Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Britain has really become a laughing stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 May 2014, 05:29 PM
  #31  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix.
If you think i spend 90% of my time on motorists, then you don't know how the police work at all
He forgot to add in the 25% spent on "altering" statements.
Old 24 May 2014, 05:45 PM
  #32  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohot
The land was originally seized, but that seized land was further turned into a commodity, I get that. As a result, the land continues to be bought and sold, so is the bricks and mortar house on top of it. This is what happens in this century. Land is a commodity. It's not free, it's bound by the limitations as countries, states, provinces, cities, towns, villages, colonies and private land pieces with or without the houses on them.

So in today's times, one has to buy the land with their hard-earned money in order to make a BTL house. Land doesn't come free anymore. So I can't see how it is slavery?
It was turned into a commodity by nothing but a slight of hand. No labour was put in constructing the institution of private property. It is totally contingent and 'artificial'.

You could equally well use that argument to support 'air breathing licenses'; you say that air has been turned into a commodity and that is the law, air licence owners have worked hard to buy their licenses it is their 'right' to charge rent. Exactly the same arguments were used to justify slavery.

The slave owner exploits the slave just like the landowner exploits their tenants. Both live off the sweat of others whilst doing nothing substantive, except making a move in a financial game.
Old 24 May 2014, 05:55 PM
  #33  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Oh for the return of serfdom.

Old 24 May 2014, 05:58 PM
  #34  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
It was turned into a commodity by nothing but a slight of hand. No labour was put in constructing the institution of private property. It is totally contingent and 'artificial'.

You could equally well use that argument to support 'air breathing licenses'; you say that air has been turned into a commodity and that is the law, air licence owners have worked hard to buy their licenses it is their 'right' to charge rent. Exactly the same arguments were used to justify slavery.

The slave owner exploits the slave just like the landowner exploits their tenants. Both live off the sweat of others whilst doing nothing substantive, except making a move in a financial game.

Hm, institutionalised form of slavery, then. The foundations reek of slavery and the chain reaction goes on. (no pun intended by the word 'chain')

Thank you, TDW.
Old 24 May 2014, 06:02 PM
  #35  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbohot
Hm, institutionalised form of slavery, then. The foundations reek of slavery and the chain reaction goes on. (no pun intended by the word 'chain')

Thank you, TDW.
Some hyperbole on my part but rent seeking elites are indefensible. At least Capital is productive and creates wealth. Owning land is just pure domination.
Old 24 May 2014, 06:04 PM
  #36  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
It was turned into a commodity by nothing but a slight of hand. No labour was put in constructing the institution of private property. It is totally contingent and 'artificial'.

You could equally well use that argument to support 'air breathing licenses'; you say that air has been turned into a commodity and that is the law, air licence owners have worked hard to buy their licenses it is their 'right' to charge rent. Exactly the same arguments were used to justify slavery.

The slave owner exploits the slave just like the landowner exploits their tenants. Both live off the sweat of others whilst doing nothing substantive, except making a move in a financial game.
Just follow the French. When someone gets too rich, or big for their boots, chop off their head and start again.
Old 24 May 2014, 06:13 PM
  #37  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix.
I thought it would be blamed on the police at some point. Wasn't the prosecution brought by the police in the first place!!!!

If you think i spend 90% of my time on motorists, then you don't know how the police work at all
You should try and chill sometimes felix and not take it all personally.

I have no axe to grind with the Police they're just foot soldiers and do their masters biding.

I feel for you puppy.
Old 24 May 2014, 06:16 PM
  #38  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Some hyperbole on my part but rent seeking elites are indefensible. At least Capital is productive and creates wealth. Owning land is just pure domination.

Also, if people could build castles in the air to rent, sell or live, I think they would have seized and commodified air as well. Some do; metaphorically. I mean, dream merchants.
Old 24 May 2014, 06:22 PM
  #39  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Rent is always money for not doing something. In this case not exercising a right to kick someone out of the house you own.

That the right costs money to purchase (unless you inherit it) is purely contingent. When you live off the labour of your tenants the substantive relationship (which is masked by the cash relationship) is completely exploitative, safe for minor costs of maintenance and so on and so forth which is just a small part of the rent.

By your logic if I had to pay you rent to breath air in Manchester then you would be 'earning' that money and running a 'business'. But what wealth is created?
You are very entertaining i'll give you that.

It's a cruel world we live in, and you make your living by extracting oil from the land mostly in very poor countries with corrupt governments.

