Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

wr1 0-100 time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 July 2012, 11:02 PM
  #1  
daz haigh
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
daz haigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default wr1 0-100 time

this question may have been asked before but here goes how come a std wr1 can hit 100 in 10.6 secs,and it takes a 2.5sti uk ppp 12.2 secs, that is a big difference for 2 cars with virtually same bhp.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:18 PM
  #2  
paulbu
Scooby Regular
 
paulbu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A standard 316 bhp WR1 does 0-100 in around 12.8 secs. It would need another 60 bhp to do the same increment in 10.6 secs.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:29 PM
  #3  
daz haigh
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
daz haigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

correct me if am wrong but the figure ive seen says 0-100 10.67secs and 4.25 secs 0-60
Old 21 July 2012, 11:31 PM
  #4  
paulbu
Scooby Regular
 
paulbu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know that in 2004 Prodrive used to claim a time of 10.6 secs for 0-100 but there is no way that a 1470 Kg 4WD car with just 218 bhp per ton will do it in much under 12.8 seconds. That's the reality.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:31 PM
  #5  
Busterbulldog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Busterbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In my garage
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i read that b4 i bought one new,the p1 was booked slower but it ate the wr1...personally i think the 6 speed slowed it right up
Old 21 July 2012, 11:32 PM
  #6  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its the driver, everyone knows wr1 drivers have lightening quick reactions to change gear and launch their cars lol
Old 21 July 2012, 11:33 PM
  #7  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daz haigh
correct me if am wrong but the figure ive seen says 0-100 10.67secs and 4.25 secs 0-60
I think the slightly quicker 0-60 time is due to gear ratios. The 6 speed box will not quite do 60 mph in second gear where as i believe the older 5 speed box will. I think 0-100 in 10.67 is a tad ambitious.

Trending Topics

Old 21 July 2012, 11:33 PM
  #8  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daz haigh
correct me if am wrong but the figure ive seen says 0-100 10.67secs and 4.25 secs 0-60
Dont believe everything you read mate, take it you've got this months Total Impreza as those figures are quoted there.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:34 PM
  #9  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WR1 has a 6 speed box Chopperman...
Old 21 July 2012, 11:35 PM
  #10  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Megaman
WR1 has a 6 speed box Chopperman...
Oh, then disregard my reckoning then
Old 21 July 2012, 11:36 PM
  #11  
Busterbulldog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Busterbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In my garage
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 5 speed boxes were better ,more suited to the power delivery
Old 21 July 2012, 11:38 PM
  #12  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
Oh, then disregard my reckoning then

Whats a normal STI rev to?
Think my std wr1 went to 7300rpm - maybe extra rpm helped.

Still yet to see a wr1 do book figures on a drag race like TOTB
Old 21 July 2012, 11:39 PM
  #13  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Busterbulldog
the 5 speed boxes were better ,more suited to the power delivery
Gearbox people will tell you the 5 speed is a weaker gearbox to the 6 speed for some reason too
Old 21 July 2012, 11:40 PM
  #14  
Busterbulldog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Busterbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In my garage
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

theres no way a wr1 will do the book 0-60 ...it was lies
Old 21 July 2012, 11:42 PM
  #15  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was doing by that chap at Pro-Drive via a 6k rpm launch from what I remember. 4.3secs 0-62 i think it was. In reality you wont be launching it everywhere so a sub 5 secs 0-62 will be very difficult on the road.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:44 PM
  #16  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Megaman
Gearbox people will tell you the 5 speed is a weaker gearbox to the 6 speed for some reason too
Is it not then ?
Old 21 July 2012, 11:45 PM
  #17  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Book 0-60 times are a joke in reality.
They are done in absolutely perfect conditions with zero mechanical sympathy.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:46 PM
  #18  
Busterbulldog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Busterbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In my garage
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it wasnt as quick as the p1 in any situation,but it was less battering over the bumps,the brakes were better but wear out fast and service intervals were 5000 miles
Old 21 July 2012, 11:46 PM
  #19  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Megaman
Gearbox people will tell you the 5 speed is a weaker gearbox to the 6 speed for some reason too
Probably because it is
Old 21 July 2012, 11:48 PM
  #20  
chopperman
Scooby Regular
 
chopperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Megaman

Whats a normal STI rev to?
Think my std wr1 went to 7300rpm - maybe extra rpm helped.

Still yet to see a wr1 do book figures on a drag race like TOTB
I had a play with a WR1 in my Rb320. I was carrying more weight (passenger). first, second third we were pretty level although once i was in third i was edging in front. Once i hit forth i was gaining distance on him. Both cars were similar bhp and close to standard. Rb320 standard was listed at 12.2 0-100 and there was no way the WR1 was quicker. I put it down to my 2.5 have more torque and the closer ratio gear box in the mid range.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:50 PM
  #21  
Busterbulldog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Busterbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In my garage
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i did 100,000 miles in 3 ..5 speeders without any gearbox issues...most prob down to too many miss timed on boost gearchanges...weve all done it...havnt we??? :@(
Old 21 July 2012, 11:55 PM
  #22  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Here are some figures, Type 25, Spec C, WR1 and P1 as tested by Evo magazine (care of litchfields Imports )
http://www.litimports.co.uk/images/p...e/evopage8.jpg

Tony

Last edited by TonyBurns; 21 July 2012 at 11:59 PM.
Old 21 July 2012, 11:56 PM
  #23  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Busterbulldog
it wasnt as quick as the p1 in any situation,but it was less battering over the bumps,the brakes were better but wear out fast and service intervals were 5000 miles
The P1 I have been in felt a lot lighter than the wr1 but power wise didnt feel that much slower than a WR1. 22b has to be the daddy really
Old 21 July 2012, 11:58 PM
  #24  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chopperman
I had a play with a WR1 in my Rb320. I was carrying more weight (passenger). first, second third we were pretty level although once i was in third i was edging in front. Once i hit forth i was gaining distance on him. Both cars were similar bhp and close to standard. Rb320 standard was listed at 12.2 0-100 and there was no way the WR1 was quicker. I put it down to my 2.5 have more torque and the closer ratio gear box in the mid range.
Yer I drive an RB320 quite a lot as the father in law has one - definitely a lot torquier than my WR1 when it used to be standard. On a track or on the road in reality there isnt much in it. I could creep away from him in some scenarios and vice versa.
Old 22 July 2012, 12:00 AM
  #25  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Here are some figures, Type 25, Spec C, WR1 and P1 as tested by Evo magazine (care of litchfields Imports )
http://www.litimports.co.uk/images/p...e/evopage8.jpg

Tony
Good find

Type 25.. mmm very nice.
Old 22 July 2012, 12:02 AM
  #26  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Megaman
Good find

Type 25.. mmm very nice.
Just change the page number, think it goes to 10
Old 22 July 2012, 12:17 AM
  #27  
daz haigh
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
daz haigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when the wr1 first appeared people bought it purely for the performance stats, in my opinion, and when a company like prodrive says the wr1 is the fastest impreza ever most people are gonna believe em. if ye not into modifying and your new to imprezas your gonna buy one, because of the figures they quoted.
Old 22 July 2012, 12:19 AM
  #28  
Busterbulldog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Busterbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In my garage
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

t was a handsome car,tho back in the day the type R was always regarded as the best of the bunch...another 5 speeder
Old 22 July 2012, 12:24 AM
  #29  
paulbu
Scooby Regular
 
paulbu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In 1980, the top racing mag of the time tested the then new Escort XR3 0-60 at 8.6 secs. Nobody else could get within a second of that time but the car sold like hot cakes on the strength of that one road test.
Old 22 July 2012, 12:27 AM
  #30  
Busterbulldog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Busterbulldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: In my garage
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

petter solberg was doing well at the time too


Quick Reply: wr1 0-100 time



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 AM.