ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Other Marques (https://www.scoobynet.com/other-marques-33/)
-   -   Porsche Carrera 4S vs 335i (remapped) (https://www.scoobynet.com/other-marques-33/871145-porsche-carrera-4s-vs-335i-remapped.html)

SPIDERWRX 01 February 2011 11:51 PM

Porsche Carrera 4S vs 335i (remapped)
 
A Friend has just got a Carrera 4S 57 plate, lovey car :thumb:
This weekend we are going to see if my 335i can keep up :wonder:

what u think?

zip106 01 February 2011 11:57 PM

Yes, up to about 150mph then he'll pi$$ all over you.
He should be far quicker off the line unless you're doing a rolling start.

HTH. :)

But surely to be fair, you should be up against a mapped C4s?

Trout 01 February 2011 11:59 PM

It is a pointless question.












We all know the race will be invalid due to the lack of an Audi in the line up.

SRSport 02 February 2011 12:00 AM

Interesting call.
As standard the Porsche is ahead by 50ish BHP, equal on torque, Porsche weighs 200KG less.
I would hazard a guess that a remapped 335i would edge it in a straight line but loose everywhere else.
Look forward to finding out how you get on.

Trout 02 February 2011 12:02 AM


Originally Posted by SPIDERWRX (Post 9856712)
A Friend has just got a Carrera 4S 57 plate, lovey car :thumb:
This weekend we are going to see if my 335i can keep up :wonder:

what u think?

Which one is being dropped by the helicopter?

SPIDERWRX 02 February 2011 12:18 AM

the Audi, its way faster

SPIDERWRX 02 February 2011 12:28 AM

BMW 335i 384bhp & 420 lb-ft weighs 1550/1600kg RWD Manual

Carrera 4S 350bhp & 295 lb-ft weighs 1475kg 4WD Manual

i know the carrera 4s is a much better car :-)

i think the carrera 4s will be faster off the line.
but once rolling its going to be fun

paulwrxboro 02 February 2011 02:17 AM

there will be nowt in it, i recon

Andy M3 02 February 2011 11:19 AM


Originally Posted by paulwrxboro (Post 9856801)
there will be nowt in it, i recon

This, plus 911's are very slippery through the air and bat on top end. :thumb:

stilover 02 February 2011 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by SPIDERWRX (Post 9856712)
A Friend has just got a Carrera 4S 57 plate, lovey car :thumb:
This weekend we are going to see if my 335i can keep up :wonder:

what u think?

I think he should have bought a Turbo instead.

SPEN555 02 February 2011 01:08 PM


Originally Posted by Trout (Post 9856728)
Which one is being dropped by the helicopter?

I recon it will be a dead heat with speed of ~120mph :D

ps If I ever see Hammond in person he's gonna get some grief off me doing $hite like that!

Matteeboy 02 February 2011 01:38 PM

Very close I reckon. Your torque advantage should help you hammer it out of bends.

john banks 02 February 2011 01:53 PM

Does the 335i have LSD and uprated brakes? If not try to have a roll race in a straight line in the dry and stop before the speeds get too high.

Dingdongler 02 February 2011 02:17 PM

Is it a straight line drag?

Matteeboy 02 February 2011 04:18 PM

Track 335i Coupe 997 Carrera 4S
Autozeitung test track 1:45.80 1:43.50
Serres Racing Circuit 1:35.25 1:33.20
Inta 1:14.58 1:12.73

Now that's without the 335i being remapped - very very close indeed.

SRSport 02 February 2011 04:28 PM

That doesn't reflect too well on the Porsche really does it? A little quicker than a Beemer, half its price. Does the coupe share the same platform as the lardy 4 door family saloon?

zip106 02 February 2011 04:39 PM


Originally Posted by SRSport (Post 9857491)
That doesn't reflect too well on the Porsche really does it? A little quicker than a Beemer, half its price. Does the coupe share the same platform as the lardy 4 door family saloon?

Get out.

One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.

There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.

Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!

:thumb:

Maz 02 February 2011 05:12 PM

Which track is it taking place on?

SRSport 02 February 2011 05:30 PM


Originally Posted by zip106 (Post 9857512)
Get out.

One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.

There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.

Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!

:thumb:

Exactly,

I thought people bought Porsches because they were sports cars designed to be quick. I would have thought that the point above would have been relevant if the car in question was an S class not a Porsche 911 C4S.

Matteeboy 02 February 2011 05:33 PM

I was only relaying facts! Coupe is actually heavier than the saloon. Touring slightly heavier than both but more less drag. 335d track time at Brunters quicker than a 335i ;-) By a massive 0.1s!

john banks 02 February 2011 05:50 PM

The C4S with power kit manages to dip into the 11s on a quarter mile. That fulfils my definition of quick. A few tuned 335i manage to get into the 11s.

john banks 02 February 2011 05:53 PM

https://www.dragtimes.com/images/140...7-BMW-335i.jpg

Typical example of 11 sec 335i - Hoosier, LSD, transmission mods, passenger seat out, FMIC, tune, exhaust, intake, funny fuel/meth inj isn't denied.

zip106 02 February 2011 06:41 PM


Originally Posted by SRSport (Post 9857611)
Exactly,

I thought people bought Porsches because they were sports cars designed to be quick. I would have thought that the point above would have been relevant if the car in question was an S class not a Porsche 911 C4S.

What I was getting at was 'who cares'?

So what if a car costs 2x that of a faster tuned car?

I can hear the stampede of all those Pork drivers rushing to the nearest BMW showroom.....

P1Fanatic 02 February 2011 06:59 PM

Just make sure you take a video so we see what happens :)

SRSport 02 February 2011 07:19 PM

Spiderwrx what sort of test will you be doing?

Matteeboy 02 February 2011 08:15 PM

Zip - chill out! Loads of sub £5k Scoobs would batter my car and many others. Do I want one? No. No one is saying the BM is a better car. It's just a little bit of fun.

zip106 02 February 2011 08:38 PM


Originally Posted by Matteeboy (Post 9857944)
Zip - chill out! Loads of sub £5k Scoobs would batter my car and many others. Do I want one? No. No one is saying the BM is a better car. It's just a little bit of fun.

Stressed to the eyeballs Mattee - that's what 6 weeks of no driving does to you!
But tomorrow..... the cars coming out from it's slumber :luxhello:

john banks 02 February 2011 08:46 PM

I rate a performance car on its ability to go, stop and corner with reliability, practicality and civility relative to its costs. I can't actually recall ever driving a car that goes, stops and corners properly that has such a severe problem with steering or "handling" that it would put me off. Image doesn't matter to me, and history/brand values are arguably an encumbrance to producing the best engines, chassis and brakes. For example, BMW and Porsche don't fit proper diffs to midrange models to avoid trespassing on the ground of the halo models. Porsche insist on keeping the 911 rear engined because of heritage. BMW doggedly stick to a weight distribution that is based around a marketing ideal rather than something which gives best traction, and then fit single piston brakes which are only useful for shopping trips.

And whilst we're here, in showing no brand bias, Subaru insist on building weak 2.5 litre engines with poor exhaust manifold design and 5 speed gearboxes, Mitsubishi make their strongest gearboxes missing a 6th gear, Nissan have stupid service intervals, poor cooling and an excessively rear biased torque distribution that doesn't capitalise on the benefits of AWD as well as an Evo.

Just my 2p, some will certainly disagree :) I was near to buying a 997 or a 335i last year after all, and none of the options are anywhere near to perfection.

My idea of perfection:

Front mid engined aluminium supercharged V8 (probably LSx) with AWD, low weight, good aero with some downforce, massive brakes, proper rear diff, 2 seats, big boot, non-RFT, electronically adjustable suspension and a rear mounted automatic gearbox (not dual clutch).

No one builds it of course, but it brings together my ideals.

SPIDERWRX 02 February 2011 09:41 PM


Originally Posted by Dingdongler (Post 9857285)
Is it a straight line drag?

yeah, rolling start, (his c4s has just had a new clutch fitted)



Originally Posted by SRSport (Post 9857285)
what sort of test will you be doing?

20mph to top speeds of both cars
60mph to 100mph

we are going to a airfield, his dad flys a plane there (not a race track)

Dingdongler 02 February 2011 10:26 PM


Originally Posted by zip106 (Post 9857512)
Get out.

One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.

There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.

Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!

:thumb:


Zip, it does beg the question though why does a custom built 2+2 sports car coupe that costs so much more and is far less practical barely beat a middle of the road family car/rep mobile around a track??

It's not the same as comparing the Porsche with a nos injected piece of jap crap with a 2p interior. The beemer is still a well put together reliable non chavvy car that is unmodified.
You would have expected the Porsche to kill the humble 3 series beemer, it's not even a M car.

I'm beginning to wonder whether my diesel pipe and slippers 5 series would be faster than your tt around a track;):lol1:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands