When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The British justice system works relatively well for peasants like you and I, however the more powerful you are then the injustices don't even go as far as a courthouse door.
You or I would end up in court and fined for non tv licence, not paying council tax or similar, but mr blair the biggest war criminal of our generation and mass murderer of innocent civilians is living a very wealthy life of luxury. Wait a minute??? Never, can't be true lol
Last edited by stipete75; Jun 26, 2014 at 09:21 PM.
Its not just about the jury, but also throwing out evidence that could sway them before the jury even gets to see or here it, then discredit anything remaining with careful wording and interpretation.
I very much doubt there was any need for corruption was required by friends in high places; If there was any evidence, it would have been destroyed before the police even came calling.
Yes, but People like Ding (or whatever his new username is after his latest supposed identity theft as allegedly that is the reason he changes usernames ) can't wait to jump to the defence of his mates the Tories before thinking things through in a more logical manner and realising that just maybe some people aren't exactly accusing the PM of directly threatening the jury!
Yes, but People like Ding (or whatever his new username is after his latest supposed identity theft as allegedly that is the reason he changes usernames _
but mr blair the biggest war criminal of our generation and mass murderer of innocent civilians is living a very wealthy life of luxury.
What crimes did he commit exactly?
Re the phone hacking: I havn't studied the case enough to give an opinion one way or another to be honest. My guess is that there was grounds for reasonable doubt.
Re the phone hacking: I havn't studied the case enough to give an opinion one way or another to be honest. My guess is that there was grounds for reasonable doubt.
Where you making the point that the thread has gone off topic
With regards to phone hacking and Blair, were you alluding to Blairs only involvement was giving Rebecca Brooks and Murdoch advice, hence he has grounds for reasonable doubt.
Last edited by Carnut; Jun 27, 2014 at 06:56 PM.
Reason: typo