Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

FQ 340 or Type-R?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default FQ 340 or Type-R?

My mate has jus picked his FQ340 up today,
Im just wondering which would be quicker, his or my 310BHP Type-R?

Mine is alot lighter than his, which should make it quite close which ever way it went.
I read on Google that his is 1400kgs...

What do you lot think?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #2  
mickp's Avatar
mickp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: North West
Default

We are all biased on here

So i reckon Type R
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #3  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

They normally push out (the fq340) a bit more power than stated, plus its got better power delivery and more torque, it will be close but the FQ340 should be the quicker drivers car.

Tony
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #4  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default

I found this.....
Mitsubishi Evo MR 340 | Long Term Tests | Car Reviews | evo
It says it run the 1/4 mile in 12.9 i ran a 13 flat altho i neva launched it.

Could be a close 1, but i think you are right, the Evo will have the edge
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #5  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

People are getting into the 11s on the Evo with simple mods and good driving.

One in the US has done high 10s on the standard turbo and engine with no nitrous, but lots of other mods including alcohol injection and 32 PSI.

So mod for mod, the Evo makes considerably more power and over a wider rev range. However, weight does come into it, and a genuine 310 BHP Type R would give a standard FQ340 a hare time indeed.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #6  
jameswrx's Avatar
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 42
From: Kent
Default

I'd say one thing..

A 310bhp type r is going to be more fun to drive than a standard fq340
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #7  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

I would not agree jameswrx, I find an Evo just as much fun as an equivalent Scooby. The recent Evos and STIs seem to have converged in handling since 2005 - as the Evo has become more compliant, the STI has firmed up, has DCCD-A, stickier tyres even though of course it is quieter and heavier than the old GC8. I can see the appeal of the old GC8 cars, but I wouldn't say they are more fun as such. Some really do prefer the rawness of the older models though. For a road car, the fancy diffs on the newer STI and the GSR Evos result in some saying they do everything for you. I suppose that is true to an extent that a computerised diff with yaw sensors is balancing the chassis (and maximising the grip of all four tyres), so if you enjoy controlling grip at both ends of the car (depending on manual DCCD setting) at lower speeds then an old Type R on its original 205/50R16 tyres is for you, but if you are really into that then RWD on skinny tyres in the wet is surely more fun? Not my idea of fun personally, but a talkative and balanced chassis that can be fun below the sliding limit is my ideal for a road car. Subaru steering is absolutely dead in comparison to an Evo, so right away a lot of the appeal has gone for me.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #8  
GAG's Avatar
GAG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: LUTON.
Default

my 98' import sti is 300bhp and weighs 1200kg
ive had a few plays with evo fqs i think 300 0r 320? and we were both neck and neck i always experience more powerfull cars with fcukwitt incompetent drivers and they cant keep up , once you start getting to 300-350bhp cars its mainly driver skill i think mate. on a track one might be faster by a second but on the road ?????????????????????
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #9  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

If the FQ340 is pro-rata quicker than my sons IX FQ320 then it should be the EVO but not by an enormous amount.
Chris's un-modified 320 gave 347 on Power Engineerings rollers recently.
The EVO has greater pulling power from lower revs than my 340 bhp 03 STi and is more responsive to the throttle. If only I could read the speedo and tach. without my reading glasses, I'd say it was a very desirable motor!
JohnD
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #10  
terzo204's Avatar
terzo204
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Westfield, 335i and 197 Cup
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
If the FQ340 is pro-rata quicker than my sons IX FQ320 then it should be the EVO but not by an enormous amount.
Chris's un-modified 320 gave 347 on Power Engineerings rollers recently.
The EVO has greater pulling power from lower revs than my 340 bhp 03 STi and is more responsive to the throttle. If only I could read the speedo and tach. without my reading glasses, I'd say it was a very desirable motor!
JohnD
My G/Friend used to work for Miti and apparently all the FQ models produce more than 'it say's on the tin'

FQ 340 is years ahead in terms of technology so that's where my money is.

Sorry.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #11  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

I would of thought fq340 said it all against a 310bhp scoob
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 03:31 AM
  #12  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default

Hmm intresting view,
I went out in it tonight with him, we were 4 up in the car and it still felt torque'er than mine. altho it does have some turbo lag, which mine dosnt have.
I reckon when we race them down at the pod it will only b about a tenth of a second diffrence.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #13  
nickejmartin's Avatar
nickejmartin
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Default

I went up against an fq340 in my type r some while back on a straight dual carriageway away from a set of lights. Got comprehensive beaten I'm afraid. In fact so much so I would say the evo was far from standard. Also my clutch was knackered and I think if I did the same now it would be closer - but I ran a Evo8 330 for 3 years and they are very quick, but I would say my near standard type r is so close to be un noticeable - at least in every day terms.

However this run in did demonstrate how good the evos are and by the way he pulled in front, depressingly so.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #14  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default

I can settle this debate right here and right now
Had 2 races against him tonight, i let him go from infront as i thought his was quicker
Well thats not true! i was stuck on him bumper, i had to back off cause i was gaining on him ever so slightly, but still i was gaining
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:20 AM
  #15  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default

I forgot to mention, it was streight line racing too, not round bends or country lanes.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #16  
satancom's Avatar
satancom
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: Swansea (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Phildodd06
I forgot to mention, it was streight line racing too, not round bends or country lanes.
Try it the other way round so he is slipstreaming you.. see what happens
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #17  
GAG's Avatar
GAG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: LUTON.
Thumbs up

thats what i was explaining philldodd if the cars are 3-340bhp and with 2x good drivers i think it is neck n neck on road matey well done anyway stick with your type r
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #18  
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh (ish)
Default

Originally Posted by GAG
thats what i was explaining philldodd if the cars are 3-340bhp and with 2x good drivers i think it is neck n neck on road matey well done anyway stick with your type r

Did you run out of smileys ?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #19  
Gear Head's Avatar
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Default

FQ340, hands down.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #20  
lisescooby's Avatar
lisescooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: north yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
FQ340, hands down.
took the words out of my mouth
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #21  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default

Pod will sort it out
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 01:50 AM
  #22  
Fangoria's Avatar
Fangoria
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Default

John Banks :-)

Why did you opt for a 340 Evo and not the 360 Evo?

Curious as I'm thinking of purchasing an Evo as my next vehicle and cant decide which to get - I want a nearly new car......... not even going to consider the new Evo as they are just too heavy

I would decat, filter and remap and methonal mix - what could I expect to get with a 360 versus a 340?

(I currently own an sti5 (=bottomless money pit), Ecutek'd wrx04 and Brand new Forrester STI. (sti5 and wrx04 are now essentially track cars - I use the wrx04 when the sti5 is being repaired (i.e. new engine or brake discs - had to wait 7 weeks for last set of discs from AP!!)
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #23  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default

I dont have the FQ340, my mates does
He was gonna get the 320, but i said my type-r would kill it, so he got the 340
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 01:20 PM
  #24  
L33_WRX's Avatar
L33_WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Default

what mods have you got on your type-r? I would place my bet on the evo
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 02:47 PM
  #25  
Tone Loc's Avatar
Tone Loc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,166
Likes: 1
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
FQ340, hands down.
Agreed.... who cares if the type R is a bit quicker, the Evo is a much better car overall (and isn't 8-10 years old!)

Tony.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 02:57 PM
  #26  
RUDDY's Avatar
RUDDY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Worcstershire
Default

age is irelevent you tit!
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #27  
Mikkel's Avatar
Mikkel
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
From: North East
Default

Originally Posted by RUDDY
age is irelevent you tit!
Not on a road car it isn't.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #28  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

I was going to buy a new JDM import and do the induction/exhaust/pump/remap to approx 400 BHP thing (any Evo IX will do this). However, I found a 4000 mile 6 month old FQ340 in excellent condition with lots of extras at a good price. FQ360 wasn't out then, but the only important differences are a fuel pump, sports cat and remap.

Originally Posted by Fangoria
John Banks :-)

Why did you opt for a 340 Evo and not the 360 Evo?

Curious as I'm thinking of purchasing an Evo as my next vehicle and cant decide which to get - I want a nearly new car......... not even going to consider the new Evo as they are just too heavy

I would decat, filter and remap and methonal mix - what could I expect to get with a 360 versus a 340?

(I currently own an sti5 (=bottomless money pit), Ecutek'd wrx04 and Brand new Forrester STI. (sti5 and wrx04 are now essentially track cars - I use the wrx04 when the sti5 is being repaired (i.e. new engine or brake discs - had to wait 7 weeks for last set of discs from AP!!)
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #29  
Fangoria's Avatar
Fangoria
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Default

ok - so 360 isnt worth the premium if these are the only differences as I'd be remapping anyway and decatting and it costs very little to put an upgraded fuel pump in - though at that level of power maybe not required
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #30  
Phildodd06's Avatar
Phildodd06
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by L33_WRX
what mods have you got on your type-r? I would place my bet on the evo
Just the Exhaust.
3" from turbo back (Decated)
Oh and a Green cotton pannel filter too
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 AM.