MY05 Spec C
MY05 Spec C
For sale, my Spec C WR limited.
Imported by Litchfield in Jan 2007. Auction grade 5A. One UK owner.
25500 miles.
Taxed until Jan.
12 months MOT.
WR limited spec adds climate control, electric windows and blue WR interior.
Additions to standard spec:
Full Milltek sports cat exhaust
K+N panel filter
Integrated knock link
Whiteline ARB's front and rear (standard bars included)
BC coilovers (fitted June 21st, standard setup included)
Ferodo DS2500 front pads
BBS forged alloys with 235 RE070's
Team dynamics pro race 1's in white with 235 RE070's
Original STI alloys
Black headlight mod
Pillar-less grill
Produced 334bhp and 370Ft/Lb at DSA earlier this year.
Offers around £14,000
(Standard rear spoiler will be sold with the car and can be re-fitted if required)
Team Dynamics wheels
Imported by Litchfield in Jan 2007. Auction grade 5A. One UK owner.
25500 miles.
Taxed until Jan.
12 months MOT.
WR limited spec adds climate control, electric windows and blue WR interior.
Additions to standard spec:
Full Milltek sports cat exhaust
K+N panel filter
Integrated knock link
Whiteline ARB's front and rear (standard bars included)
BC coilovers (fitted June 21st, standard setup included)
Ferodo DS2500 front pads
BBS forged alloys with 235 RE070's
Team dynamics pro race 1's in white with 235 RE070's
Original STI alloys
Black headlight mod
Pillar-less grill
Produced 334bhp and 370Ft/Lb at DSA earlier this year.
Offers around £14,000
(Standard rear spoiler will be sold with the car and can be re-fitted if required)
Team Dynamics wheels
Last edited by madisonmonkey; Sep 28, 2009 at 04:51 PM. Reason: price reduction
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
From: Happy that I'm back in a Scooby - but maybe I should have told the wife...!
Stunning car If I had the money It`d be sold already.
IMHO if you refitted the spoiler your potential customers would increase dramatically Just my opinion.
IMHO if you refitted the spoiler your potential customers would increase dramatically Just my opinion.
Trending Topics
It'll be a sad day when it goes....
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 1
From: MSOC...Croxley Green
Mrs Mikee is still saying no to buying this, although I suspect it's more to do with the fact we're £14,995 short rather than her not wanting it. 
Spotless car, and a real looker, somebody is gonna be very lucky.
Spotless car, and a real looker, somebody is gonna be very lucky.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Fantastic Spec C!
Just wondered,standard power is listed as 335bhp with 280lb ft of torque
So the bhp you've quoted is spot-on but, you list the torque as 370lb ft???
Was that in error? If not, whats it had to produce an extra 90lb ft of torque over standard?
All youve listed as extra are the panel filter and exhaust and dont think those alone would account for the increase!
Regards. Matt
Just wondered,standard power is listed as 335bhp with 280lb ft of torque
So the bhp you've quoted is spot-on but, you list the torque as 370lb ft???
Was that in error? If not, whats it had to produce an extra 90lb ft of torque over standard?
All youve listed as extra are the panel filter and exhaust and dont think those alone would account for the increase!
Regards. Matt
Standard power isn't 335 
to get to that you need the mods that mine has:
panel filter
Full 3 inch system (in this case with sports cat)
re-map
The car that EVO tested and listed in the knowledge was from Litchfield and had been fettled to the same level as mine. 280 is the standard quoted torque figure so don't know why they list that
(error?)
I have two RR graphs for the car, one from Powerstation who did the re-map when the car first arrived and one from DSA done in April this year.
Powerstation figures - 335BHP 330FtLb
DSA figures - 334BHP 370FtLb
On the same day as the DSA RR several other known figure cars, including standard PPP'd and SleeperSy's 600+
, were run and made exactly the figures expected so I'm happy that the numbers are accurate (well as accurate as RR figures get) My mate RickyA ran his hawkeye spec c with similar spec but also a 3 port, up-rated actuator and bigger TMIC and made mid 340's BHP and 390 FtLb.
So in conclusion I cant tell you where the extra torque comes from but know of several similarly tuned spec c's making similar numbers.
What I do know is it has little trouble holding it's own against Subaru's that report much higher numbers
to get to that you need the mods that mine has:panel filter
Full 3 inch system (in this case with sports cat)
re-map
The car that EVO tested and listed in the knowledge was from Litchfield and had been fettled to the same level as mine. 280 is the standard quoted torque figure so don't know why they list that
(error?)I have two RR graphs for the car, one from Powerstation who did the re-map when the car first arrived and one from DSA done in April this year.
Powerstation figures - 335BHP 330FtLb
DSA figures - 334BHP 370FtLb
On the same day as the DSA RR several other known figure cars, including standard PPP'd and SleeperSy's 600+
, were run and made exactly the figures expected so I'm happy that the numbers are accurate (well as accurate as RR figures get) My mate RickyA ran his hawkeye spec c with similar spec but also a 3 port, up-rated actuator and bigger TMIC and made mid 340's BHP and 390 FtLb.So in conclusion
I cant tell you where the extra torque comes from but know of several similarly tuned spec c's making similar numbers.What I do know is it has little trouble holding it's own against Subaru's that report much higher numbers
btt
Mine was at DSA rollers on the day with this car & can vouch for figures & more importantly its real world power. I wouldnt worry too much about figures as a 340bhp (fly) Subaru on Powerstation rollers is equivilant to 360bhp plus on most other rollers. And if you try & compare those figures to e.g an Evo then its the same story.
Also on the topic of torque, IMO & from what I have researched, the Spec C engines do produce more torque as std than ever quoted. Mine made approx 315 bhp & 320ft/lb torque as standard. MadisonMonkeys torque figure is spot on too after mods he has done. On the same day I made 400ft/lb torque & 345bhp as I had similar mods except that I was running full decat/ uprated turbo actuator which meant I was able to hold 1.6 -1.7 bar peak boost which helped achieve such torque levels. Easily done on a Spec C IMO.
These cars have to be driven to be believed & fully appreciated
Mine was at DSA rollers on the day with this car & can vouch for figures & more importantly its real world power. I wouldnt worry too much about figures as a 340bhp (fly) Subaru on Powerstation rollers is equivilant to 360bhp plus on most other rollers. And if you try & compare those figures to e.g an Evo then its the same story.
Also on the topic of torque, IMO & from what I have researched, the Spec C engines do produce more torque as std than ever quoted. Mine made approx 315 bhp & 320ft/lb torque as standard. MadisonMonkeys torque figure is spot on too after mods he has done. On the same day I made 400ft/lb torque & 345bhp as I had similar mods except that I was running full decat/ uprated turbo actuator which meant I was able to hold 1.6 -1.7 bar peak boost which helped achieve such torque levels. Easily done on a Spec C IMO.
These cars have to be driven to be believed & fully appreciated
Last edited by rickya; Sep 13, 2009 at 03:39 PM.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
I saw this car last week & can assure any potential buyer it is a peach.
Ive had 2 x spec C's now both hawkeyes with low miles & looked at many more, this one is tighter & smoother than my 2 & all the others I looked at, it would make a great daily car.
The interior & body work is spotless & the suspension set up is perfect on the road.
Before you ask why did you not buy it - I am ideally looking for a dedicated track car so its always cheaper to buy a car after all of the work is completed - The searching continues !!!! (which may be a long time)
Good luck James !!!
Ive had 2 x spec C's now both hawkeyes with low miles & looked at many more, this one is tighter & smoother than my 2 & all the others I looked at, it would make a great daily car.
The interior & body work is spotless & the suspension set up is perfect on the road.
Before you ask why did you not buy it - I am ideally looking for a dedicated track car so its always cheaper to buy a car after all of the work is completed - The searching continues !!!! (which may be a long time)
Good luck James !!!
The carbon S202 one has a new home on the back of Guvs spec C
I saw this car last week & can assure any potential buyer it is a peach.
Ive had 2 x spec C's now both hawkeyes with low miles & looked at many more, this one is tighter & smoother than my 2 & all the others I looked at, it would make a great daily car.
The interior & body work is spotless & the suspension set up is perfect on the road.
Before you ask why did you not buy it - I am ideally looking for a dedicated track car so its always cheaper to buy a car after all of the work is completed - The searching continues !!!! (which may be a long time)
Good luck James !!!
Ive had 2 x spec C's now both hawkeyes with low miles & looked at many more, this one is tighter & smoother than my 2 & all the others I looked at, it would make a great daily car.
The interior & body work is spotless & the suspension set up is perfect on the road.
Before you ask why did you not buy it - I am ideally looking for a dedicated track car so its always cheaper to buy a car after all of the work is completed - The searching continues !!!! (which may be a long time)
Good luck James !!!
