What about background checks then, which AFAIK are compulsory across the US? Or aren't these recorded in a permanent database anywhere?

FBI background checks are only compulsory if you buy from a store and they are only to check you are not a felon or mentally impaired. There is no record kept as this would amount to registration, which is not legally permitted. Of the very many millions of store purchase applications very few are actually turned down. Of course large numbers of guns are traded at gun clubs, between private individuals etc, where there are no background checks of any sort required.
Old 28 April 2016, 09:39 PM
  #76  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoZZa
So its not just a conspiracy to disarm American citizens then?

Look deeper into this, MUCH MUCH deeper, but only if you feel that you want to know the truth.

The world will be a better place without guns, and while I am glad that we dont have them in any great numbers in this country, I feel that the Americans have the right to have guns if they so wish.

Remember, guns dont kill people, people kill people.

I agree that much tighter control is required to lessen the genuine gun issues in America, but a lot of what you see are hoaxes merely created to make guns look like the enemy for political reasons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_...iracy_theories

And in response to the video from beginning of this thread. See THIS

Why is that whenever something terrible happens, these tossers come out of the woodwork to contort things into some kind of government conspiracy?


If this was all about gun control , then it's singularly failed. Why would you post up this kind vile, nonsense? What's wrong with you?


And please don't throw the 'open your eyes' line at me

Last edited by Martin2005; 28 April 2016 at 09:40 PM.
Old 28 April 2016, 09:49 PM
  #77  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
It's sickening, isn't it? In fact I'm struggling to find reasons to knock around on S'net anymore. Perhaps it's time to move on.
Yes, they are truly sick - berating the parents of massacred Children as being "fakers" and being part of a conspiracy - unbelievable in its depravity

The problem is JT the other option is to simply exist in your own bubble

in a way you become like them, living in an echo chamber of self validation

These people need confronting and calling out whenever you meet them
Old 28 April 2016, 09:54 PM
  #78  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005


And please don't throw the 'open your eyes' line at me
lol Martin

Like the Flat Earthers, 911 Twoofers, climate deniers, Hoaxers, false flaggers, chemtrailers - it is always the same

Open your eyes, do your own research, here is a YouTube clip

Simply shorthand for "I believe any old **** I see on the Internet"

All the world experts are wrong because some w4nker on the Internet has put 2 and 2 together and come up with 3289
Old 28 April 2016, 09:56 PM
  #79  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Yes, they are truly sick - berating the parents of massacred Children as being "fakers" and being part of a conspiracy - unbelievable in its depravity

The problem is JT the other option is to simply exist in your own bubble

in a way you become like them, living in an echo chamber of self validation

These people need confronting and calling out whenever you meet them

The alternative direction, which most of us take, is to shake our heads and think 'utter tw@ts' and ignore them.
Old 28 April 2016, 10:18 PM
  #80  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paben
The alternative direction, which most of us take, is to shake our heads and think 'utter tw@ts' and ignore them.
true Paben

But we see it on the Hillsborough thread

10,000 without tickets - all drunk, breaking down barriers, creating a crush

And this after a 2 year inquest which proved it was all crap

Yet repeated a day after, like it was fact

Utter fvcking idiots - they need confronting
Old 28 April 2016, 10:29 PM
  #81  
DoZZa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DoZZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JDM MY97 Type R - 2.1 Stroker
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@ those with the closed minds.

Confronting, lol, what are you talking about!

You are avoiding confrontation by directing your comments at your friend above, hoping that I will read it and respond, well, I have read it and I will simply respond in saying that you can continue with your closed minded approach to life. If thats what works for you, then great, continue doing what your doing, your obviously happy in your own bubble. Why is your bubble so much better than mine!

You have also called into question my beliefs after absolutely zero discussion with me personally, you took zero time to find out anything about me, what I do, or who I actually am, you read something on the internet and came to a snap judgment about me, which I think relates to my next point.

I do not know you, I also do not think it is fair to make claims about you or judge you based on other people’s opinions. I would imagine you are probably OK, even if it is in small doses, or to just sit next to in silence without feeling uncomfortable.

Now on balance I think your comments are probably ignorant, ill researched, emotive, factually incorrect and probably self inflicted. I think it is likely to be an angry reaction to feeling “outside” of the wider group that we usually get here. This meant that fear got the better of you, and for that I am truly and genuinely sorry.

But continue with the abuse, the name calling, it just shows the extent of your intelligence and the fact that you choose to believe what ever the latest headlines in the tabloids appear to be.

