That's a great message to send out
|
well, it's the truth.
|
(on world class level like the TdF, 100 m dash,... fwiw)
|
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
(Post 11135365)
well, it's the truth.
|
As Wiggins says: "I don't believe anything that comes out of his mouth anymore"
|
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
(Post 11135366)
(on world class level like the TdF, 100 m dash,... fwiw)
Just to even things up. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
(Post 11135365)
well, it's the truth.
|
Originally Posted by ritchie21
(Post 11135372)
I'd like to put you in a room with Sir Bradley Wiggins and see you repeat that comment!
And regarding the hit man comparison: this is not about ethics or moral standards, but reality. |
If you can't win without cheating then it's quite simple, you are not good enough.
End of. |
Wrong. It's still the best athlete who wins. It's just a matter of levelling out the playing field. Think of a car race where everyone is restricted to 2.0 l engines, but in fact everyone has a tuned 2.5 l engine. Everybody cheats, but in the end it's still the best driver who wins the race. Of course, from time to time some poor fella will get caught, maybe because he lacks the political influence or protection from sponsors who pay millions to the FIA, or because he pissed on the leg of one of the top drivers, or maybe because he was walking through the pits bragging how tuned his engine was. But all the other guys are pretty safe.
|
Have you tried cycling on drugs? I did and I kept falling off... ;)
|
I think he's right - everyone was doing it and he couldn't have won without it.
Things may be different now & Sir Bradley may well be cleaner than clean. Hindsight is a wonderful thing & just doing what everyone else did always looks bad after the event, even though it seemed OK at the time - ask a 2007 Mortgage Broker, a LIBOR Banker or Stuart Hall....... |
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
(Post 11135499)
Wrong. It's still the best athlete who wins. It's just a matter of levelling out the playing field. Think of a car race where everyone is restricted to 2.0 l engines, but in fact everyone has a tuned 2.5 l engine. Everybody cheats, but in the end it's still the best driver who wins the race. Of course, from time to time some poor fella will get caught, maybe because he lacks the political influence or protection from sponsors who pay millions to the FIA, or because he pissed on the leg of one of the top drivers, or maybe because he was walking through the pits bragging how tuned his engine was. But all the other guys are pretty safe.
What a load of cobblers. |
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
(Post 11135499)
Wrong. It's still the best athlete who wins. It's just a matter of levelling out the playing field. Think of a car race where everyone is restricted to 2.0 l engines, but in fact everyone has a tuned 2.5 l engine. Everybody cheats, but in the end it's still the best driver who wins the race. Of course, from time to time some poor fella will get caught, maybe because he lacks the political influence or protection from sponsors who pay millions to the FIA, or because he pissed on the leg of one of the top drivers, or maybe because he was walking through the pits bragging how tuned his engine was. But all the other guys are pretty safe.
|
Originally Posted by Blue by You
(Post 11135515)
So what you're saying is that all the atheletes take drugs, and only one got found out :cuckoo: :lol1:
What a load of cobblers. Trust me, I know how this system works. Sad but true :( |
Originally Posted by Blue by You
(Post 11135515)
So what you're saying is that all the atheletes take drugs, and only one got found out :cuckoo: :lol1:
What a load of cobblers. Did you actually read the article - or look at the graph :eek: |
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
(Post 11135517)
You're entitled your own opinion :thumb: But maybe you want to ask yourself why Bernhard Kohl was only convicted once although he was tested 200+ times and he himself admitted that he was on drugs while giving those samples. Or why Lance Armstrong has never tested positive (except 1999, but that's another story).
Trust me, I know how this system works. Sad but true :( But if you have personal insider knowledge or experience then that would shed a different light on your statement:thumb: |
Stupid sport followed by the incredibly gullible.
|
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 11135585)
Stupid sport followed by the incredibly gullible.
|
It was pandemic in cycling a few years ago, even 10 years ago.
The whole sport is a lot cleaner now but by no means has doping been eradicated. Whole teams were promoting it but I think that changed somewhat. To say that you have to dope to win is bollocks. Cycling is probably the cleanest it's ever been, so it's much more of a level playing field than before. You just need to look at the times they're doing the big climbs in, i.e. longer than before, to prove it. |
Originally Posted by Blue by You
(Post 11135577)
But if you have personal insider knowledge or experience then that would shed a different light on your statement:thumb:
|
You need a boost to get to within shouting distance?
|
Originally Posted by Bubba po
(Post 11135597)
Totally unlike F1. :)
More entertaining than the tour, except yesterday maybe when that bus got trapped on the finsh line :o |
Originally Posted by SJ_Skyline
(Post 11135502)
Have you tried cycling on drugs? I did and I kept falling off... ;)
|
Originally Posted by dpb
(Post 11136588)
Have to say today's F1 race was actually worth watching. ..:eek:
|
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 11135585)
Stupid sport followed by the incredibly gullible.
In regards to drug taking in any sport, as already stated above, if you have to take drugs, you ain't good enough. How Lance Armstrong can say what he said is ridiculous. Someone HAS to win, simple as that. If you dont take drugs and don't win, its a simple case of being beaten by a better person. There's plenty of completely clean world champions, who, funnily enough, have beaten off all the competition.....by being quicker / fitter / better than them through putting in the hours and hard work, not taking drugs, plain and simple. |
Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
(Post 11136610)
I suggest all F1 races could be made exciting by putting 4 random duff tyres in the tyre pool for each race :lol1:.
|
Originally Posted by Peedee
(Post 11136616)
Of all the 13,005 dumb comments that you've written over the years, that rates pretty highly among the dumbest of the dumb! I'm interested to know what you actually base that statement on?
P.S. Glad to know you have read all 13000 plus comments I have made.... you are indeed a prize stalker amongst other things |
Originally Posted by f1_fan
(Post 11136755)
Er... have you been on Planet Earth for the last 20 years and watched one cyclist after another test positive for banned substances? Why follow a sport so corrupt and hero worship cheats unless you are a gullible tw4t? Hope that explains it in words you can understand. If not let me know and I will write it Ladybird book style so you can maybe get it :thumb:
P.S. Glad to know you have read all 13000 plus comments I have made.... you are indeed a prize stalker amongst other things I've no doubt your just some overweight 40-something that has never had any interest (or been good at) any sport whatsoever (I'm guessing you were probably bullied at school for being a fatty aswell?), unless it involves letting a machine or animal do all the work? Perhaps if you had competed in some sort of physical sport you would understand, but then again, that would have made you a "gullible tw4t" because you would have been interested in it!! P.S, your comment count is just underneath you name, and secondly, everything that I've seen you type is complete and utter sh1te, so its not too hard to guess that all 13,000 odd posts are along the same lines! |
Originally Posted by Peedee
(Post 11136922)
And how is that different to any other sport? The are drug takers / dopers etc in every sport, not just cycling, its just a case of whether those sportsmen / women get away with it and whether it ends up in the news or not. No doubt there are 'current' high-profile sports stars in ALL sports that are cheating through using drugs etc, so does that make every one of those different sports rubbish or just followed by gullible tw4ts?. No.
Originally Posted by Peedee
(Post 11136922)
I've no doubt your just some overweight 40-something that has never had any interest (or been good at) any sport whatsoever (I'm guessing you were probably bullied at school for being a fatty aswell?), unless it involves letting a machine or animal do all the work? Perhaps if you had competed in some sort of physical sport you would understand, but then again, that would have made you a "gullible tw4t" because you would have been interested in it!!
Now if you want to watch a sport that celebrates cheats then that is up to you, but IMO says a lot about your character!
Originally Posted by Peedee
(Post 11136922)
P.S, your comment count is just underneath you name, and secondly, everything that I've seen you type is complete and utter sh1te, so its not too hard to guess that all 13,000 odd posts are along the same lines!
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands