|
View Full Version : blackjax vs cat1 immobiliser. SlowBoy 09 May 2003, 22:33 Aren't immobilisers cat 2? I thought alarms were cat 1. In answer to part of your question, most insurers require cat 1 security device, but there are some that don't. Look in Insurance for more details on this. [Edited by SlowBoy - 9/5/2003 10:35:13 PM] dead_neurons 03 September 2003, 21:37 is the blackjax classed as a full cat 1 immobiliser or just an anti-hijack device? do you need a full cat1 immobiliser anyway to satisfy the insurance co's? cheers! /2ob Maximum_Impact 03 September 2003, 23:03 the blackjax is an anti hijack device only. there are no provisions at the moment for thatcham approval of delayed immobilisation devices. if insurance company are requiring cat1 then you need an approved system. have a look at the C500 or the C600 at www.clifford.co.uk martin dead_neurons 04 September 2003, 00:30 thanks, will do. im leaning towards Cat1 immob + Barrier Deadlock + Disklok. i may add in the blackjax if i still have enough cash this month... cheers! /2ob KINGY71 04 September 2003, 19:16 Hello Max Impact glad to see you got round to scoobynet...you fitted my Blackjax last month....cheers WRX UK300... Maximum_Impact 04 September 2003, 19:46 everything ok with it? Martin KINGY71 05 September 2003, 18:04 Every-things fine how's it going since you took over?..... chiark 05 September 2003, 19:34 Martin, glad to see you've found the site :D Cheers, Nick. |