Ill say it again, wake the **** up! I am done with the likes of you and wont be responding to any further comments you make on this subject as quite simply, your not worth the wear and tear on my keyboard!
Old 28 April 2016, 10:32 PM
  #82  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoZZa
@ those with the closed minds.

Confronting, lol, what are you talking about!

You are avoiding confrontation by directing your comments at your friend above, hoping that I will read it and respond, well, I have read it and I will simply respond in saying that you can continue with your closed minded approach to life. If thats what works for you, then great, continue doing what your doing, your obviously happy in your own bubble. Why is your bubble so much better than mine!

You have also called into question my beliefs after absolutely zero discussion with me personally, you took zero time to find out anything about me, what I do, or who I actually am, you read something on the internet and came to a snap judgment about me, which I think relates to my next point.

I do not know you, I also do not think it is fair to make claims about you or judge you based on other people’s opinions. I would imagine you are probably OK, even if it is in small doses, or to just sit next to in silence without feeling uncomfortable.

Now on balance I think your comments are probably ignorant, ill researched, emotive, factually incorrect and probably self inflicted. I think it is likely to be an angry reaction to feeling “outside” of the wider group that we usually get here. This meant that fear got the better of you, and for that I am truly and genuinely sorry.

But continue with the abuse, the name calling, it just shows the extent of your intelligence and the fact that you choose to believe what ever the latest headlines in the tabloids appear to be.

Ill say it again, wake the **** up! I am done with the likes of you and wont be responding to any further comments you make on this subject as quite simply, your not worth the wear and tear on my keyboard!

Well that's a result
Old 28 April 2016, 10:35 PM
  #83  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoZZa
ill researched!
Lol, yeah I've not immersed myself in the conspritorial bullsh1t that abounds the Internet
Old 28 April 2016, 10:59 PM
  #84  
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Paben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Taken to the hills
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Lol, yeah I've not immersed myself in the conspritorial bullsh1t that abounds the Internet

Commonsense quickly sniffs out the illogical rubbish and treats it accordingly, unfortunately commonsense is perhaps not that common on SNet
Old 28 April 2016, 11:05 PM
  #85  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Well there seems to be a lot of it about!!!!

And we honestly think we can survive alone in the world - with this much mind fvckery fvctard thinking

I have my doubts
Old 29 April 2016, 02:30 AM
  #86  
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
 
warrenm2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 29 April 2016, 12:56 PM
  #87  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Well that's a result

I think somebody hit a nerve!
Old 29 April 2016, 02:12 PM
  #88  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

whats interesting about that video is how obviously sensitive some in the US are about how they are perceived by the rest of the world

when you break the video down it is essentially in two parts

part 1 - he basically says the US isn't so bad because it is has a lower murder rate than Honduras, the rest of central America, Africa etc etc

great, but quite why he thinks it is so amazing to have a lower murder rate than Afghanistan is beyond me

he obviously makes the classic reference to left wing commies blah blah blah

the simple fact is even his figures show when you compare the US to pretty much all countries in Europe it is nearly 4 times as high

the second part is equally as laughable

so in the second part he basically cherry-picks the place with the lowest murder rate in US - undoubtedly a leafy all white prosperous suburb

he dismisses places like Detroit which has an unbelievably high murder rate - because he says the are black and left wing

and then compares this pocket of low murder rate to countries in Europe

and literally *********** himself vigorously over the fact that this little town full of rich gun totting mercans has a lower murder rate than countries in Europe

do you spot what he did? yes it’s so obvious a child could work it out

he takes one tiny part of the US and compares it with the whole of Germany or France or the UK

what he should do is take a part of Germany or France or the UK that has a similar socio economic profile and then compare them


cherry-pickers always get found out

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 29 April 2016 at 02:14 PM.
Old 29 April 2016, 06:38 PM
  #89  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DoZZa
And another, do you honestly believe all of the things you are drip feed by the governments and media?
Do you honestly believe everything you see on some YouTube conspiracy video?
Old 29 April 2016, 10:59 PM
  #90  
DoZZa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
DoZZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: JDM MY97 Type R - 2.1 Stroker
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
Do you honestly believe everything you see on some YouTube conspiracy video?
YouTube? lol, the only thing YouTube is good for are instructional videos.

You have to remember that YouTube is simply a gateway to make money for many people, they will post up all sorts of rubbish to get views to make some money.

So no, I dont use YouTube as a source for any conspiracy information.

I have various other sources, none of which I will be linking to on this forum! And I have various offline sources too. My previous job as a freelance security analyst, of which I pursued for 15 years, put me in contact with very interesting people over that period.

Do you believe everything the mainstream media and government tell you?


Quick Reply: The US and guns



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:41 PM.