ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   Getting pregnant at 12 after a one night stand was the smartest thing I ever did ! (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/942526-getting-pregnant-at-12-after-a-one-night-stand-was-the-smartest-thing-i-ever-did.html)

Carlh 10 July 2012 10:06 AM

Getting pregnant at 12 after a one night stand was the smartest thing I ever did !
 
Britain's youngest mother insists getting pregnant at 12 after a one night stand was 'the smartest thing I ever did' - because she's now a size 6 and can go clubbing with her friends


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/ar...ing-I-did.html

FFS.

f1_fan 10 July 2012 10:35 AM

Love the way you lot let the Daily Mail push your buttons.

Ignore it, it's media sensationalised sh1te and if the Leveson Enquiry actually had some teeth these so called newspapers would all be closed down by now!

Frosticles 10 July 2012 10:39 AM

What is totally wrong with today's society. Also, She is a PIG.

legacy_gtb 10 July 2012 10:40 AM

"Amy, who is on benefits and lives in a council house"

No suprise there then!

"A woman who became Britain's youngest mother after a one night stand at the age of 12 says she had no regrets about becoming a teen mum...........

....... Of course I wish it had never happened but it's too late now"

sounds like regret to me!

"I'm not that bothered"

Where have i heard that before??????

Scroungey chav scum! ...... glad she gets enough government handouts from my hard earned taxes to afford to go clubbing though .... the systems obviously working brilliantly!

legacy_gtb 10 July 2012 10:42 AM

f1 fan .... know what your saying, with newspaper stories you have to take everything with a massive pinch of salt, but how can you possibly put a spin on this?

Its just wrong!

chocolate_o_brian 10 July 2012 10:42 AM

It's been in a few papers and afaik the facts are accurate. Probably some spin on it for sensationalism as above but a sad state off affairs.

And she is a proper mong, size six or not!!!

Ant 10 July 2012 10:54 AM

Size 6 my arse, what a ugly woman.

JTaylor 10 July 2012 10:55 AM

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&sou...6H1iX7gc_nOyvw

:lol1:

David Lock 10 July 2012 11:05 AM

Why don't they do the father for statutory rape?

dl

Frosticles 10 July 2012 11:11 AM


Originally Posted by JTaylor (Post 10701181)

Love it. Proper comedy :thumb:

Leslie 10 July 2012 11:13 AM

They would not have the guts to do it!

The whole business including her attitude is a tragic story really. Modern moral degradation is doing nothing any good for this country or the people.

Les

legacy_gtb 10 July 2012 11:19 AM


Originally Posted by David Lock (Post 10701189)
Why don't they do the father for statutory rape?

dl

Theres no point crying over spilt (man)milk!

He was only 15 so theres nowt they could do anyway.


..... as someone without kids, i might be missing something here, but is there something ethically wrong with enforced abortion for people getting up the spout underage?

ALi-B 10 July 2012 11:22 AM

This is Britain 2012

Its ok not to be responsible for your own actions. Let the council provide you with a home, let the government take care of the bills and living expenses as well as funding your cannabis habit, along with the extra tutition because she didn't bother with school. And just dump the kids with their grandmother as and when it suits (as if the grandmother is a upstanding citizen either) so she can go out on the lash.

Anything more to add? Other than when did size 6s come in a size 10? ;)

dpb 10 July 2012 11:24 AM

But we're the mugs paying for it. ( all you blairites)

Still , thanks to Tory we won't be funding her back to college fee

specialx 10 July 2012 11:45 AM


Originally Posted by legacy_gtb (Post 10701214)

i might be missing something here, but is there something ethically wrong with enforced abortion for people getting up the spout underage?


My thought's entirely if you cannot support yourself how the feck could you be expected to look after a child as well!

Why do we allow these pregnancies to happen?

It's everyone's right to have a child but don't expect me or the state to pay for it!

I really feel the government should step in and stop this.

Do you work?

Do you have you own accommodation?


If you cannot achieve these 2 basics in life then why the hell should the taxpayer pay for their ignorance!!

I've had the snip because I'm educated enough to know I cannot afford to give any more than 2 children the lifestyle I feel adequate yet drive to work past estates of feckwhitts who get paid to create chav scum!!

Good old England!! :rolleyes::thumb:

The Zohan 10 July 2012 11:49 AM


Originally Posted by ALi-B (Post 10701219)
This is Britain 2012

Its ok not to be responsible for your own actions. Let the council provide you with a home, let the government take care of the bills and living expenses as well as funding your cannabis habit, along with the extra tutition because she didn't bother with school. And just dump the kids with their grandmother as and when it suits (as if the grandmother is a upstanding citizen either) so she can go out on the lash.

Anything more to add? Other than when did size 6s come in a size 10? ;)

Sums up the situation nicely!

legacy_gtb 10 July 2012 11:56 AM

^ absa feckin lootley!

For the first time in history the species is experiencing devolution!

Dullards see becoming a baby factory as a career choice, and pump out more little tw@s to get theyre compo and free housing.

where as the more intelligent and successful people generally have less children and think more carefully about those they do have ( ^ as adam has shown a good example of ).

20 years time when all these little pricks get dragged up by theyre f*ck wit donut parents, this countrys going to be in a pretty sorry state!

windyboy 10 July 2012 12:17 PM

if she has any problems Jeremy Kyle will sort them out

ALi-B 10 July 2012 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by specialx (Post 10701254)
My thought's entirely if you cannot support yourself how the feck could you be expected to look after a child as well!

Why do we allow these pregnancies to happen?

It's everyone's right to have a child but don't expect me or the state to pay for it!

I really feel the government should step in and stop this.

Do you work?

Do you have you own accommodation?


If you cannot achieve these 2 basics in life then why the hell should the taxpayer pay for their ignorance!!

