Subaru type r.
I might be interested depending on mileage! Drop me an e-mail to matthewdalton@threedc.plus.com and let me know some more details/interior pics etc.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Adam M
version 3 cams should be more agressive hence ecu will differ slightly and cam belt tensioner was of a slightly different design.
Lovely car there.
Can you email me some more pics and any other info you may have on the car please to scoobycash@dsl.pipex.com.
Do you know if the transfers will come off without marking the paintwork?
Can you email me some more pics and any other info you may have on the car please to scoobycash@dsl.pipex.com.
Do you know if the transfers will come off without marking the paintwork?
sorry just seen this.
strictly speaking more aggressive cams can yield more torque and hence more power at that point, but more torque through the rev-range means better drivability.
It also means greater fuel consumption and usually a nastier idle, but I don't think the version 3 is that wild, just a little more wild than the version 4.
Of the 2 cam profiles, I would go with the version 3 engine over the 4 yes!
sorry for the thread hijack but it is a free bttt.
strictly speaking more aggressive cams can yield more torque and hence more power at that point, but more torque through the rev-range means better drivability.
It also means greater fuel consumption and usually a nastier idle, but I don't think the version 3 is that wild, just a little more wild than the version 4.
Of the 2 cam profiles, I would go with the version 3 engine over the 4 yes!
sorry for the thread hijack but it is a free bttt.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







