wr1 0-100 time
#1
wr1 0-100 time
this question may have been asked before but here goes how come a std wr1 can hit 100 in 10.6 secs,and it takes a 2.5sti uk ppp 12.2 secs, that is a big difference for 2 cars with virtually same bhp.
#4
I know that in 2004 Prodrive used to claim a time of 10.6 secs for 0-100 but there is no way that a 1470 Kg 4WD car with just 218 bhp per ton will do it in much under 12.8 seconds. That's the reality.
#7
I think the slightly quicker 0-60 time is due to gear ratios. The 6 speed box will not quite do 60 mph in second gear where as i believe the older 5 speed box will. I think 0-100 in 10.67 is a tad ambitious.
Trending Topics
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was doing by that chap at Pro-Drive via a 6k rpm launch from what I remember. 4.3secs 0-62 i think it was. In reality you wont be launching it everywhere so a sub 5 secs 0-62 will be very difficult on the road.
#20
I had a play with a WR1 in my Rb320. I was carrying more weight (passenger). first, second third we were pretty level although once i was in third i was edging in front. Once i hit forth i was gaining distance on him. Both cars were similar bhp and close to standard. Rb320 standard was listed at 12.2 0-100 and there was no way the WR1 was quicker. I put it down to my 2.5 have more torque and the closer ratio gear box in the mid range.
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Here are some figures, Type 25, Spec C, WR1 and P1 as tested by Evo magazine (care of litchfields Imports )
http://www.litimports.co.uk/images/p...e/evopage8.jpg
Tony
http://www.litimports.co.uk/images/p...e/evopage8.jpg
Tony
Last edited by TonyBurns; 21 July 2012 at 11:59 PM.
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a play with a WR1 in my Rb320. I was carrying more weight (passenger). first, second third we were pretty level although once i was in third i was edging in front. Once i hit forth i was gaining distance on him. Both cars were similar bhp and close to standard. Rb320 standard was listed at 12.2 0-100 and there was no way the WR1 was quicker. I put it down to my 2.5 have more torque and the closer ratio gear box in the mid range.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are some figures, Type 25, Spec C, WR1 and P1 as tested by Evo magazine (care of litchfields Imports )
http://www.litimports.co.uk/images/p...e/evopage8.jpg
Tony
http://www.litimports.co.uk/images/p...e/evopage8.jpg
Tony
Type 25.. mmm very nice.
#27
when the wr1 first appeared people bought it purely for the performance stats, in my opinion, and when a company like prodrive says the wr1 is the fastest impreza ever most people are gonna believe em. if ye not into modifying and your new to imprezas your gonna buy one, because of the figures they quoted.
#29
In 1980, the top racing mag of the time tested the then new Escort XR3 0-60 at 8.6 secs. Nobody else could get within a second of that time but the car sold like hot cakes on the strength of that one road test.