Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Two near misses in ten seconds.........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 12:26 PM
  #31  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
I don't doubt it, but from witnessing cyclist behaviour daily I sadly cannot say the same about London cyclists as a species.
London is overcrowded in every sense, the attitudes of everyone is dog eat dog. Hopefully when these segregated cycle highways are completed confrontation will be minimal
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 12:40 PM
  #32  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,787
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

Alcazar said:
Originally Posted by alcazar
But sadly, a larger percentage of both are worse and more arrogant drivers than most car drivers.

Yet they expect, and need, better driving from us........go figure.
And WRXrowdy said:
Complete nonsense clearly written by two of you that have never ridden a motorcycle.

Yes, some bikers clearly should not be on the road, I sometimes shake my head in disbelief at the way some people ride, but they, we, are far more vulnerable than anyone driving a cage. We have to be vigilant and have to have total concentration at all times. In a car, if an animal, or pothole catches us out it is no great drama, but on a bike it can put you on the floor, let alone if someone in a car is daydreaming and pulls out in front of you, or is f*cking about with their stereo and wanders in to your lane.
Now if you look at what I said, and what YOU said, you'll see it's pretty much the same thing.

But I also said that, given the relative numbers of cars, vans, lorries, bikers and cycles on our roads, a greater percentage of those present will be rude, arrogant and aggressive in the biker/cyclist category, despite wanting and needing car, van and lorry drivers to drive carefully round them.

What's wrong with that?
Can you dispute it?

In any given day, I can guarantee I'll have a biker and a cyclist gesture at me when it is them in the wrong.

I DON'T get that every day from car/van/lorry drivers.

Nor do car/van/lorry drivers ride on pavements, ignore red lights and filter up the inside/outside of other vehicles.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 12:58 PM
  #33  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
London is overcrowded in every sense, the attitudes of everyone is dog eat dog. Hopefully when these segregated cycle highways are completed confrontation will be minimal
No, no, no no!!!! London is an idyllic paradise, read the London thread for 'proof' Everyone is lovely and laid back, no trouble at all .... not like those Manchester types
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 12:59 PM
  #34  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Highway code states you should reverse into your drive and leave forward. Construction and use legislation states you should not reverse on a road. If you were to have an accident whilst reversing out of your drive. You wouldn't stand an chance and all the blame would be on you. Same if you are hit from behind. The user behind is presumed at fault
You must have a different Highway Code to me then.

Now if you live on a quiet new development then reversing into your driveway is the preferred option, but then again when you leave there will likely be nobody to worry about whichever direction you are travelling.
If however your driveway is on a road with regular traffic, then reversing into your driveway is only possible when no following traffic is behind. See how popular you become when you stop (hazards on or not) just after your driveway expecting those following to accomodate you.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 01:16 PM
  #35  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
15 Year Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
You must have a different Highway Code to me then.

Now if you live on a quiet new development then reversing into your driveway is the preferred option, but then again when you leave there will likely be nobody to worry about whichever direction you are travelling.
If however your driveway is on a road with regular traffic, then reversing into your driveway is only possible when no following traffic is behind. See how popular you become when you stop (hazards on or not) just after your driveway expecting those following to accomodate you.
Get one of these.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 01:20 PM
  #36  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

That'd work but London is probably the only place where people who would benefit from it could justify the cost of buying it.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 01:30 PM
  #37  
legb4rsk's Avatar
legb4rsk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
From: If you're not braking or accelerating you're wasting time.
Default

My driving instructor gave me the best advise.He said that everyone else on the road was a homicidal maniac trying to kill you & that road signs & white lines don't have force fields attached.

It's worked for me so far bearing in mind most of my working life was spent driving in London & around the UK every day.I haven't been hit or hit another road user.

Last edited by legb4rsk; Feb 9, 2015 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 02:56 PM
  #38  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
You must have a different Highway Code to me then.

Now if you live on a quiet new development then reversing into your driveway is the preferred option, but then again when you leave there will likely be nobody to worry about whichever direction you are travelling.
If however your driveway is on a road with regular traffic, then reversing into your driveway is only possible when no following traffic is behind. See how popular you become when you stop (hazards on or not) just after your driveway expecting those following to accomodate you.
Your argument fails. It's safer to reverse into your own drive than reverse out onto a busy road. The traffic behind has to wait patiently for you to do the reverse into your drive, less hassle than trying to reverse into a busy street.

Again no one is is prepared to accommodate anybody else, intolerance!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 05:10 PM
  #39  
WRXrowdy's Avatar
WRXrowdy
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by JGlanzaV
To be honest, what do you expect to happen while filtering? Especially past commercial vehicles....

Had some bellend on a motorbike trying to filter at a junction when you can go straight on or left. I indicated left, checking mirrors etc as he cut across from behind me and tried to under take. He ran up the kerb and started giving me verbal. It is the cyclists and motorcyclists duty to take more care, as sometimes it is impossible to see you.

Or how about, wait in the ****ing queue like everyone else, then no one can pull out on you. ****ing idiots the lot of em.

, you are only visible for a split second on a commercial vehicle, even when checking blind spots etc. Especially down the off side. Yet some many idiots try and filter down the offside and complain when large vehicles don't see you....
I think someone needs to go and read the Highway Code, or speak to a bike copper, it is perfectly legal to filter in traffic on a motorcycle. Or, are you one of those people that get envy when a bike filters passed and you are stuck in traffic?

Commercial vehicles, yep, used to drive them for twenty years, well aware of blind spots on them, but, completely irrelevant to the situation that I was talking about. Filtering on the outside of traffic, a car just decided to turn right without checking their mirror or signalling, you do check your mirror when you turn don't you?

I agree that when filtering it is the bikers responsibility to make sure it is safe, but it is also car drivers responsibility to make sure any manoeuvres they carry out are safe too, or do you disagree?

Edit: you are right about bikers filtering on the inside of lorries etc at junctions though, asking for trouble imo

Last edited by WRXrowdy; Feb 9, 2015 at 05:13 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 05:21 PM
  #40  
WRXrowdy's Avatar
WRXrowdy
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Alcazar said:

And WRXrowdy said:

Now if you look at what I said, and what YOU said, you'll see it's pretty much the same thing.

But I also said that, given the relative numbers of cars, vans, lorries, bikers and cycles on our roads, a greater percentage of those present will be rude, arrogant and aggressive in the biker/cyclist category, despite wanting and needing car, van and lorry drivers to drive carefully round them.

What's wrong with that?
Can you dispute it?

In any given day, I can guarantee I'll have a biker and a cyclist gesture at me when it is them in the wrong.

I DON'T get that every day from car/van/lorry drivers.

Nor do car/van/lorry drivers ride on pavements, ignore red lights and filter up the inside/outside of other vehicles.
Can I dispute it, probably not, you do see bikers gesture other road users if they feel that they have been endangered. Many bikers are also car drivers, whether they gesture less in a car could be related to the fact that they don't feel that they have been put in as much danger in the relative safety of being in a car, maybe it is because any gesture a biker makes will be a whole lot more visible than it would be if they made the same gesture in a car.

Personally, I don't really gesture when on the bike, maybe shake my head a little if I feel someone has done something wrong. Probably more articulate when I'm driving a car if I'm honest.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 06:08 PM
  #41  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Your argument fails. It's safer to reverse into your own drive than reverse out onto a busy road. The traffic behind has to wait patiently for you to do the reverse into your drive, less hassle than trying to reverse into a busy street.

Again no one is is prepared to accommodate anybody else, intolerance!
My argument fails? Do you deal in reality or only theory?

This is what will happen in reality - the car wishing to reverse into the driveway will slow down and stop a few metres past the entrance, either indicating left or with hazards on. The car behind will stop one metre from the rear of the first car wanting to reverse and then the next car behind will do the same. Game over.
The only way your Utopian dream becomes a reality is if the car wanting to reverse manages to stop quick enough to bang it in reverse and hope the following vehicle twigs when they see the reversing light, rather than crash into the back of them.
It'd be even more impractical if the driveway was on the opposite side of the road.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 06:17 PM
  #42  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
My argument fails? Do you deal in reality or only theory?

This is what will happen in reality - the car wishing to reverse into the driveway will slow down and stop a few metres past the entrance, either indicating left or with hazards on. The car behind will stop one metre from the rear of the first car wanting to reverse and then the next car behind will do the same. Game over.
The only way your Utopian dream becomes a reality is if the car wanting to reverse manages to stop quick enough to bang it in reverse and hope the following vehicle twigs when they see the reversing light, rather than crash into the back of them.
It'd be even more impractical if the driveway was on the opposite side of the road.
I feel sorry for where you live. Every driver must be an @rsehole who doesn't/can't read a maneuver when it's unfolding before their very eyes. I don't have issues reversing into parking bays or drives. Again you are highlighting intolerance of basic simple driving methods.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 06:33 PM
  #43  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
I feel sorry for where you live. Every driver must be an @rsehole who doesn't/can't read a maneuver when it's unfolding before their very eyes. I don't have issues reversing into parking bays or drives. Again you are highlighting intolerance of basic simple driving methods.
As it goes I live on a farm with loads of room, but it's not always that easy for everyone. The point I'm making is that although it is preferable to pull onto the road forwards it's not always possible. I spend a lot of time driving in cities and it is very common when stationary indicating to turn left, either to drive in forwards or reverse in backwards, to have pedestrians and pushbikes continue to pass on the inside preventing the manoeuvre.
Ultimately some people are clueless whatever method of transport they happen to be using. In my experience road users who have experience on multiple platforms (e.g. drives a car, rides a motorcycle and rides a pushbike) or those who have had additional training (ROSPA, IAM etc) are leagues ahead of all the rest.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 08:56 PM
  #44  
WRXrowdy's Avatar
WRXrowdy
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 97
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire

This is what will happen in reality - the car wishing to reverse into the driveway will slow down and stop a few metres past the entrance, either indicating left or with hazards on. The car behind will stop one metre from the rear of the first car wanting to reverse and then the next car behind will do the same. Game over.
Or you do what I do, stop just before my driveway, car behind stops, I put hazards on and pull forwards and across the road, then reverse into my drive.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 09:13 PM
  #45  
boomer's Avatar
boomer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Highway code states you should reverse into your drive and leave forward. Construction and use legislation states you should not reverse on a road. If you were to have an accident whilst reversing out of your drive. You wouldn't stand an chance and all the blame would be on you. Same if you are hit from behind. The user behind is presumed at fault
The Highway Code is not "the law", and "should" is not "must" - but then a cyclist wouldn't know the difference

Also, could your elaborate on the C&U legislation regarding reversing onto a road (any road?)?

mb
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 09:27 PM
  #46  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,787
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

On the road where my vehicle entrance is, for 90% of the day it would be relatively easy to reverse in.

For an hour or so morning and evening, when it's used as a school rat run, impossible.

And that's a relatively quiet estate road.

God only knows how folk who live on heavily used roads would cope.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 11:47 PM
  #47  
Tony Harrington's Avatar
Tony Harrington
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1
From: Wigan
Default

Originally Posted by SiPie
I've got cycle insurance Tony so can't help I'm afraid.
That is reassuring but how many cyclist are as responsible as you. Hats off!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 11:48 PM
  #48  
Tony Harrington's Avatar
Tony Harrington
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1
From: Wigan
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Reversing onto a road is illegal and extreme caution should be taken by the vehicle user. Priorty is given to the user's on the highway and off road vehicle has to wait for clear road before entering path or road. There is no insurance requirements, but I have cover through my cycling membership

Again complete intolerance to slow or stop for vulnerable road users
Thank you I have learned something from this post.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 06:56 AM
  #49  
nik52wrx's Avatar
nik52wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Default

I am
Insured through Britsh Cycling for £30 a year, comes with £1m third party cover so if I hit your car you're covered
Most of the lads I cycle with have it too so it annoys me that the phrase 'Most' cyclists are irresponsible etc etc....


Originally Posted by Tony Harrington
That is reassuring but how many cyclist are as responsible as you. Hats off!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 08:41 AM
  #50  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by boomer
The Highway Code is not "the law", and "should" is not "must" - but then a cyclist wouldn't know the difference

Also, could your elaborate on the C&U legislation regarding reversing onto a road (any road?)?

mb
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1986/1078/regulation/106/made

When used in the context of could you have entered the road forward or is reverse is your only option.

Highway code is good practice methods to minimise accident and increase your an others road users safety

Last edited by andy97; Feb 10, 2015 at 08:42 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 05:34 PM
  #51  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Ilegal to reverse out of your driveway. I spent 20yrs reversing out of a driveway onto a busy main road and the last 9yrs doing it at my new place but no traffic there except people that live on the street.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 10:25 PM
  #52  
boomer's Avatar
boomer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1986/1078/regulation/106/made

When used in the context of could you have entered the road forward or is reverse is your only option.

Highway code is good practice methods to minimise accident and increase your an others road users safety
...so just to confirm, reversing onto a road is not illegal and "Construction and use legislation" does not state that "you should not reverse on a road", unlike what you said in post 22 and 24?

mb
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 10:55 PM
  #53  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

I'm still laughing about that now. Must be millions of motorists breaking the law every day.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
dpb
Non Scooby Related
14
Oct 3, 2015 10:37 AM
alcazar
Computer & Technology Related
2
Sep 29, 2015 07:18 PM
hedgecutter
General Technical
3
Sep 25, 2015 02:35 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 PM.