Which impreza to buy
I'm sorry to say that 0-60 time on the WR1 is totally unrealistic and has been ever since it got released to the press in 2004, No one has ever got near it, To put it into perspective the JDM Spec-C that has 335/330 has a booked time of 4.2 or 4.3 I forget now...but that car has a faster spooling turbo and is about 100kg lighter.
Last edited by The Pink Ninja; Feb 20, 2015 at 06:47 PM.
I'm sorry to say that 0-60 time on the WR1 is totally unrealistic and has been ever since it got released to the press in 2004, No one has ever got near it, To put it into perspective the JDM Spec-C that has 335/330 has a booked time of 4.2 or 4.3 I forget now...but that car has a faster spooling turbo and is about 100kg lighter.
http://www.autosnout.com/Car-Perform...&EditionID=535
The WR1 is nothing special,its just a narrow track uk.sti painted a nasty colour and with dccd.
A jdm car or Widetrack sti is a better choice in stock form.
As for the 0-60 times etc a custom remap will be far better than the ppp or wr1 map.
A jdm car or Widetrack sti is a better choice in stock form.
As for the 0-60 times etc a custom remap will be far better than the ppp or wr1 map.
4.3 which is 0.5 slower than the superior WR1. I'm only basing it on facts real, defer to people that know more here on the actual foruma.
http://www.autosnout.com/Car-Perform...&EditionID=535
http://www.autosnout.com/Car-Perform...&EditionID=535
Only difference is it has a different map which is still no where near as good as a custom map
Different suspension set up and exhaust. Up-rated fuel pump + DCCD. Obviously a map will get more, but out of the box 316bhp for about 8k what comes close. Its hard to top the WR1..
Widetrack sti
JDM sti
Spec c
The wr1 has the same fuel pump and exhaust as all the PPP equipped sti's
Not worth the premium as it has nothing special apart from a marmite paint job
Im sorry but take your wr1 home, all of the cars fat thomas has mentioned are superior, wr1 is exclusive because of its colour, nothing else and the suspension setup and dccd setup makes it understeer like a cooont
4.3 which is 0.5 slower than the superior WR1. I'm only basing it on facts real, defer to people that know more here on the actual foruma.
http://www.autosnout.com/Car-Perform...&EditionID=535
http://www.autosnout.com/Car-Perform...&EditionID=535
I'm sorry to say that 0-60 time on the WR1 is totally unrealistic and has been ever since it got released to the press in 2004, No one has ever got near it, To put it into perspective the JDM Spec-C that has 335/330 has a booked time of 4.2 or 4.3 I forget now...but that car has a faster spooling turbo and is about 100kg lighter.
Which Spec C had 335/330? As that isnt a stock one.
I didn't say its not a good car,all I said was it's nothing special impreza terms and other models I mentioned are better
My spec-c limited did, ignore the 280ps...it didn't happen on spec-C's 
And there is now way in this world a wr1 can hit 60 in 4.25 seconds...it was a great marketing plan as they had never released a car over the claimed 305 ppp which in reality is closer to 295 on a dyno

And there is now way in this world a wr1 can hit 60 in 4.25 seconds...it was a great marketing plan as they had never released a car over the claimed 305 ppp which in reality is closer to 295 on a dyno
Last edited by The Pink Ninja; Feb 22, 2015 at 03:12 PM.
Hmmmm, that's what I was always led to believe. Until I took my newly imported Spec C to RCM back a few years ago now. It pushed out 276bhp. I said to Olly thats a bit down on power from what it should be? His reply of "They're 280 out the box so this is bang on."
My spec-c limited did, ignore the 280ps...it didn't happen on spec-C's 
And there is now way in this world a wr1 can hit 60 in 4.25 seconds...it was a great marketing plan as they had never released a car over the claimed 305 ppp which in reality is closer to 295 on a dyno

And there is now way in this world a wr1 can hit 60 in 4.25 seconds...it was a great marketing plan as they had never released a car over the claimed 305 ppp which in reality is closer to 295 on a dyno
Sorry my mistake its was 335 after a UK fuel map, They left Japan at 320ps but everthing was still listed as 280ps, I remember Tony Burns having his dynoed over a few years and it averaged 312 from memory
Last edited by The Pink Ninja; Feb 22, 2015 at 04:13 PM.




