Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Want to kick the Tories where it hurts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 11:14 AM
  #91  
ALi-B's Avatar
ALi-B
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
Default

Originally Posted by pslewis
Did you miss the part where I said that, this year only, the Tories will borrow MORE than in the WHOLE of the last Labour Government?

Yes, train crash indeed ........
I can't see how voting for any party let alone UKIP, yeah they can fix a few holes here and there but overall the situation we are in now is the effect of factors that were badly dealt with constantly over the past 20odd years.

The damage is done. This country is a cat-b write off. The best we can ever do now is salvage bits off it.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 12:59 PM
  #92  
warrenm2's Avatar
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
From: Epsom
Default

Been having sporadic internet access so only just seen this. The "talking about immigration is racist" is so 2010, things have moved on big time since then, especially with Labour apologising for messing it up. We do need immigration - of good quality people though. What we have at the moment is no sorting of wheat from chaff. And that is what UKIP propose. Hardly controversial. The issue of native people not working is a separate issue to do with benefits.

As for how things are cat b write off now, things can be turned round in two sessions of Gvmt, look at the turn around after the Labour disaster of the 70s, read up on New Zealand in the mid 80s, it is possible with the right ideas.

Finally, as for UKIP being composed of BNP'ers - that is so wrong its almost actionable. UKIP are the only party that ban ex-BNP members from joining, which is more than can be said for Labour. Suggesting otherwise is a flimsy, transparent and pathetic smear. What are you so afraid of?

I shall be voting UKIP and am proud of it, the other 3 parties have a track record of letting this country down, its time to change things for the better with UKIP. As Pete says, people will be surprised at the amount of votes they get at the European AND LOCAL elections next month
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 01:16 PM
  #93  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

What are UKIP planning to do with the millions of EU workers who are currently here?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 01:34 PM
  #94  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,787
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

You mean the ones YOUR lot let in en-masse as some sort of sociological experiment and to shove it to the right wingers?

Nothing...........to late for that, but no more.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 01:46 PM
  #95  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
You mean the ones YOUR lot let in en-masse as some sort of sociological experiment and to shove it to the right wingers?

Nothing...........to late for that, but no more.
Don't be daft
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 02:33 PM
  #96  
Carnut's Avatar
Carnut
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
From: I'll check my gps
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Australia has a mining boom, nothing to do with keeping out half dozen foreign johnies

New Zealand successful? , ok, if you say so
You think that one of the most up and coming and wealthy country's in the world doesn't have problems keeping out foreign johnies . The city's are full of Asians and in suits not overalls ready for a days mining. The point I am making is that they have strict broader control but still manage to have diversity which benefits the country. And the fact that it does have a mining boom just proves my point that there able to trade successfully with other country's (they sell what they mine abroad ) while sill maintaining strict boarders. All country's have to trade in and out to be successful and UKIP no this but believe it can still be done with good broader control.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 03:31 PM
  #97  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

A few grammatical errors there , if you don't mind me saying

Ukip want to keep out rest of Europe, afaik. Trouble is we will then have to pull back all our own on the continent.

Australia is growing wealthy on flogging ore to China , I don't know how many jobs going for the indigenous though
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 08:13 PM
  #98  
Carnut's Avatar
Carnut
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
From: I'll check my gps
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
A few grammatical errors there , if you don't mind me saying

Ukip want to keep out rest of Europe, afaik. Trouble is we will then have to pull back all our own on the continent.

Australia is growing wealthy on flogging ore to China , I don't know how many jobs going for the indigenous though
UKIP don't want to keep out rest of Europe, they just want to keep the s**t out .

And what's your point about Australia got to do with what I said . I am just saying that they are a growing and wealthy country that manage there boarders well. And Australia don't just trade ore,like many if not all they trade and import everything from food/clothing /cars/electronics and so on and have no need to buddy up with other countrys. It maybe to late but wouldn't it be good if we had our own back bone industry like I don't know manufacturing.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 08:42 PM
  #99  
Dingdongler's Avatar
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 1
From: In a house
Default

Originally Posted by warrenm2
Been having sporadic internet access so only just seen this. The "talking about immigration is racist" is so 2010, things have moved on big time since then, especially with Labour apologising for messing it up. We do need immigration - of good quality people though. What we have at the moment is no sorting of wheat from chaff. And that is what UKIP propose. Hardly controversial. The issue of native people not working is a separate issue to do with benefits.

As for how things are cat b write off now, things can be turned round in two sessions of Gvmt, look at the turn around after the Labour disaster of the 70s, read up on New Zealand in the mid 80s, it is possible with the right ideas.

Finally, as for UKIP being composed of BNP'ers - that is so wrong its almost actionable. UKIP are the only party that ban ex-BNP members from joining, which is more than can be said for Labour. Suggesting otherwise is a flimsy, transparent and pathetic smear. What are you so afraid of?

I shall be voting UKIP and am proud of it, the other 3 parties have a track record of letting this country down, its time to change things for the better with UKIP. As Pete says, people will be surprised at the amount of votes they get at the European AND LOCAL elections next month

Will you vote for UKIP in the general election?
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 11:01 PM
  #100  
Spudgun GTR's Avatar
Spudgun GTR
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

voting ukip, now and at the general election
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 11:34 PM
  #101  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Will you vote for UKIP in the general election?
At near 46 years old, I find the thought of voting has never been as disheartening as now.
I may well vote UKIP this May to give the rest the finger, rather than for their policies.
As for the General Election, how disheartening can it get? Historically I have voted Conservative, but this isn't any Conservative party I recognise. Probably hasn't been since 1996. Tempting as it is not to vote at all, they'll more than likely get my vote (with gritted teeth) purely because it'll be one more vote to stop Labour.
Apart from UKIP they're all way too touchy-feely for my taste but UKIP, much like the Greens, are somewhat difficult to take seriously when you look closely.
There are a lot of goldfish around, so what worries me most is the prospect of another Labour government.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2014 | 11:59 PM
  #102  
chocolate_o_brian's Avatar
chocolate_o_brian
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 21,415
Likes: 0
From: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
At near 46 years old, I find the thought of voting has never been as disheartening as now.
I may well vote UKIP this May to give the rest the finger, rather than for their policies.
As for the General Election, how disheartening can it get? Historically I have voted Conservative, but this isn't any Conservative party I recognise. Probably hasn't been since 1996. Tempting as it is not to vote at all, they'll more than likely get my vote (with gritted teeth) purely because it'll be one more vote to stop Labour.
Apart from UKIP they're all way too touchy-feely for my taste but UKIP, much like the Greens, are somewhat difficult to take seriously when you look closely.
There are a lot of goldfish around, so what worries me most is the prospect of another Labour government.
This is my way of thinking too currently.

I don't 100% agree with any party but my ideals fall mostly on that of the Conservatives, so I'll vote for them.

Again, anything, absolutely anything to stop another Labour government getting into power. Jesus ******* Christ on a bike!
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 10:56 AM
  #103  
Dr Hu's Avatar
Dr Hu
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 28
From: Shropshire
Default

All 3 main parties are now flinging as much **** as possible on anyone UKIP in an attempt to damage/smear the party - thing is the more **** they fling, the more it shows them up to be running scared of the 'man on the street's views - even the commentators are saying that UKIP are shrugging off the **** deluge, and coming out smelling ever stronger of roses. All that fertiliser just makes them grow stronger.

The political parties have majorly lost touch with the average joe...
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #104  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,787
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Don't be daft

What? They didn't let them in?

In wasn't a sociological experiment?

It wasn't to "stick it to the right wing?"

All three from ex-Labour ministers/spin doctors.

I'm sorry Martin, "No it isn't, No it doesn't, No it won't" arguing cuts no ice.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 01:10 PM
  #105  
warrenm2's Avatar
warrenm2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
From: Epsom
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Will you vote for UKIP in the general election?
I'll be voting UKIP for as long as we are in the EU and have no other party who want to get us out. I shall be voting UKIP as long as they are a small Gvmt, libertarian party. I shall be voting UKIP for as long as they show common sense on immigration, HS2 and energy policies for example.

