Opinions, Uniroyal Rainsport 3
#1
Opinions, Uniroyal Rainsport 3
Hi all, I have been shopping around for a new set of rubber and I have been considering Uniroyal's. I normally go for falkens but I am still not sure about the latest FK453 tyres and I have found the Uniroyal's at Camskills for less than £227 delivered so even with fitting added they are still cheaper than a full set of Falkens which would set me back about £300 fitted.
So am I making the right decision with the rainsport tyres or should I stick with the Falcons?
Cheers,
Ian
So am I making the right decision with the rainsport tyres or should I stick with the Falcons?
Cheers,
Ian
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
I would recommend you have a look at Momo M3's, I have had Falken 452 and Uniroyal Rainsports, Falkens are a reasonable budget tyre and the rainsports are a decent all year tyre but wear quite quickly, neither come close to the grip that is available from the Momo M3 in the dry and I would say they are better than the Falkens in the wet and probably the rainsports too, but it's a long time since I had them, so can't quite remember.
Momo M3 are a performance tyre for budget money.
Momo M3 are a performance tyre for budget money.
#6
Just got 4 of these to replace my falkens on my 05 Wrx and the uniroyal rainsport 3s are a lot softer/rides better...grip very good too .
Last edited by Andycat; 17 January 2016 at 04:32 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
They are very soft sidewalls, I personally wouldn't use them as not s decent all round tyres imo but i just wanted to state they are good in surface water type weather.
Heavy cars would be of concern to me, definitely wouldn't fit to my audi.
I go for original spec on audi (dunlop sportmaxx gt)
Heavy cars would be of concern to me, definitely wouldn't fit to my audi.
I go for original spec on audi (dunlop sportmaxx gt)
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
Not cheap but branded tyres come with quality on the rd, michellien, continental etc are good aswell and some better but i find the dunlop have a longer life span and quieter and decent in wet n dry.
I have also found, used branded tyres will last longer than brand new budget tyres due to rubber quality
I have also found, used branded tyres will last longer than brand new budget tyres due to rubber quality
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
The Momo M3's are a good tyre, even exceptional for the money, best I've had and at something like £50 a corner (I bought mine in Croatia so not sure what they cost in uk) they're a bargain.
I can only think they're so cheap because it's a new product for Momo, but I doubt they'd risk their good name on crap tyres, their stuff is generally good quality and they are a pretty big company, which is why I took a punt on their tyres and it paid off.
I can only think they're so cheap because it's a new product for Momo, but I doubt they'd risk their good name on crap tyres, their stuff is generally good quality and they are a pretty big company, which is why I took a punt on their tyres and it paid off.
#14
Thanks all for the info, I had my concerns over soft tyre walls but the car doesn't get driven hard these days so as long as they have good grip in all conditions then they could be worth while.
I have owned the car for 10 years and only had the original Bridgestones and the falken 452's and 453's so i have little else to compare to. I didn't find the Bridgestones that good to be honest so paying big bucks for tyres doesn't equal good grip.
I have never heard of Momo tyres ao will take a look at those but so far it seems the RS3 tyres are a reasonably good buy.
More direct comparisons between the falkens and RS3 would be good if anyone has any?
Cheers all
I have owned the car for 10 years and only had the original Bridgestones and the falken 452's and 453's so i have little else to compare to. I didn't find the Bridgestones that good to be honest so paying big bucks for tyres doesn't equal good grip.
I have never heard of Momo tyres ao will take a look at those but so far it seems the RS3 tyres are a reasonably good buy.
More direct comparisons between the falkens and RS3 would be good if anyone has any?
Cheers all
#18
I put 4 RS3's on my blob a couple months ago (225/45/17) they are excellent for this time of year offering amazing wet grip. The sidewalls are soft and the roll/wobblyness in corners is noticeable. However saying that you wont get the wet grip these tyres offer you with many other brands. The fastest wet lap round knockhill with a road car was with these tyres.
I can still spin two inside wheels in first gear off the throttle with them in the wet, but then 340 ftlb of torque tends to do that.
As a side note I run them at 34 psi to help with tyre wear, no noticeable wear with 2000 miles so far.
I can still spin two inside wheels in first gear off the throttle with them in the wet, but then 340 ftlb of torque tends to do that.
As a side note I run them at 34 psi to help with tyre wear, no noticeable wear with 2000 miles so far.
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
i have rainsport 3's on my STI and I can't wait to get them used up so I can switch to something else. Grip is good but the sidewalls are so so soft I'm considering upping the pressure to see if that helps them.
I can literally feel the car squishing down on them leaning into corners, sure there is grip but for me it has wiped out a lot of the confidence I had in the car on the previous set of bridgestones.
I'm putting most of my problems down to switching back to a 17" wheel as well, I was looking for something I could run over the winter and for that I guess they are OK. I think on a larger wheel with a smaller sidewall it probably wouldn't be so bad.
it's the XL ones I have as well, I think i'd be terrified with the regular ones on!
I can literally feel the car squishing down on them leaning into corners, sure there is grip but for me it has wiped out a lot of the confidence I had in the car on the previous set of bridgestones.
I'm putting most of my problems down to switching back to a 17" wheel as well, I was looking for something I could run over the winter and for that I guess they are OK. I think on a larger wheel with a smaller sidewall it probably wouldn't be so bad.
it's the XL ones I have as well, I think i'd be terrified with the regular ones on!
#21
i have rainsport 3's on my STI and I can't wait to get them used up so I can switch to something else. Grip is good but the sidewalls are so so soft I'm considering upping the pressure to see if that helps them.
I can literally feel the car squishing down on them leaning into corners, sure there is grip but for me it has wiped out a lot of the confidence I had in the car on the previous set of bridgestones.
I'm putting most of my problems down to switching back to a 17" wheel as well, I was looking for something I could run over the winter and for that I guess they are OK. I think on a larger wheel with a smaller sidewall it probably wouldn't be so bad.
it's the XL ones I have as well, I think i'd be terrified with the regular ones on!
I can literally feel the car squishing down on them leaning into corners, sure there is grip but for me it has wiped out a lot of the confidence I had in the car on the previous set of bridgestones.
I'm putting most of my problems down to switching back to a 17" wheel as well, I was looking for something I could run over the winter and for that I guess they are OK. I think on a larger wheel with a smaller sidewall it probably wouldn't be so bad.
it's the XL ones I have as well, I think i'd be terrified with the regular ones on!
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
36 in the front and 34 at the back - honestly it's like they are filled with mushrooms sometimes! As I said, i think its because i went from 18's down to 17's as well.
There's grip there, don't get me wrong - you hit a puddle and it aint no thing like a chicken wing, it's just when you have to lean on them a little you can feel a little something funny then it goes back to normal.
What pressure you running on yours?
There's grip there, don't get me wrong - you hit a puddle and it aint no thing like a chicken wing, it's just when you have to lean on them a little you can feel a little something funny then it goes back to normal.
What pressure you running on yours?
#23
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
36 in the front and 34 at the back - honestly it's like they are filled with mushrooms sometimes! As I said, i think its because i went from 18's down to 17's as well.
There's grip there, don't get me wrong - you hit a puddle and it aint no thing like a chicken wing, it's just when you have to lean on them a little you can feel a little something funny then it goes back to normal.
What pressure you running on yours?
There's grip there, don't get me wrong - you hit a puddle and it aint no thing like a chicken wing, it's just when you have to lean on them a little you can feel a little something funny then it goes back to normal.
What pressure you running on yours?
#25
36 in the front and 34 at the back - honestly it's like they are filled with mushrooms sometimes! As I said, i think its because i went from 18's down to 17's as well.
There's grip there, don't get me wrong - you hit a puddle and it aint no thing like a chicken wing, it's just when you have to lean on them a little you can feel a little something funny then it goes back to normal.
What pressure you running on yours?
There's grip there, don't get me wrong - you hit a puddle and it aint no thing like a chicken wing, it's just when you have to lean on them a little you can feel a little something funny then it goes back to normal.
What pressure you running on yours?
Are these not decent tyres? What do you class as decent tyres for the road in winter?
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
my statement was meant as a all round/year tyre. Especially on a performance car where the driver needs progression in all weathers.
I didn't say anything about winter tyres. Read my post.
There's loads of decent tyres out there for all year, Dunlop, mitchellen, continental etc etc. Depends what you want to use it for.
Most nowadays like to buy the cheapest tyres and expect to preform in all sinerios, you can't have all.
I'm pretty sure you didn't buy them tyres just for winter?
Like I said, they are good in wet and that's it, compared to others out there.
Last edited by bustaMOVEs; 19 January 2016 at 04:16 PM.
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
i got them just for these wet and wintery months, I knew they wouldn't be awesome in the dry - I think with smaller sidewalls on a larger rim they would probably be fine. The grip is there if you keep the sensible head on so from that point of view they do the job for me.
The 18's will be going back on though once things clear up a bit and I'll probably stick with those and pay the extra for a larger size next time.
The 18's will be going back on though once things clear up a bit and I'll probably stick with those and pay the extra for a larger size next time.
#28
I am a little torn now after reading the 2 sides of the story. I only cover around 4k a year so the tyres could be on there around 2 years so they will need to have reasonable ability all year around but the benefit of the extra wet grip is a big plus for me.
Like I said, I currently run Falkens, FK452 on the back and FK453 on the front. I am not a fan of mixing treads but the backs had plenty of life in them and the FK452's were no longer being produced. I have had maybe 3 sets of the FK452's and found them to be great all round tyres and better than the original Bridgestones but I am unsure about the FK453's so was considering the RS3's.
To tell the truth I would love to go for expensive rubber but I am currently not in a position to go big budget and the car doesn't get used in such a way to justify the extra cost either.
I guess what I really need to know is how do the RS3's compare to the FK452's, if they are in the same ball park with more wet grip then they could be worth while but if not then I will need to look at something else.
Decisions decisions........
Like I said, I currently run Falkens, FK452 on the back and FK453 on the front. I am not a fan of mixing treads but the backs had plenty of life in them and the FK452's were no longer being produced. I have had maybe 3 sets of the FK452's and found them to be great all round tyres and better than the original Bridgestones but I am unsure about the FK453's so was considering the RS3's.
To tell the truth I would love to go for expensive rubber but I am currently not in a position to go big budget and the car doesn't get used in such a way to justify the extra cost either.
I guess what I really need to know is how do the RS3's compare to the FK452's, if they are in the same ball park with more wet grip then they could be worth while but if not then I will need to look at something else.
Decisions decisions........