Porsche Carrera 4S vs 335i (remapped)
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 335i LAND
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Porsche Carrera 4S vs 335i (remapped)
A Friend has just got a Carrera 4S 57 plate, lovey car
This weekend we are going to see if my 335i can keep up
what u think?
This weekend we are going to see if my 335i can keep up
what u think?
#2
Yes, up to about 150mph then he'll pi$$ all over you.
He should be far quicker off the line unless you're doing a rolling start.
HTH.
But surely to be fair, you should be up against a mapped C4s?
He should be far quicker off the line unless you're doing a rolling start.
HTH.
But surely to be fair, you should be up against a mapped C4s?
#4
Scooby Regular
Interesting call.
As standard the Porsche is ahead by 50ish BHP, equal on torque, Porsche weighs 200KG less.
I would hazard a guess that a remapped 335i would edge it in a straight line but loose everywhere else.
Look forward to finding out how you get on.
As standard the Porsche is ahead by 50ish BHP, equal on torque, Porsche weighs 200KG less.
I would hazard a guess that a remapped 335i would edge it in a straight line but loose everywhere else.
Look forward to finding out how you get on.
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 335i LAND
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW 335i 384bhp & 420 lb-ft weighs 1550/1600kg RWD Manual
Carrera 4S 350bhp & 295 lb-ft weighs 1475kg 4WD Manual
i know the carrera 4s is a much better car :-)
i think the carrera 4s will be faster off the line.
but once rolling its going to be fun
Carrera 4S 350bhp & 295 lb-ft weighs 1475kg 4WD Manual
i know the carrera 4s is a much better car :-)
i think the carrera 4s will be faster off the line.
but once rolling its going to be fun
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Track 335i Coupe 997 Carrera 4S
Autozeitung test track 1:45.80 1:43.50
Serres Racing Circuit 1:35.25 1:33.20
Inta 1:14.58 1:12.73
Now that's without the 335i being remapped - very very close indeed.
Autozeitung test track 1:45.80 1:43.50
Serres Racing Circuit 1:35.25 1:33.20
Inta 1:14.58 1:12.73
Now that's without the 335i being remapped - very very close indeed.
#16
Scooby Regular
That doesn't reflect too well on the Porsche really does it? A little quicker than a Beemer, half its price. Does the coupe share the same platform as the lardy 4 door family saloon?
#17
One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.
There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.
Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!
Last edited by zip106; 02 February 2011 at 04:41 PM.
#19
Scooby Regular
Get out.
One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.
There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.
Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!
One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.
There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.
Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!
I thought people bought Porsches because they were sports cars designed to be quick. I would have thought that the point above would have been relevant if the car in question was an S class not a Porsche 911 C4S.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was only relaying facts! Coupe is actually heavier than the saloon. Touring slightly heavier than both but more less drag. 335d track time at Brunters quicker than a 335i ;-) By a massive 0.1s!
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Typical example of 11 sec 335i - Hoosier, LSD, transmission mods, passenger seat out, FMIC, tune, exhaust, intake, funny fuel/meth inj isn't denied.
Last edited by john banks; 02 February 2011 at 05:56 PM.
#23
So what if a car costs 2x that of a faster tuned car?
I can hear the stampede of all those Pork drivers rushing to the nearest BMW showroom.....
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Zip - chill out! Loads of sub £5k Scoobs would batter my car and many others. Do I want one? No. No one is saying the BM is a better car. It's just a little bit of fun.
#27
But tomorrow..... the cars coming out from it's slumber
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I rate a performance car on its ability to go, stop and corner with reliability, practicality and civility relative to its costs. I can't actually recall ever driving a car that goes, stops and corners properly that has such a severe problem with steering or "handling" that it would put me off. Image doesn't matter to me, and history/brand values are arguably an encumbrance to producing the best engines, chassis and brakes. For example, BMW and Porsche don't fit proper diffs to midrange models to avoid trespassing on the ground of the halo models. Porsche insist on keeping the 911 rear engined because of heritage. BMW doggedly stick to a weight distribution that is based around a marketing ideal rather than something which gives best traction, and then fit single piston brakes which are only useful for shopping trips.
And whilst we're here, in showing no brand bias, Subaru insist on building weak 2.5 litre engines with poor exhaust manifold design and 5 speed gearboxes, Mitsubishi make their strongest gearboxes missing a 6th gear, Nissan have stupid service intervals, poor cooling and an excessively rear biased torque distribution that doesn't capitalise on the benefits of AWD as well as an Evo.
Just my 2p, some will certainly disagree I was near to buying a 997 or a 335i last year after all, and none of the options are anywhere near to perfection.
My idea of perfection:
Front mid engined aluminium supercharged V8 (probably LSx) with AWD, low weight, good aero with some downforce, massive brakes, proper rear diff, 2 seats, big boot, non-RFT, electronically adjustable suspension and a rear mounted automatic gearbox (not dual clutch).
No one builds it of course, but it brings together my ideals.
And whilst we're here, in showing no brand bias, Subaru insist on building weak 2.5 litre engines with poor exhaust manifold design and 5 speed gearboxes, Mitsubishi make their strongest gearboxes missing a 6th gear, Nissan have stupid service intervals, poor cooling and an excessively rear biased torque distribution that doesn't capitalise on the benefits of AWD as well as an Evo.
Just my 2p, some will certainly disagree I was near to buying a 997 or a 335i last year after all, and none of the options are anywhere near to perfection.
My idea of perfection:
Front mid engined aluminium supercharged V8 (probably LSx) with AWD, low weight, good aero with some downforce, massive brakes, proper rear diff, 2 seats, big boot, non-RFT, electronically adjustable suspension and a rear mounted automatic gearbox (not dual clutch).
No one builds it of course, but it brings together my ideals.
Last edited by john banks; 02 February 2011 at 08:52 PM.
#29
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 335i LAND
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, rolling start, (his c4s has just had a new clutch fitted)
20mph to top speeds of both cars
60mph to 100mph
we are going to a airfield, his dad flys a plane there (not a race track)
20mph to top speeds of both cars
60mph to 100mph
we are going to a airfield, his dad flys a plane there (not a race track)
Last edited by SPIDERWRX; 02 February 2011 at 09:45 PM.
#30
Scooby Regular
Get out.
One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.
There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.
Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!
One's a middle manager rep mobile (no offence intended) the other's a premium sports coupe with a long lineage of sporting history.
There's quite a few cars out there faster than other cars out there that cost a fair bit less.
Might surprise you, but *some* people buy a car because of what it is, not because it might be quicker than some ricer!
Zip, it does beg the question though why does a custom built 2+2 sports car coupe that costs so much more and is far less practical barely beat a middle of the road family car/rep mobile around a track??
It's not the same as comparing the Porsche with a nos injected piece of jap crap with a 2p interior. The beemer is still a well put together reliable non chavvy car that is unmodified.
You would have expected the Porsche to kill the humble 3 series beemer, it's not even a M car.
I'm beginning to wonder whether my diesel pipe and slippers 5 series would be faster than your tt around a track