So yes, I'll be voting UKIP at every opportunity for the foreseeable future
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 01:22 PM
  #106  
Carnut's Avatar
Carnut
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
From: I'll check my gps
Default

+1
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 01:36 PM
  #107  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,787
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

+2.......my eldest son will too.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 01:40 PM
  #108  
paulr's Avatar
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
Default

Originally Posted by warrenm2
I'll be voting UKIP for as long as we are in the EU and have no other party who want to get us out. I shall be voting UKIP as long as they are a small Gvmt, libertarian party. I shall be voting UKIP for as long as they show common sense on immigration, HS2 and energy policies for example.

So yes, I'll be voting UKIP at every opportunity for the foreseeable future
I'd vote UKIP to stick two fingers up to everyone else. However, god forbid if any of thier policies got implemented.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 01:56 PM
  #109  
DYK's Avatar
DYK
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,824
Likes: 1
From: Scooby Planet
Default

Originally Posted by warrenm2
Been having sporadic internet access so only just seen this. The "talking about immigration is racist" is so 2010, things have moved on big time since then, especially with Labour apologising for messing it up. We do need immigration - of good quality people though. What we have at the moment is no sorting of wheat from chaff. And that is what UKIP propose. Hardly controversial. The issue of native people not working is a separate issue to do with benefits.

As for how things are cat b write off now, things can be turned round in two sessions of Gvmt, look at the turn around after the Labour disaster of the 70s, read up on New Zealand in the mid 80s, it is possible with the right ideas.

Finally, as for UKIP being composed of BNP'ers - that is so wrong its almost actionable. UKIP are the only party that ban ex-BNP members from joining, which is more than can be said for Labour. Suggesting otherwise is a flimsy, transparent and pathetic smear. What are you so afraid of?

I shall be voting UKIP and am proud of it, the other 3 parties have a track record of letting this country down, its time to change things for the better with UKIP. As Pete says, people will be surprised at the amount of votes they get at the European AND LOCAL elections next month

The way I see it,I'm sick of hearing con/lab and cleggy boy going on and on,they don't give a straight answer to a question,they try to skip around it,and they have had more than enough chances over the years,its not as if they done a brilliant job over recent years is it.
So,if you don't change the way you vote,then maybe nothing will ever change.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 02:13 PM
  #110  
Mungo's Avatar
Mungo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
From: West Byfleet, Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by legb4rsk
The biggest lie the other parties spin is that we will lose 3 million jobs the minute we leave the EU.

We can make our own rules on tax & trading benefits & still deal with EU partners on exactly the same terms we do now.


Large multi-national companies do not throw multi-million pound deals down the toilet just because we wont be in the EU.They will deal & make decisions based purely on a financial basis,the same as they would with any other country in the world.
No, but large multi-national (non-British) companies (Nissan, Honda, Siemens, etc.) would choose not to locate their manufacturing in Britain if Britain was not part of the EU.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 02:21 PM
  #111  
Mungo's Avatar
Mungo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
From: West Byfleet, Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by Mungo
Pete - yours is a common mis-conception: most of UKIP's voter-base isn't ex-Tory, it's ex-Labour. They're "white faced, grey haired, and blue collar". They're a generation of low skilled workers who feel dis-engaged from the current political class - Milliband, Cameron and Clegg have such similar backgrounds that they're indistinguishable. Farage offers them something different, at least until the current hoo-ha about his MEP expenses and German wife has blown up.
And if you really think Labour offers fairness, you need to look again. Chucking good money after bad isn't fair on anybody.
I hope you saw the front page article in yesterday's Times - repeating above message that UKIP's core are ex-Labour, as Miliband (and Blair before him I guess) have made the party too middle-class.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 05:57 PM
  #112  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,787
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

I see the Grauniad is today announcing that the three major parties are to launch a smear campaign aimed at branding UKIP racist


But they aren't worried?

And why don't they come out and debate the issues properly instead of going for a smear campaign?


Even (the odious) Jacquie smith has refused to support the campaign, reportedly saying, "Have we learned nothing from bigot-gate?"
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 10:34 PM
  #113  
boomer's Avatar
boomer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
Default

Originally Posted by Mungo
No, but large multi-national (non-British) companies (Nissan, Honda, Siemens, etc.) would choose not to locate their manufacturing in Britain if Britain was not part of the EU.
Please provide a link to this "confirmed position" of the above manufacturers.

For example, it seems strange that even though Nissan's UK plant is one of the most productive car plants in Europe, they would want to move out?

mb
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 10:51 PM
  #114  
ScoobyWon't's Avatar
ScoobyWon't
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
From: Pot Belly HQ
Default

There's speculation that Farage could stand in the Newark by-election now that Patrick Mercer has quit.

If he won the seat and became an MP, it would really kick the Tories where it hurts.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/poli...cer-quits.html
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2014 | 09:44 AM
  #115  
jonc's Avatar
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,647
Likes: 22
Default

The UK economy is slowly recovering with 5 consecutive periods of GDP growth and a 0.8% growth in this year's first quarter. Voting UKIP will be catastrophic for the UK economy; UKIP have no economic policy to speak of and if Labour got back in to power with Milliband/***** at the helm it'll definitely be game over. Vote UKIP at the European election by all means, I probably will do too just to shake up the political establishment. But come the 2015 General Election I'd want continued economic stability and growth for the UK and won't jepordise that just for the sake of a protest vote. I just don't think the economy is robust enough yet for a major political upheaval.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2014 | 09:50 AM
  #116  
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 2
From: Limbo
Default

Just don't vote for the Green mentalists!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2014 | 11:13 AM
  #117  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by ScoobyWon't
There's speculation that Farage could stand in the Newark by-election now that Patrick Mercer has quit.

If he won the seat and became an MP, it would really kick the Tories where it hurts.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/poli...cer-quits.html
I see he bottled it
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2014 | 11:34 AM
  #118  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I see he bottled it
Nowadays the media spend too much time making non-events into events for viewing/reading figures. Remember Crick (a complete tool), I believe, pestering UKIP regarding the fact there were no black people on one of their posters, suggesting this demonstrated they are racist in some way?
A completely ridiculous question, but one when posed publicly that requires an answer.

If you were in Farage's position would you have stood for the Newark seat?
And if not would that be because you 'bottled it'.

To me it looks like little to gain and much to lose. Certainly the case by the time the media had finished with it, had he lost.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2014 | 12:35 PM
  #119  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
Nowadays the media spend too much time making non-events into events for viewing/reading figures. Remember Crick (a complete tool), I believe, pestering UKIP regarding the fact there were no black people on one of their posters, suggesting this demonstrated they are racist in some way?
A completely ridiculous question, but one when posed publicly that requires an answer.

If you were in Farage's position would you have stood for the Newark seat?
And if not would that be because you 'bottled it'.

To me it looks like little to gain and much to lose. Certainly the case by the time the media had finished with it, had he lost.
UKIP's entire political strategy based around making 'non-events' into events, or at least grossly distorting the truth.

Too many people on here are affording UKIP the kind of 'pass' they'd never give to the other parties

Farage won't stand because he knows he'll lose - no more to it than that
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2014 | 12:49 PM
  #120  
c_maguire's Avatar
c_maguire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
UKIP's entire political strategy based around making 'non-events' into events, or at least grossly distorting the truth.

Too many people on here are affording UKIP the kind of 'pass' they'd never give to the other parties

Farage won't stand because he knows he'll lose - no more to it than that
A seat with a 16000 majority.
He'd have to be retarded to stand, so your comment is of no substance. Were we dealing with a marginal then the circumstances would be entirely different.
UKIP will probably put up a candidate but you sacrifice pawns, not the Queen, for a play like that.
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 AM.