Ever cheated on a missus? Why'd you do it....
03 October 2015, 11:01 PM
#92
good rule of thumb to remember, only cheat if it's worth getting caught for, a old mate once said have you ever seen a well fit bird with a ugly bloke and wondered wtf is she doing with him,
the answer is not he has loads of money or a big dick,
it's syc she knows he aint gonna get anything better so she can do what she likes go out etc, it also works the other way as well good looking bloke with a average bird, he knows he can watch footie drink etc go out with mates cos she will put up with it cos she aint gonna get anything better,
the answer is not he has loads of money or a big dick,
it's syc she knows he aint gonna get anything better so she can do what she likes go out etc, it also works the other way as well good looking bloke with a average bird, he knows he can watch footie drink etc go out with mates cos she will put up with it cos she aint gonna get anything better,
04 October 2015, 12:26 AM
#93
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good rule of thumb to remember, only cheat if it's worth getting caught for, a old mate once said have you ever seen a well fit bird with a ugly bloke and wondered wtf is she doing with him,
the answer is not he has loads of money or a big dick,
it's syc she knows he aint gonna get anything better so she can do what she likes go out etc, it also works the other way as well good looking bloke with a average bird, he knows he can watch footie drink etc go out with mates cos she will put up with it cos she aint gonna get anything better,
the answer is not he has loads of money or a big dick,
it's syc she knows he aint gonna get anything better so she can do what she likes go out etc, it also works the other way as well good looking bloke with a average bird, he knows he can watch footie drink etc go out with mates cos she will put up with it cos she aint gonna get anything better,
04 October 2015, 12:48 AM
#96
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Bouncing around Kent
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread has given me a right laugh.
Look, 'if' the OP is genuine I'd suggest you take a good, hard look in the morror mate. 39 years old and more ****ed up than Lindsay Lohan. Plus, venting all this on a Subaru forum makes no sense to me?
However, I'm pretty sure this is a wind-up.... Thanks for a laugh.
Look, 'if' the OP is genuine I'd suggest you take a good, hard look in the morror mate. 39 years old and more ****ed up than Lindsay Lohan. Plus, venting all this on a Subaru forum makes no sense to me?
However, I'm pretty sure this is a wind-up.... Thanks for a laugh.
04 October 2015, 02:26 AM
#98
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hants
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes to all of this. I see my behaviours and self esteem issues here
LOL @ the term 'dirty old milfs' for POF females who don't care about your wedding ring and 'heffers' term from Tinder females. Surely, the men that visit such sites can't essentially be Mr. Michael Angelo's works of art either, can they? TBH such men have simply got to be fugly heffers themselves and additionally, very disrespectful to their wives/gfs. Perhaps such unsightly men's cheating has to do with their rock bottom self esteem due to their own fvkking damn fugliness.
And you're suggesting to reap benefits upon the other half's low self esteem. I suppose one must have low self esteem with substantial amount of insecurity at first place to aim low for that reason.
And you're suggesting to reap benefits upon the other half's low self esteem. I suppose one must have low self esteem with substantial amount of insecurity at first place to aim low for that reason.
04 October 2015, 05:42 AM
#99
Well if you cheated you were obviously not with the right person as she didn't mean enough to you for you to be faithful.
Another point is, if you were able to cheat then that means you're probably a decent enough looking and reasonable prospect, lets face it much like blokes, women don't like ugly sweat blokes.
So my advice is play the field for a while and get it out of your system, nothing quite like fresh ***** to take your mind off things, who knows you might even meet someone you have enough respect for to be faithful and put your trust in.
I don't think it's a wind up btw, I think it's obviously an existing user and he's posted on the thread too.
Another point is, if you were able to cheat then that means you're probably a decent enough looking and reasonable prospect, lets face it much like blokes, women don't like ugly sweat blokes.
So my advice is play the field for a while and get it out of your system, nothing quite like fresh ***** to take your mind off things, who knows you might even meet someone you have enough respect for to be faithful and put your trust in.
I don't think it's a wind up btw, I think it's obviously an existing user and he's posted on the thread too.
04 October 2015, 10:31 AM
#100
Maybe women/females in general is not for you, have you thought why you keep pushing these women away, I bet if you asked Elton John, Graham Norton etc they would tell you they did the same thing before coming out, its called denial.
By the sounds of it, you hate women, and that means only one thing, so until you can be honest with yourself, and admit that maybe your a bit confused with your sexuality, probably best to stay single until you work out what you want for the best!!
Your not originally from Brighton by any chance???
By the sounds of it, you hate women, and that means only one thing, so until you can be honest with yourself, and admit that maybe your a bit confused with your sexuality, probably best to stay single until you work out what you want for the best!!
Your not originally from Brighton by any chance???
04 October 2015, 11:51 AM
#101
Scooby Regular
No time for cheaters to be honest. Not a good personality trait at all. I recently was involved with 3mates all playing a part in cheating, don't have any trust for any of them anymore as I thought it was just wrong.
04 October 2015, 12:59 PM
#102
Scooby Regular
As I say in my #68 in my response to Mark...............
It hasn't been a bad thread for the value of the topic, but as it was started by some false being, the value of the responses is null in connection with his query. ****-n'-bull story to get reaction and the insight into others' lives.
It hasn't been a bad thread for the value of the topic, but as it was started by some false being, the value of the responses is null in connection with his query. ****-n'-bull story to get reaction and the insight into others' lives.
04 October 2015, 03:17 PM
#114
04 October 2015, 05:29 PM
#116
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well if you cheated you were obviously not with the right person as she didn't mean enough to you for you to be faithful.
Another point is, if you were able to cheat then that means you're probably a decent enough looking and reasonable prospect, lets face it much like blokes, women don't like ugly sweat blokes.
So my advice is play the field for a while and get it out of your system, nothing quite like fresh ***** to take your mind off things, who knows you might even meet someone you have enough respect for to be faithful and put your trust in.
I don't think it's a wind up btw, I think it's obviously an existing user and he's posted on the thread too.
Another point is, if you were able to cheat then that means you're probably a decent enough looking and reasonable prospect, lets face it much like blokes, women don't like ugly sweat blokes.
So my advice is play the field for a while and get it out of your system, nothing quite like fresh ***** to take your mind off things, who knows you might even meet someone you have enough respect for to be faithful and put your trust in.
I don't think it's a wind up btw, I think it's obviously an existing user and he's posted on the thread too.
An existing user is posting under a new pseudonym is more of an issue to mistrust him tbh. What stops him to put up his agony on the board under his previous and regular pseudonym? That he doesn't want to be identified by his ex and his parents who hate him for what he has done? because to tell you the truth, I don't think anyone here gives monkeys whether anyone cheats on anyone out there. He puts up false age on his profile to hide his identity, but then blurts out his real age on the thread with massively obvious title that includes his act in his own question. Why doesn't he think that his identity security is compromised with that? Kin hell, man! He's having a right giraffe, and making us laugh at his own naïve attempt!
He keeps saying that it's all true, and even 100% true. That doesn't negate the fact that for him to hide behind a new persona to tell this story hardly makes him credulous. To be fair, he hasn't denied once that he himself is untrue. What he denies is that the contents that he's giving out are untrue. But as the contents are coming from the source (a being, in this case) that is untrue, I'm afraid the contents cannot be vouched for being true, either.
Even when the topic he started is a valid one, his case is an utter nonsense one. He's responsible for making it into a nonsense one.
04 October 2015, 05:37 PM
#117
Of course! I said before that it is someone who knows this place very well. He may have been banned, or remains an active poster under another name, but he's no newb for sure. He also gave away the game when he told me to hear him out on a pm. Generally, it's the Scoobynet communications culture that if a bull$h!tter offers some bull$h!t via a pm, the gullible receiver would feel valued for having pm-ed that info in confidence and fall for it. Well, hang on, bull$h!t is bull$h!t- irrespective of being given out on the board or in a pm.
An existing user is posting under a new pseudonym is more of an issue to mistrust him tbh. What stops him to put up his agony on the board under his previous and regular pseudonym? That he doesn't want to be identified by his ex and his parents who hate him for what he has done? because to tell you the truth, I don't think anyone here gives monkeys whether anyone cheats on anyone out there. He puts up false age on his profile to hide his identity, but then blurts out his real age on the thread with massively obvious title that includes his act in his own question. Why doesn't he think that his identity security is compromised with that? Kin hell, man! He's having a right giraffe, and making us laugh at his own naïve attempt!
He keeps saying that it's all true, and even 100% true. That doesn't negate the fact that for him to hide behind a new persona to tell this story hardly makes him credulous. To be fair, he hasn't denied once that he himself is untrue. What he denies is that the contents that he's giving out are untrue. But as the contents are coming from the source (a being, in this case) that is untrue, I'm afraid the contents cannot be vouched for being true, either.
Even when the topic he started is a valid one, his case is an utter nonsense one. He's responsible for making it into a nonsense one.
An existing user is posting under a new pseudonym is more of an issue to mistrust him tbh. What stops him to put up his agony on the board under his previous and regular pseudonym? That he doesn't want to be identified by his ex and his parents who hate him for what he has done? because to tell you the truth, I don't think anyone here gives monkeys whether anyone cheats on anyone out there. He puts up false age on his profile to hide his identity, but then blurts out his real age on the thread with massively obvious title that includes his act in his own question. Why doesn't he think that his identity security is compromised with that? Kin hell, man! He's having a right giraffe, and making us laugh at his own naïve attempt!
He keeps saying that it's all true, and even 100% true. That doesn't negate the fact that for him to hide behind a new persona to tell this story hardly makes him credulous. To be fair, he hasn't denied once that he himself is untrue. What he denies is that the contents that he's giving out are untrue. But as the contents are coming from the source (a being, in this case) that is untrue, I'm afraid the contents cannot be vouched for being true, either.
Even when the topic he started is a valid one, his case is an utter nonsense one. He's responsible for making it into a nonsense one.
04 October 2015, 05:52 PM
#118
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts