What's a fast but feasible 0-100 time for a modded new-age scoob?
Was chatting to a bloke at w**k about Subarus when he mentioned that his son had a new Subaru, but wasn't knowledgeable enough about model types to tell me what kind. All he could recall was that the colour was light (silver, or perhaps WR1 Ice Blue?) Had a big rear spoiler (that narrows it down
) it was modified and that his son claimed that it's 0-100 time was in the 9s. Does that seem feasible or reasonable?
) it was modified and that his son claimed that it's 0-100 time was in the 9s. Does that seem feasible or reasonable?
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,078
Likes: 310
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
I think the official 0-100 on a WR1 is a Little under 11seconds (10.7 or sommat) IIRC 
That's got me thinking now...I've never measured the 0-100 on my scoob

That's got me thinking now...I've never measured the 0-100 on my scoob
Thought not... Just did a quick search (don't normally bother, the search facility's a bit cack) and found that the WR1's about 12 ish seconds*. What sort of power would a Scoob need for that kind of performance?
*In real world times, not claimed ones...
*In real world times, not claimed ones...
Last edited by Bubba po; Jan 19, 2005 at 09:51 PM.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by ALi-B
I think the official 0-100 on a WR1 is a Little under 11seconds (10.7 or sommat) IIRC 
That's got me thinking now...I've never measured the 0-100 on my scoob

That's got me thinking now...I've never measured the 0-100 on my scoob

Originally Posted by TaviaRS
400+ IIRC Andy F is running in the 9s with over 400, as are others (just in case others get offended)
Originally Posted by ALi-B
Meaning he bogs down at the start and changes gear like a Granny 


Has a normal WR1 owner ever approached the claimed time?

And FFS, Let's not turn this into a WR1 thread.......
Geoff, at a guess, and I'm not an expert, but I reckon it'd probably be in the £5k plus bracket, probably more (unless you do a lot of the work yourself).
You might want to PM Andy, David Wallace or John BAnks to see what is required but I know it wouldn't be cheap!
You might want to PM Andy, David Wallace or John BAnks to see what is required but I know it wouldn't be cheap!
Thanks Tav, but I'm not in the business of wanting to go back to the guy to tell him his son is a liar and grind his face into the dirt, I just wanted to get a feel for an aspect of scoobs that I haven't really looked into, and to be better informed for future discussions! 

I could well be embarrassed if he has spent 4-5k on mods......


I could well be embarrassed if he has spent 4-5k on mods......
Hallelujah!! That's a real shame, isn't it? That it's relatively easy and cheap to get 4-500 bhp out of an *vo, but expensive and fraught with the spectre of disaster to do the same with a scoob. 
We know they're ace cars, though.

We know they're ace cars, though.
Originally Posted by TaviaRS
Indeed 
But then modded Scoobs never go bang do they?

But then modded Scoobs never go bang do they?

I'm sure a claim would be rejected for anything on the grounds it has been modified.
Dealership:
"Sorry sir, your seat stitching has come apart due to the power modifications which actually makes your warranty null and void."

Originally Posted by Bubba po
LOL.. Is that what everyone does? We can only just afford to run our scoob properly, without budgeting for fried clutches and mullered gearboxes, so I don't do speed trials in mine.
Has a normal WR1 owner ever approached the claimed time?
And FFS, Let's not turn this into a WR1 thread.......

Has a normal WR1 owner ever approached the claimed time?

And FFS, Let's not turn this into a WR1 thread.......
Originally Posted by Bartop
Type 25 does it in 10.64 according to http://www.letstorquebhp.com/
0-100 in 9.94
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
From: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Not tried the calculator thing, but I reckon on my modded (284bhp) WRX is getting around or just under 13secs 0-100 with a decent but not car-threatening launch etc. In straight line blast, there was nothing significant between me and an STi PPP I knew - his better gear ratios and 4bhp extra (measured on the same rollers on the same day) was offset by higher weight.
Even accepting the WR1 time, I wouldn't expect to see an exhaust and Tek'd STi (330-340bhp at PE) get under 11 secs 0-100, although I have no problem if someone can prove me wrong!
Edit to add - calculator thing agrees with me - 12.85 0-100.
Even accepting the WR1 time, I wouldn't expect to see an exhaust and Tek'd STi (330-340bhp at PE) get under 11 secs 0-100, although I have no problem if someone can prove me wrong!
Edit to add - calculator thing agrees with me - 12.85 0-100.
Last edited by hades; Jan 21, 2005 at 06:34 PM.






.................youll be getting a reputation..