2.0 or 2.5 for mods?
#1
2.0 or 2.5 for mods?
Hello all,
Im in the process of buying a Blobeye or later STI. Whats the opinion, possibly from people who have owned both, of the 2.5 over the 2.0?
I originally wanted to stick with a 2.0 but there are a few of the hawkeye 2.5 STIs available for me to take a look at.
Which option is best for performance upgrades reliability etc etc.
Cheers
Andy
Im in the process of buying a Blobeye or later STI. Whats the opinion, possibly from people who have owned both, of the 2.5 over the 2.0?
I originally wanted to stick with a 2.0 but there are a few of the hawkeye 2.5 STIs available for me to take a look at.
Which option is best for performance upgrades reliability etc etc.
Cheers
Andy
#2
Hawkeye is cheaper to get to around 400 bhp but anything beyond that it would be advisable to rebuild with at least forged pistons and possibly rods. 2.0 litres appear to be stronger but will struggle to get past 350 bhp without fitting a bigger turbo.
It also depends what you want from the car, a 2.0 litre likes to be revved whereas a 2.5 has lots more low down torque but doesn't rev as well as a 2.0.
It also depends what you want from the car, a 2.0 litre likes to be revved whereas a 2.5 has lots more low down torque but doesn't rev as well as a 2.0.
#3
Hawkeye is cheaper to get to around 400 bhp but anything beyond that it would be advisable to rebuild with at least forged pistons and possibly rods. 2.0 litres appear to be stronger but will struggle to get past 350 bhp without fitting a bigger turbo.
It also depends what you want from the car, a 2.0 litre likes to be revved whereas a 2.5 has lots more low down torque but doesn't rev as well as a 2.0.
It also depends what you want from the car, a 2.0 litre likes to be revved whereas a 2.5 has lots more low down torque but doesn't rev as well as a 2.0.
Only interested in going up to 330ish, so remap, decat etc, just the basics.
#5
Hawkeye is cheaper to get to around 400 bhp but anything beyond that it would be advisable to rebuild with at least forged pistons and possibly rods. 2.0 litres appear to be stronger but will struggle to get past 350 bhp without fitting a bigger turbo.
It also depends what you want from the car, a 2.0 litre likes to be revved whereas a 2.5 has lots more low down torque but doesn't rev as well as a 2.0.
It also depends what you want from the car, a 2.0 litre likes to be revved whereas a 2.5 has lots more low down torque but doesn't rev as well as a 2.0.
also a hawkeye looks the nuts
Trending Topics
#8
agreed that all those who say that a 2.5 dont rev have probably never owned/driven one, my sons revs like a ba***ard and makes 600 on v power alone and is a daliy driver,
how many 2.0 do you know that can say that,
2.5 all the way
how many 2.0 do you know that can say that,
2.5 all the way
#9
dont get me worng i have a built 2.0ltr in mine at the minute and its making very nice power indeed around the 500 mark and 430/440 lb but i can only imagine what torque it would make on a 2.5 running a gt35 / p20 at 1.9bar
although i would love a 2.2 / 2.35 it would be the best option as they are meant to make as much power as a 2.5 but be a little more revvy similar to a 2.0 but they are bloody expensive but so i have heard bullet proof where a 2.5 can be weaker above the 450/450 mark so i understand and need linering. Value for money would see me running a 2.5 as you can rev them
although i would love a 2.2 / 2.35 it would be the best option as they are meant to make as much power as a 2.5 but be a little more revvy similar to a 2.0 but they are bloody expensive but so i have heard bullet proof where a 2.5 can be weaker above the 450/450 mark so i understand and need linering. Value for money would see me running a 2.5 as you can rev them
#11
dont get me worng i have a built 2.0ltr in mine at the minute and its making very nice power indeed around the 500 mark and 430/440 lb but i can only imagine what torque it would make on a 2.5 running a gt35 / p20 at 1.9bar
although i would love a 2.2 / 2.35 it would be the best option as they are meant to make as much power as a 2.5 but be a little more revvy similar to a 2.0 but they are bloody expensive but so i have heard bullet proof where a 2.5 can be weaker above the 450/450 mark so i understand and need linering. Value for money would see me running a 2.5 as you can rev them
although i would love a 2.2 / 2.35 it would be the best option as they are meant to make as much power as a 2.5 but be a little more revvy similar to a 2.0 but they are bloody expensive but so i have heard bullet proof where a 2.5 can be weaker above the 450/450 mark so i understand and need linering. Value for money would see me running a 2.5 as you can rev them
Its recently been remapped and made 604 crankshaft, 544 whp and 525 ftlbs
its a 2.5 with liners and its still open deck,
liners are not a mystery and if you need them its not a big deal,
Heres an old saying for you all
"theres no subsitute for cubic inches"
Last edited by Badbird; 19 February 2010 at 03:53 PM.
#13
our 2.5 was origionaly mapped at 570 hp and run round the streets and a few blasts at santa pod,
Its recently been remapped and made 604 crankshaft, 544 whp and 525 ftlbs
its a 2.5 with liners and its still open deck,
liners are not a mystery and if you need them its not a big deal,
Heres an old saying for you all
"theres no subsitute for cubic inches"
Its recently been remapped and made 604 crankshaft, 544 whp and 525 ftlbs
its a 2.5 with liners and its still open deck,
liners are not a mystery and if you need them its not a big deal,
Heres an old saying for you all
"theres no subsitute for cubic inches"
#19
the turbo is a gt35r yes the torque is a bit low but it was sacrificed for top end, but this was on straight v power no additives or alcohol,
the open deck block is fine with the thick wall top hat liners in the block,
this engine has a couple of thousand street miles on it and been up the track,
not 1 problem at all ever,
Paul built it ,tuned it and did the dyno work,
but back to the topic a factory 2.5 car will give you a head start unless you are going wild with it IMHO
Last edited by Badbird; 19 February 2010 at 09:48 PM.
#20
Based upon there being no overwhelming reason to go for one over the other, I will probably be going for a 2.5 with Ecutek, filter and exhaust that I have seen advertised.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM