Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Abortion

Old Jul 23, 2015 | 01:29 PM
  #91  
JTaylor's Avatar
JTaylor
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by DJ Dunk
Having spent 7 months in a NICU recently, I've seen babies born at 24 weeks. One couple that we got to know quite well now have their baby at home who is doing very well. Yes, they needed a lot of major medical intervention and had lots of subsequent issues, but those babies were very much more than a collection of developing cells. They were babies, human beings; strong enough to fight and continue their lives.

Sadly, we also experienced those for whom the fight was too much, but I'm left with no doubt in my mind that at 24 weeks they are very much viable, very much alive, very much a baby in the truest sense.
What are your thoughts on Devildog's assertion his "collection of cells" only develop a "sense of awareness or existence" "from the minute they are born" rather than in the womb? Is that your experience, Dunk? I was under the impression that unborn babies could react to music and other stimulae at a fairly early age.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2015 | 02:27 PM
  #92  
DJ Dunk's Avatar
DJ Dunk
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 17,864
Likes: 0
From: Not all those who wander are lost
Default

In my experience (I'm not a medical practitioner, just someone who's experienced premature births) their sense of 'awareness' can be apparent from as little as 20 weeks, some may say sooner.

A sense of existence is a little more hard to define and I don't think bears any relevance to the subject, personally.

From what I've experienced, 24 weeks is a baby. Not every organ is fully prepared for life on the outside, but it's unquestionably an aware, living being.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2015 | 07:56 PM
  #93  
Beef's Avatar
Beef
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Default

Total support of abortion.

The right to self-determination and body autonomy of the mother must take precedence over all other factors.

24 weeks is a reasonable timeframe - 5 months is more than enough time to make up your mind.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2015 | 09:54 PM
  #94  
markjmd's Avatar
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Beef
Total support of abortion.

The right to self-determination and body autonomy of the mother must take precedence over all other factors.

24 weeks is a reasonable timeframe - 5 months is more than enough time to make up your mind.
If you think it's more than enough time, doesn't that mean you think the limit should be shorter?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 09:57 AM
  #95  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 11:35 AM
  #96  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?
Maybe most people (fortunately) aren't quite as callous as you are?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 11:38 AM
  #97  
Dingdongler's Avatar
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 1
From: In a house
Default

Terminations for real medical reasons can take longer as some tests may come back as being inconclusive etc and need to be repeated or further specialist advice needed.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 12:30 PM
  #98  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

when my wife was pregnant with our 3rd and then 4/5 (twins), she was in her mid/later 30's

so we went privately to the "Fetal Medicine Centre" in London to have an early nuchal scan, (I think 8 odd weeks, may have been twelve)

http://www.fetalmedicine.com/nuchal-scan

you get the results in minutes

no test is 100% but we felt it was worth it

Last edited by hodgy0_2; Jul 24, 2015 at 01:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 01:02 PM
  #99  
Lisawrx's Avatar
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 1
From: Where I am
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?
What happens to a woman that didn't know she was pregnant until quite far along?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 01:41 PM
  #100  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Terminations for real medical reasons can take longer as some tests may come back as being inconclusive etc and need to be repeated or further specialist advice needed.
If the limit is reduced then extensions for the reasons you give should be allowed where appropriate to a cut-off point (which could be the current 24 weeks). Although I'd be interested to know whether there is any time-wasting going on that could be removed instead.

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
What happens to a woman that didn't know she was pregnant until quite far along?
8 weeks is 2 missed menstruations. How many do you need, three for luck? As for the daft bints starving themselves who have irregular cycles, perhaps they should routinely take pregnancy tests if active.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 01:44 PM
  #101  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
Maybe most people (fortunately) aren't quite as callous as you are?
I only wish I had your empathy, my life could be so much more involving/complicated/tiresome.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 02:02 PM
  #102  
Lisawrx's Avatar
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 1
From: Where I am
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
8 weeks is 2 missed menstruations. How many do you need, three for luck? As for the daft bints starving themselves who have irregular cycles, perhaps they should routinely take pregnancy tests if active.
There are various contraceptives which (can)stop periods, including the one I am on. I agree, we could all take regular pregnancy tests if active, but in reality, you just don't. Rightly or wrongly, you just assume the contraception will work, especially if it has been, long term so far.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 04:18 PM
  #103  
Devildog's Avatar
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 1
From: Away from this place
Default

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
There are various contraceptives which (can)stop periods, including the one I am on. I agree, we could all take regular pregnancy tests if active, but in reality, you just don't. Rightly or wrongly, you just assume the contraception will work, especially if it has been, long term so far.


Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 08:42 PM
  #104  
Lisawrx's Avatar
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 1
From: Where I am
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??
Not saying it's common, but it has been known for people to go right through a pregnancy without knowing, until labour of course.

4/5 months, I would imagine would be very possible if the likes of morning sickness was absent. Not every woman puts on a lot of weight during pregnancy, so could be forgiven for just thinking they were just putting a little on, without considering being pregnant as the reason. Again, I'm not saying this is something common, I haven't got figures to support one way or another, but I do know people that have only found out they were pregnant quite far along, also one person who fell pregnant with both her children while using the implant as a form of contraceptive. Bodies are funny things.....
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 09:28 PM
  #105  
vindaloo's Avatar
vindaloo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
From: South Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohot
I'm well aware of that, but it's only one or two blokes, and that's it!
It's not even that.... We keep it in box and pass it around on request.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2015 | 10:36 PM
  #106  
Turbohot's Avatar
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by vindaloo
It's not even that.... We keep it in box and pass it around on request.
That's good to know. Please keep up with this good work, if you may.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 01:42 AM
  #107  
Ooperbum's Avatar
Ooperbum
BANNED
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: ooperbum
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??
10 yeats ago a girl in our village gave birth. She didn't know she was pregnant until she went into labour. She was 14 at the time.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2015 | 02:43 AM
  #108  
brendy76's Avatar
brendy76
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1
From: Bangor Co. Down.
Default

Originally Posted by Ooperbum
10 yeats ago a girl in our village gave birth. She didn't know she was pregnant until she went into labour. She was 14 at the time.
Taking a wild stab in the dark here (and judging by your username), it wasnt you then?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2016 | 09:19 PM
  #109  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,788
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

How odd.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2016 | 10:46 PM
  #110  
wrx300scooby's Avatar
wrx300scooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 6
From: Prostate cancer got me, please get checked guys
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
How odd.
Yorkshire, clearly
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2016 | 11:37 AM
  #111  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

What on earth?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2016 | 11:51 AM
  #112  
Turbohot's Avatar
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Default

I reckon a spam bumped this thread up yesterday, and then others commented on it from #109. Spam post must have been vaped. Or may be, alcazar mistakenly thought that it was the Police thread.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2016 | 02:54 PM
  #113  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohot
I reckon a spam bumped this thread up yesterday, and then others commented on it from #109. Spam post must have been vaped. Or may be, alcazar mistakenly thought that it was the Police thread.
Yeah that was my assumption, Alcazar doesn't strike me as the thread bumping type.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2016 | 03:22 PM
  #114  
Turbohot's Avatar
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
Yeah that was my assumption, Alcazar doesn't strike me as the thread bumping type.
Yes. But it's also possible that he did bump this thread up for no apparent reason and called his own act of doing so- "How odd." Something like talking/commenting on self, I mean.

Anything is possible, when it comes to Sir alcy , you know. I wouldn't be surprised.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM.