Of course, but not solely at you, was it? You are not the only superb7tch on the planet, are you?

I mean, what exactly do you think; telling people to man up etc., eh? That people are frightened of you, and that's why they beat about the Christmas tree, and don't say to you directly what they really think? Do you think they're worried that you can verbally chew them and spit them out, like you practically do with the dead flies on regular basis, hm??? Come on! Smell that Asaam tea of yours, wake up and make me one for me as well while you're at it, f1_fan. Go on. Tha v. muchy.

 

I'm sure he's bricking it

 

You've never managed it in here so I'd doubt it very much

 

I thought you'd gone into hiding incase fanny chewed you up.

 

I must admit a little bit of poo did come out at the sight of his threat and I've been in counselling all weekend

 

Funny how the person who says he hates football seems to do the most talking about it.

 

Bloody Football* fans at it again


http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...-state-n284976

 

Google soccer violence then Google college football violence and see which gets the most hits. Then do one and stop being in denial about the sick stupid sport you choose to follow that even celebrates its violent culture in the movies FFS!

 

That's not Football though.

 

Lots of films celebrate violence and violent culture and have nothing to do with football.

 

Check post 72 then you'll understand the irony of post 187.........

Then you're free to carry on with your futile mutterings

 

Stop being in denial, until then **** off

 

Funnily enough, I noticed that too. The other thing I noticed was that it generally tends to be film companies that make movies about football, not football fans, football clubs, or football organizational bodies

 

Well violent films obviously aren't F1_Fans thing

 

I have been told in no uncertain terms by the mods that I am to ignore you so either do the same or you will get what should have come to you a week or so ago when you decided to state that I laughed at kids with cancer.

As for your comment here you are utterly clueless to the point being made so that's two reasons why you should STFU!

 

Er, the point is films are made about it and done so in a way more or less celebrating it. I haven't seen any films about crowd violence in any other sport. Surely even you can now appreciate the point being made.

 

Pulp fiction shows a man being raped before the rapist is shot. His gimp if I remember rightly is stabbed by a samurai sword. Marvin getting shot in the face before Vincent vega and jules have to pick bits of his brain up isn't a celebration of violence at all lol. Football factory and green street etc have about as much to do with football as pulp fiction has to do with snooker.

There is an ignore option in your user settings if what I say gets under your skin.

 

Back on form, I see.

 

Say what you like, but just don't tell lies like last time! When you've been outgunned in an argument it's best to shut up rather than start making sick crap up. If it had been up to me you'd have been banned, but Lisa let you off..... yes the very same Lisa who you say is in some sort of clique with me! Maybe I should have started some sort of 'crusade' thread in policy eh?

 

You should take Lisa's advice. The ignore option will help to stop you getting so wound up.

 

And you shouldn't resort to telling sick lies about people to try and score points!

As for getting wound up I seem to remember an 11 page thread in policy to which you were the major contributor just because I used the word retarded

I think I can feel another use for it coming on.

 

Here's an example of how to ignore someone....

 

Have you got some kids Kwik?

 

Fail.

Marcellus Wallace and Butch both had snooker ball gags on!





lol

 

Damn it! Should have said cricket lol.

 

I guess they could be the red pool *****, though...

 

It doesn't matter. It is conclusive proof that snooker and pool is watched by violent thugs.

 

Well it probably is as I expect some people who watch it are football fans too. After all they are fairly simple games to understand so they suit most football fans who need things to be simple to understand them!

 

 

I don't about that Chris. The offside rule used to be simple. Now it's so convoluted it's genuinely difficult to get if a team's beef is justified or not, even with a so-called expert panel on hand to break it down after. I don't know if the rule was created to make the sport seem more difficult than it is to the masses, or simply to keep the 6 figure salary of a "Rule Development Director safe.

Typical conversation:
Person 1. "Hang on. That was offside".
Person 2. "Well, actually it wasn't. Basically, Fazio's left sock was half mast causing him to bend over to pull it back up. As his torso was technically forward of Ambrosia's Quiff and as Fido Diddlyo is taking a selfie, albeit between Fazio and Quim, you can clearly see Ambrosia at this point is onside as the ball technically fell to his feet at this moment after a poorly executed clearance by Card Trick. Although Ambrosia was having a chat about underwear sales with Quim and Quim in-turn with him about his upcoming Cologne Deal he's not in active play therefore onside.
Person 1: "Oh yeah, yeah of course, he wasn't active. Yeah mate, my mistake. Oh well."
Subsequent football highlights show panel will then spend 20minutes debunking the expert view of person 2 therefore rendering person 1 to be correct.

In the old days it would have been.
Person 1: "Hang on, that was offside!"
Person 2: "Marginal that mate. Anyway, who gives a ****?! We're 4-0 down!"
Subsequent football highlights show panel will then show a video replay with the bright yellow line clearly showing striker to be offside before declaring "Oh well, matters not. They were **** all day and 3-0 would have been generous of them!" All dealt with in a few minutes.

It's like we need to have something else to moan about.