I've had the snip because I'm educated enough to know I cannot afford to give any more than 2 children the lifestyle I feel adequate yet drive to work past estates of feckwhitts who get paid to create chav scum!!

Good old England!! :rolleyes::thumb:


Its a point:

When a woman/couple who are mentally handicapped or suffer severe learning difficulties who want children, social services intervene. Also there have been cases where Down's sufferers who have undergone hysterectomies to prevent them having children.

Surely if this is the case thatpeople who are deemed to have a mental age of a child are automatically assumed not to be capeable of bringing up a baby and have to be vetted to prove otherwise, then why does it appear to be the reverse when its a child/teenager that falls pregnent who technically has the same mental age?

I don't suppose anyone has seen that Long Lost Family program? If you can get past the annoyance of Davina McCall, its a pretty heart wrenching program. But in a number cases the child was put for adoption becuase the mother a)was a child herself, b) was out of wedlock with the child's father being errant, therefore brought shame on the family c) there were no financial menas to care for the baby (likely due to mother being disowned, see b) again ).

I think in most cases the birth mother regretted it (her own fault IMO), but I also think that in most of those cases the adopted child in all likliness has a good upbringing and no doubt a much better upbringing with the adopted parents; Two parents, an income via work, and a family that stuck round and protected each other, not a fragmented one.

It seems today it doesn't matter if there is no family entity to bring up a child, as the government will step in and throw money at it instead. On a political level, its almost completely accepted in ths day and age that a woman (or a girl) can bring up a child on her own with government/council support. Its this government support that I feel has caused mass fragmentation of what should be a family entity, contributing to a further a decay of social structure and order.

:(

specialx 10 July 2012 12:22 PM

+ 1 Ali-B! :thumb:


State funded children should not be an expected right.

Leslie 10 July 2012 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by legacy_gtb (Post 10701214)
Theres no point crying over spilt (man)milk!

He was only 15 so theres nowt they could do anyway.


..... as someone without kids, i might be missing something here, but is there something ethically wrong with enforced abortion for people getting up the spout underage?


Taking your statement to its logical conclusion, if you had an infant baby that you found you could not support financially, would you be prepared to knock it on the head and dispose of it?

What you suggest comes to the same thing when you think about it!

Les

joz8968 10 July 2012 12:31 PM


Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 10701301)
Taking your statement to its logical conclusion, if you had an infant baby that you found you could not support financially, would you be prepared to knock it on the head and dispose of it?

Really worryingly, only a few months back, scientists put forward this idea! WTF!!

f1_fan 10 July 2012 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by legacy_gtb (Post 10701269)
^ absa feckin lootley!

For the first time in history the species is experiencing devolution!

Dullards see becoming a baby factory as a career choice, and pump out more little tw@s to get theyre compo and free housing.

where as the more intelligent and successful people generally have less children and think more carefully about those they do have ( ^ as adam has shown a good example of ).

20 years time when all these little pricks get dragged up by theyre f*ck wit donut parents, this countrys going to be in a pretty sorry state!

I got absolutely caned on here for posting that exact point of view a few years ago. How times change eh?

Culling the stupid would be a good idea ;) Mind you NSR would be even quieter then :lol1:

legacy_gtb 10 July 2012 12:33 PM

Not true Les!

Theres a difference between-

-having a kid when the goings good, then needing help because you become a victim of circumstance and your situation changes to mean you cant properly support it.

-having a kid when your already in a position of not being able to support it, knowing full well the state will foot the bill!

Problem is, the infrastructure is there and in my opinion vital and justifyed for people of the former, then abused massively by people in the latter! like this chav scum baby factory.

ALi-B 10 July 2012 12:34 PM

If it comes to the point that it financially destitutes the country? We turned a blind eye to China doing it.

I don't think anyone is implying it is right, but moreso a potential necessary evil.

Afterall we were a country who was quite happy to intentionally bomb and kill civillians for the sakes of global warfare. So maybe the UK has lost its ruthlessness?

legacy_gtb 10 July 2012 12:36 PM


Originally Posted by f1_fan (Post 10701305)
I got absolutely caned on here for posting that exact point of view a few years ago. How times change eh?

Culling the stupid would be a good idea ;) Mind you NSR would be even quieter then :lol1:


Dont think we need to cull the stupid ..... but we DEFINATELY need to find a way to stop them multiplying!

f1_fan 10 July 2012 12:39 PM


Originally Posted by legacy_gtb (Post 10701310)
Dont think we need to cull the stupid ..... but we DEFINATELY need to find a way to stop them multiplying!

Yes..... by culling them ;) :lol1:

Oh and ahem ... DEFINITELY :thumb: ;)

fivetide 10 July 2012 12:40 PM


Originally Posted by legacy_gtb (Post 10701214)
Theres no point crying over spilt (man)milk!

He was only 15 so theres nowt they could do anyway.

Rubbish. Lock him up as a paedo.

Same with anyone else in this situation. The problem is there are no consequences for doing it, only benefits from being handed out cash.

If the law was actually enforced I bet the level would drop over night, or at least sales of johnnys would rocket.

5t.

specialx 10 July 2012 12:42 PM


Originally Posted by Leslie (Post 10701301)
Taking your statement to its logical conclusion, if you had an infant baby that you found you could not support financially, would you be prepared to knock it on the head and dispose of it?

What you suggest comes to the same thing when you think about it!

Les

I think the fact is Les that you wouldn't let this happen if you could not support it, it's that simple. Stop the problem before it starts.

joz8968 10 July 2012 12:45 PM


Originally Posted by fivetide (Post 10701314)
..or at least sales of johnnys would rocket.

5t.

Rocket Rubbers

There's a marketing opportunity there, surely?!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands