I know I shouldn't do this but.....
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by New_scooby_04
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by andythejock01wrx
Know the driver ?


"Wasn't me"!!
The driver comes from a more northern part of the country than I, and more southern than you judging by that accent!
Posts as Rich Perry 84 on You Tube!
Ns04
Last edited by New_scooby_04; Oct 20, 2006 at 07:46 PM.
Trending Topics
This Video was on SN last week.
I'm sure I read a later post on here that, on a Ferrari Site, the Italian Car Driver was saying how he'd baited the Scoob & was only half trying & let it pass just to have a laugh at him??
Am I imagining it, or was this posted?
Alan MaC
I'm sure I read a later post on here that, on a Ferrari Site, the Italian Car Driver was saying how he'd baited the Scoob & was only half trying & let it pass just to have a laugh at him??
Am I imagining it, or was this posted?
Alan MaC
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by Alan MaC
This Video was on SN last week.
I'm sure I read a later post on here that, on a Ferrari Site, the Italian Car Driver was saying how he'd baited the Scoob & was only half trying & let it pass just to have a laugh at him??
Am I imagining it, or was this posted?
Alan MaC
I'm sure I read a later post on here that, on a Ferrari Site, the Italian Car Driver was saying how he'd baited the Scoob & was only half trying & let it pass just to have a laugh at him??
Am I imagining it, or was this posted?
Alan MaC
Check out the figures:
Ferrari 360
bhp per ton 0-60 0-100 60-100 quarter mile
280.2 4.27 9.44 5.17 12.47
Bhp per ton: 263.42
0 - 60 (Secs) : 3.950 - 100 (Secs) : 10.1660 - 100 (Secs) : 6.21Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.60
The video seems to support this, the Ferrari didn't have enough poke to pull away from the Scooby at the speeds attained, just enough to keep it at bay. No shame in that, Scoobies and Evos are designed to keep exotica honest!
IMHO it's clear that the Ferrari did let the scooby by at the end of the video, as the Scooby would not have enough power to pass it if the Fezza was trying and hadn't been caught sleeping.
Ns04
Last edited by New_scooby_04; Oct 21, 2006 at 01:14 AM.
Well ive had the pleasure of driving a 360 modena with the flappy paddle gearchange at bruntingthorpe training ground and have to say the acceleration was dissapointing...compared to my v5 sti ra..
Sounded sweet and certainly had plenty of grip in the corners though.
Sounded sweet and certainly had plenty of grip in the corners though.
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by Rannoch
Ferrari wasn't trying.
Next!
Next!
YET
When a scooby with a similar power to weight ratio and -no doubt- a higher torque to weight ratio than a Fezza gives it a hard time, it's, "he wasn't trying"
Accept it: the Ferrari WAS NOT sufficently quicker than the Scooby to put clean air between it!
Conceed now, or I'll start giving chinese burns!!!!
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by n one
I only watched 2 mins of it. It was crap. What`s the fuss about?

Neil.

Neil.
Ns04
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,945
Likes: 2
From: "Engineering Perfection in Essex"
Just for a comparisson.
heres a 360whp STI vs a Lambo Murcielago...
This is why suercars are supercars
Video - 360 whp STI Vs. Murcielago
heres a 360whp STI vs a Lambo Murcielago...
This is why suercars are supercars

Video - 360 whp STI Vs. Murcielago
Originally Posted by frayz
Just for a comparisson.
heres a 360whp STI vs a Lambo Murcielago...
This is why suercars are supercars
Video - 360 whp STI Vs. Murcielago
heres a 360whp STI vs a Lambo Murcielago...
This is why suercars are supercars

Video - 360 whp STI Vs. Murcielago
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by frayz
Just for a comparisson.
heres a 360whp STI vs a Lambo Murcielago...
This is why suercars are supercars
Video - 360 whp STI Vs. Murcielago
heres a 360whp STI vs a Lambo Murcielago...
This is why suercars are supercars

Video - 360 whp STI Vs. Murcielago
Car Stats - Four Wheel Drive
The Lambo would have the poke, the Ferrari didn't.

Always preferred lambos
Last edited by New_scooby_04; Oct 21, 2006 at 07:40 PM.
...the Autocar test of the 360 had a 0-100 time of 8s.
A Scood would either need a lot of power or a lot less weight to compete. A standard STi V does 0-100 in around 12.5s.
Also as a 360 will have reasonably linear power delivery it will feel less powerful or quick as a Scoob - until you look at the speedo. My 911 was exactly the same.
On track my 330bhp Sti V was bang on the same pace as a 355 in a straight line. But the 355 was a lot slower than the 360.
A Scood would either need a lot of power or a lot less weight to compete. A standard STi V does 0-100 in around 12.5s.
Also as a 360 will have reasonably linear power delivery it will feel less powerful or quick as a Scoob - until you look at the speedo. My 911 was exactly the same.
On track my 330bhp Sti V was bang on the same pace as a 355 in a straight line. But the 355 was a lot slower than the 360.
Last edited by Trout; Oct 21, 2006 at 07:51 PM.
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by Rannoch
...the Autocar test of the 360 had a 0-100 time of 8s.
.
.
The car in question was a 350bhp scooby, with probably similar torque. The figures for the Fezza and Scooby are above and they tell a story that seems to correspond with that video i.e. the Fezza would not be able to put much clean air between the two. A Fezza 430 would be a different matter though, as that has more power still and the torque that the F360 lacks.
BTW power to weight ratio of 355 289.87 bhp/ton
Power to weight ratio of 355 292.39 bhp/ton
The latter won't be that much quicker. If it was, someone wasnt trying

Ns04
Last edited by New_scooby_04; Oct 21, 2006 at 09:28 PM.
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by Sweepickit
I was just waiting for a tractor to pull out on a blind bend
Or worse still a group of cyclists to be around the next corner. Not the most sensible piece of driving I've ever seen. 
Or worse still a group of cyclists to be around the next corner. Not the most sensible piece of driving I've ever seen. 
Ns04
STi V passing Porsches
Sorry no Ferraris - lots of Porks and an M5 though and not a tractor in sight
Sorry no Ferraris - lots of Porks and an M5 though and not a tractor in sight
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Originally Posted by Rannoch
STi V passing Porsches
Sorry no Ferraris - lots of Porks and an M5 though and not a tractor in sight
Sorry no Ferraris - lots of Porks and an M5 though and not a tractor in sight

You?
Ns04
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,889
Likes: 0
From: Club Chairman - West Mids Imprezas
I once beat a Ferrari 360 in my mates scoob (yep it was modded)We pulled away clean and took him on the bends up to 150 . the guy was shocked but hey who cares a Ferrari is still a Ferrari and given the choice (and if we could afford one) Id have the ferrari over my mates scoob all day long.




