Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

UK spec more reliable??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #1  
jaidenthomas's Avatar
jaidenthomas
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Gt Yarmouth
Default UK spec more reliable??

In general would you guys say that a UK spec classic would be more reliable than a JDM? I know it has alot to do with service history and tlc but how reliable would one be against a well looked after like for like sti. I have found that whilst searching for my perfect scoob I have come across UKDM doing well over 100k while there seems to be no end of JDM with engine rebuilds after 60-70k. Begining to think that its going to be worth sacrificing the extra power for that reliability.
Cheers guys

Last edited by jaidenthomas; Dec 21, 2008 at 10:15 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #2  
James Neill's Avatar
James Neill
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Default

If you're talking about the classics then yes - all things being equal - IMHO the UK models are more reliable.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,231
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

.......probably due to the fuel that JDM's are mapped for. If the same fuel was available from uk pumps then i would think that there would be far fewer rebuilds
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #4  
jaidenthomas's Avatar
jaidenthomas
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Gt Yarmouth
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
.......probably due to the fuel that JDM's are mapped for. If the same fuel was available from uk pumps then i would think that there would be far fewer rebuilds
What about if they r run on V power with an octane boost from import?
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #5  
James Neill's Avatar
James Neill
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Default

Put simply the JDMs push the engines harder than the UK spec. They have uprated items but the tollerance is less IMO. A UK classic with 215bhp is just less hard on the engine than a 300bhp JDM (STi anyway)
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #6  
dj219957's Avatar
dj219957
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 1
From: Staffs
Default

jdm cars run a bit more agresive stock ecu which needs min 98 ron fuel. too many people run 95 ron fuel in these cars which results in det and a rebuild.
plus of course a more agresive map puts a bit more strain on the engine.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #7  
BULLITT's Avatar
BULLITT
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 0
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by dj219957
jdm cars run a bit more agresive stock ecu which needs min 98 ron fuel. too many people run 95 ron fuel in these cars which results in det and a rebuild.
plus of course a more agresive map puts a bit more strain on the engine.
So its mainly a case of people not using the correct fuel ie. not knowing what the car they're driving, rather than a reliability issue.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #8  
dazdavies's Avatar
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,066
Likes: 85
From: N/A
Default

An STI mapped for UK fuel is no more or no less reliable than a UK classic.
The only differences mechanically in the engine are pistons and valve train. Everything else is just about identical and they are all assembled in the same factory.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #9  
stealthy55's Avatar
stealthy55
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
An STI mapped for UK fuel is no more or no less reliable than a UK classic.
The only differences mechanically in the engine are pistons and valve train. Everything else is just about identical and they are all assembled in the same factory.
is this the same for the newage?
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #10  
jaidenthomas's Avatar
jaidenthomas
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Gt Yarmouth
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
An STI mapped for UK fuel is no more or no less reliable than a UK classic.
The only differences mechanically in the engine are pistons and valve train. Everything else is just about identical and they are all assembled in the same factory.
And is this remap is easily done by a tuning company??
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #11  
G-string's Avatar
G-string
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
From: South Wales
Smile

To be honest its as said above really people putting 95 ron fuel in imports, but if you get a decent early classic imported from Japan then its never run on our fuel and are generally in top condition (due to their MOT laws), then Ive found them very reliable. Ive had 3 imports, all early classics and in 5 years total driving of them, bearing in mind the average age of them about 10or 11 years, Ive only replaced 1 MAF sensor and 1 wheel bearing. Considering they are very high performance cars I think thats very gvood going, but when you buy do it with your eyes wide open and check everything twice.
Though Ive also had 2 uk classic turbos and had to replace a clutch on one, ok wear and tear, and a gearbox on another after 65000 miles under warrenty though. Its like all cars check everything, and if anything is wrong walk away there are plenty more out there.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
crazyspeedfreakz
Wanted
17
Oct 5, 2015 07:19 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
the shreksta
Other Marques
26
Oct 1, 2015 02:30 PM
yabbadoo4
ScoobyNet General
11
Sep 30, 2015 10:33 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 AM.