How do you sleep at night "earning" your living from the misery and exploitation of others?

You live in a glass house TDW, not wise to throw stones.
Old 24 May 2014, 07:30 PM
  #40  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd be interested to know your response to Ditchy's question but have one for you as well please Tony.

Let's say you owned your own home, by your own admission you've been looking to buy. Now let's say work takes you abroad for a three year contract. Would you never ever consider renting the property out whilst you were out of the country?
Old 24 May 2014, 08:03 PM
  #41  
DYK
Scooby Regular
 
DYK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scooby Planet
Posts: 5,824
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Its damn disgusting.And some wonder why UKIP are becoming more popular..
Old 25 May 2014, 04:11 AM
  #42  
Felix.
Scooby Regular
 
Felix.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster

do their masters biding........
Am i some sort of Sith now.....
Old 25 May 2014, 06:23 AM
  #43  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
I'd be interested to know your response to Ditchy's question but have one for you as well please Tony.

Let's say you owned your own home, by your own admission you've been looking to buy. Now let's say work takes you abroad for a three year contract. Would you never ever consider renting the property out whilst you were out of the country?
Nah, he'd install some desperate eastern European family let um stay for nothing and chip in for food and leccy. Cos that's how generous he is
Old 25 May 2014, 06:36 AM
  #44  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Felix.
Am i some sort of Sith now.....
I suppose in a way you are yes, all participants are cut from the same cloth, trivialising, ridiculing or demonising those that are able to see things for what they are will never change the reality.
Old 25 May 2014, 10:07 AM
  #45  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SNet's own Tooting Popular Front is back in action I see

Get over it Wolfie, nothing will ever change.

Jealousy is a horrible thing.
Old 25 May 2014, 10:20 AM
  #46  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
SNet's own Tooting Popular Front is back in action I see

Get over it Wolfie, nothing will ever change.

Jealousy is a horrible thing.
I sort of get Tony's take on this. This board has a section of members who like to indirectly tell the rest of us how well off they are and most of them seem to be landlords in one form or another. I think Tony's attack on the source of their wealth is a little extreme, but it does have some validity and anyway it certainly seems to push their buttons the way their comments obviously push his so fair play to him.
Old 25 May 2014, 10:37 AM
  #47  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
You are very entertaining i'll give you that.

It's a cruel world we live in, and you make your living by extracting oil from the land mostly in very poor countries with corrupt governments.

How do you sleep at night "earning" your living from the misery and exploitation of others?

You live in a glass house TDW, not wise to throw stones.
You don't use petroleum products?
Old 25 May 2014, 10:39 AM
  #48  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
I'd be interested to know your response to Ditchy's question but have one for you as well please Tony.

Let's say you owned your own home, by your own admission you've been looking to buy. Now let's say work takes you abroad for a three year contract. Would you never ever consider renting the property out whilst you were out of the country?
Maybe, but it's not the same as the 'aspiration' to own someone elses home so you can take the food from their table, aka BTL
Old 25 May 2014, 11:26 AM
  #49  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
I sort of get Tony's take on this. This board has a section of members who like to indirectly tell the rest of us how well off they are and most of them seem to be landlords in one form or another. I think Tony's attack on the source of their wealth is a little extreme, but it does have some validity and anyway it certainly seems to push their buttons the way their comments obviously push his so fair play to him.
For the avoidance of doubt, I'm not a landlord.

I own some land but there's only sheep on it at the moment (Wolfie's welcome to come and have a go)

Wolfie just goes a little too far comparing BTL with slave masters etc.... he can bleat on all he likes but we live in a capitalist society, have done for centuries, and nothing will ever, ever change that.


He'll give himself a coronary lying awake at night, crying into his Ragged Trousered Philanthropist, wondering what his little one man crusade can do to put things right for the down-trodden of society.

Anyway, I'm off to church now to chuck a quid in the pot for the Unemployed Immigrant Gay / Lesbian Dwarf Outreach Project...
Old 25 May 2014, 11:50 AM
  #50  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
Wolfie just goes a little too far comparing BTL with slave masters etc.... he can bleat on all he likes but we live in a capitalist society, have done for centuries, and nothing will ever, ever change that.
What is Capitalist about land?
Old 25 May 2014, 12:10 PM
  #51  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm a private landowner, therefore I can trade it and make a profit.

Taken me off your ignore list now?
How sweet.
Old 25 May 2014, 02:38 PM
  #52  
Carnut
Scooby Regular
 
Carnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'll check my gps
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that in the early days when the world was starting to be ruled by groups that then became seen as royalty it was a time of slavery. The land was anybody's and everybody's and these people such as the monarchy that we have to day were nothing more than bullies. How dare they threaten and kill then tell all that the land is theirs then have the bare faced cheek to offer it back to us for a fee. IMO the royal family are one of the biggest criminal families in the world that top any car theft by stealing no less than countries.

Or......at least that's how I believe it used to be, in actual fact I think that we have moved away from them days and in fact benefit from the order and discipline. The land is now sheared out some what more equally and we all have the opportunity to own are own. Luck is not always handed out in equal measures but i see nothing wrong with the average Joe being able to put down his own stamp in life in the form of a few properties. The **** that come along and buy up lots of properties and hold tenants by the ***** though need shooting.
Old 25 May 2014, 03:30 PM
  #53  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Land is a big thing. Even after the death, some like to claim a bit of it for their underground resting with their individualised grave territories on the surface. I wish earth was officially layered, so that one could only claim the resting space in the particular layer of the depth; free of charge. Other layers and top bit could still be utilised by all and sundry. Not to necessarily live on that land (that could freak some out), but by growing fruitful trees on top etc.
Old 25 May 2014, 07:02 PM
  #54  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chris j t
I think that in the early days when the world was starting to be ruled by groups that then became seen as royalty it was a time of slavery. The land was anybody's and everybody's and these people such as the monarchy that we have to day were nothing more than bullies. How dare they threaten and kill then tell all that the land is theirs then have the bare faced cheek to offer it back to us for a fee. IMO the royal family are one of the biggest criminal families in the world that top any car theft by stealing no less than countries.
Why the negative slant? Some people are leaders and some people are followers, it's always been the way.
Old 25 May 2014, 07:35 PM
  #55  
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Dingdongler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a house
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Maybe, but it's not the same as the 'aspiration' to own someone elses home so you can take the food from their table, aka BTL


So in the right circumstances you would be happy to be a 'rentier' then?
Old 25 May 2014, 08:13 PM
  #56  
Carnut
Scooby Regular
 
Carnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'll check my gps
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
Why the negative slant? Some people are leaders and some people are followers, it's always been the way.
I thought that I turned it round at the end.
I agree, leaders will lead and followers will follow which I think brings balance but that's not to say its always fair.
Old 25 May 2014, 08:36 PM
  #57  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
I sort of get Tony's take on this. This board has a section of members who like to indirectly tell the rest of us how well off they are and most of them seem to be landlords in one form or another. I think Tony's attack on the source of their wealth is a little extreme, but it does have some validity and anyway it certainly seems to push their buttons the way their comments obviously push his so fair play to him.
I'm by no means well off, i'm a council estate kid that made a couple of smart moves that paid off ok ish after many years hard graft and still grafting now to give may son a better start than I had, I don't rent any properties and never have.

As far as i'm concerned tdw is just mr sour grapes because he was jollying his way around the world making good money thinking he was the man but didn't cover all his bases and now it's come back to haunt him in the form of having a wedge of cash that's not enough to buy a terraced house, tuff **** he made his bed and now he's lying in it.

Life's a mother ****** get over it and get on with it.
Old 25 May 2014, 08:39 PM
  #58  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
You don't use petroleum products?
How quickly the worm turns.

You should move into politics, as it's obviously in your field of expertise, people exploitation.
Old 25 May 2014, 08:56 PM
  #59  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
I'm by no means well off, i'm a council estate kid that made a couple of smart moves that paid off ok ish after many years hard graft and still grafting now to give may son a better start than I had, I don't rent any properties and never have.

As far as i'm concerned tdw is just mr sour grapes because he was jollying his way around the world making good money thinking he was the man but didn't cover all his bases and now it's come back to haunt him in the form of having a wedge of cash that's not enough to buy a terraced house, tuff **** he made his bed and now he's lying in it.

Life's a mother ****** get over it and get on with it.
Well maybe he will have to rent a property off the 'considerably richer than yow' brigade on here then
Old 25 May 2014, 08:57 PM
  #60  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
So in the right circumstances you would be happy to be a 'rentier' then?
I think owning your home is different that owning a home for purposes of dipping your hand into someone else's pocket.


Quick Reply: Britain has really become a laughing stock



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.