Female Genital Mutilation
We have had the first UK prosecution for FGM.
I think this is a very 'sensitive' subject. Of course it is a big cultural tradition for many in Africa but f*** me it's horrific and young girls are forcibly 'cut', often held down by family members. I don't know what goes through parents' minds to get involved in this :(. Any thoughts? Edit: Seems I was guilty of reading the article too quickly before needing to disappear. The first UK prosecution is 'imminent'. |
Just the thought of such a barbaric practise turns my stomach.
The trouble is that the reasons for this cruelty are based on religion, superstition (same thing?), and tribal custom, so stopping it is going to be nigh on impossible. |
HOW DARE YOU CRITICISE IT! It is diversity in action, which is good. You are just being racist.
There that's the lefty argument out of the way. In reality, its imported barbarism, and should be treated as GBH at the very least |
Seems to get swept under the carpet.
|
I think we all know which direction this is going to take and how it's going to end. :content:
|
totally barbaric
lets lump in male genital mutilation into the mix too |
To add to this, the BBC reported this morning that ONE IN FIVE UK police forces ignore, or do not treat seriously, so-called honour attacks against women:(
Well, we wanted diversity and cultural differences...we've got 'em! :( :( :( And the sad thing for me is it's often women arguing that it's RIGHT what goes on. |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11345863)
totally barbaric
lets lump in male genital mutilation into the mix too |
yep, we will get all the usual cleaner, healthier bollox
fully understand that some medical circumstances demand it - my older brother had the procedure at 18 but 3 day old baby boys!!!! |
Male circumcision isn't really practice here, unless there is reason for it we remain at one with our Foreskins. I know in the likes of the USofA your foreskin is living in fear of the knife at a early age.
|
Nuke em'
|
Originally Posted by ReallyReallyGoodMeat
(Post 11345865)
Was going to say that - why isn't circumcision on young boys met with the same outrage?
|
Hopefully this case is the first of many prosecutions.
There's no place for this kind of horror in our country |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 11345886)
Hopefully this case is the first of many prosecutions.
There's no place for this kind of horror in our country |
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 11345920)
Bizarre Magazine?
Oh I see now. Yes that would seem to be right up their street |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11345869)
yep, we will get all the usual cleaner, healthier bollox
fully understand that some medical circumstances demand it - my older brother had the procedure at 18 but 3 day old baby boys!!!! And many of the medical reasons have been disproven too. |
Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
(Post 11345883)
It's not really the same. If it was like FGM it would be like losing your bell end.
|
I hesitate to ask this, (yes, really!!), but how do the usual suspects on here reconcile NOT allowing this, with their usual stance on cultural and religious freedoms?
|
I wonder what is the the justification for such an action.
Les |
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11346016)
This. I understand the comparison, but without going in to too much detail these two practices have very different consequences.
|
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11346106)
I wonder what is the the justification for such an action.
Les |
Hi Les
|
I'm gonna sound like a complete tit here i know... but what exactly is it they do when they carry this out.
I know what circumcision is on boys.. but until this came up on the news, i had no idea about it. It sound barbaric, whatever it is. And anything that involves a woman (or man) having their body tampered with without their full knowledge, understanding and ultimately PERMISSION, just has to be totally wrong. That's about as much as i can comment without knowing the full facts i guess. |
Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
(Post 11346116)
Well both would lead to loss of sensation in a big way.
|
Originally Posted by hawky666
(Post 11346131)
I'm gonna sound like a complete tit here i know... but what exactly is it they do when they carry this out.
I know what circumcision is on boys.. but until this came up on the news, i had no idea about it. It sound barbaric, whatever it is. And anything that involves a woman (or man) having their body tampered with without their full knowledge, understanding and ultimately PERMISSION, just has to be totally wrong. That's about as much as i can comment without knowing the full facts i guess. Not a fun read! |
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 11346138)
|
Jesus.. that's making me feel sick reading it.
How barbaric... and exactly what does anyone believe can be gained from causing such suffering. |
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11346136)
Yes, I know, I was agreeing with you that FGM and circumcision do not produce a comparable loss of sensation. As you say, the comparison would be having the male's glans penis removed.
|
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11346156)
But presumably you agree that both are genital mutilation, just the degree of sensation that is lost
|
That may well be true, but both, as you say involve differing levels of butchery to a persons genitals
And as I held each of my newborn children, still hot and fresh from my wife's womb - I viewed both pactices as ancient barbaric tribal rituals that have no place in 21st century humanity |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands