what bhp have you got out of your standerd block??
Every tuner and impreza mechanic will say a different figure, please state what car and bhp.
Wrx uk300 358 bhp. |
2005 STI type UK
450bhp |
newage sti internals, version 3 sti heads 522.5bhp
|
Banny, wow. What do u think I can push my wrx to?
|
Originally Posted by rosssti
(Post 9702994)
Banny, wow. What do u think I can push my wrx to?
SOZ ! dunx P.S. 400+ V7 STI bolt-on mods only. |
I'm at 358 as it is, so if I get an sti block in there I can get a lot more?
|
Originally Posted by dunx
(Post 9703032)
You can push it to a garage when it blows up at 350+...
SOZ ! dunx |
98sti standard block and internals and heads and box
410 bhp on 25%meth map. |
553 on a standard engine and standard heads, more important though is 60-100 in 3.8s 70-100 in 2.9s 1440kilos uk 6spead
|
my94 sti wagon, only bolt on mods at the moment, and simtec ecu but somewhere in the region of 340bhp
|
standard 2.5ltr 450bhp
|
Originally Posted by stealthy55
(Post 9703244)
553 on a standard engine and standard heads, more important though is 60-100 in 3.8s 70-100 in 2.9s 1440kilos uk 6spead
|
Coops blew his WRX up at around 340 bhp, leg out of bed job...
dunx |
Originally Posted by StudentScooby
(Post 9703365)
standard 2.5ltr 450bhp
IMHO. dunx |
"standerd block"
LOL is that a nerd block? |
Originally Posted by stealthy55
(Post 9703244)
553 on a standard engine and standard heads, more important though is 60-100 in 3.8s 70-100 in 2.9s 1440kilos uk 6spead
:wonder: OP i dont know if there is a misunderstanding here but are you talking about the bare block it self or the actual internals on the WRX? You can drop a STi 7 or 8 short motor in however you will have to use the WRX heads & i believe they dont perform well as the AVCS you get on the STi newage. It all depends on what your goals are at the end of the day. |
Originally Posted by Aladdin
(Post 9703748)
Are you the one who posted a while back on a thread, cant remeber which one but you mentioned using the car on regular track days & you use E85?
:wonder: |
Originally Posted by stealthy55
(Post 9703776)
did run e85 but car never went on track, now running meth, bhp is lower ( or more realistic) and the "times" are from the meth map
|
Originally Posted by Aladdin
(Post 9703795)
Those are nice figures btw. If you dont me asking how long have you run that sort of power & who do you use for mapping?
|
Thats sick! Were there any advisory's given in regards to standard motor taking that much power by Paul? What sort of power did you run just on pump fuel & what is the spool up saying on the V?
|
Originally Posted by Aladdin
(Post 9703837)
Thats sick! Were there any advisory's given in regards to standard motor taking that much power by Paul? What sort of power did you run just on pump fuel & what is the spool up saying on the V?
|
Originally Posted by stealthy55
(Post 9703863)
somebody said to me " if its gonna blow it will blow on pauls rollers while being mapped" it had a very hard workout on his rollers on 2 seperate occasions but thankfully it didnt:) on vpower it was high 400, spool up is laggy but thats what im used to
According to a few sources i have come across some turbos that can make 'near' to stock spool up & over 400. Such as the FP turbos used on Evo's. Never the less they do have there weak points according to a few people. What sort of boost do you make by 3500 rpm? Some ruthless stuff though :king: |
The problem with a WRX newage is the gearboxs tend to only last upto and around the 350bhp mark hence why alot then go for an sti box.
|
Originally Posted by stealthy55
(Post 9703863)
somebody said to me " if its gonna blow it will blow on pauls rollers while being mapped" it had a very hard workout on his rollers on 2 seperate occasions but thankfully it didnt:) on vpower it was high 400, spool up is laggy but thats what im used to
JP |
Originally Posted by JP4
(Post 9704006)
That's the last thing you'll be worried about hey Rob! ;)
JP |
Originally Posted by stealthy55
(Post 9703816)
been running this power 500+ for a year now, 553 was on a dd roller, same spec it made 526 on pauls rollers, after he remapped it, it made 538 all on e85cant remember what it made on meth though it was over 500, dave rowe mapped it to 553 paul mapped it to the other figures, its on a md321v with motec ecu on a 2.0 newage
whats the full spec? any project thread? cheers eddy |
Originally Posted by eggy790
(Post 9704028)
lol thats the spec im going to be running soon! 321v 2.0 bugeye engine and syvecs ecu with some methanol :D
whats the full spec? any project thread? cheers eddy |
So are we saying that a standard newage STI 2.0 block and standard AVCS heads with the right supporting mods can take upto 500bhp and be reliable at that, and still hack some vigorous ocasional RR's!!! jesus christ. Also the standard 6 speed box is also comfortable at that level too?
What sort of torque are these 500bhp motor pushing? Rob PS, I think the OP's UK300 is on borrowed time, I stripped my 5 speed tranny with slightly less bhp, and around 320lbft!! |
Originally Posted by eggy790
(Post 9704028)
lol thats the spec im going to be running soon! 321v 2.0 bugeye engine and syvecs ecu with some methanol :D
whats the full spec? any project thread? cheers eddy |
Originally Posted by UK300 PRODRIVE
(Post 9704065)
So are we saying that a standard newage STI 2.0 block and standard AVCS heads with the right supporting mods can take upto 500bhp and be reliable at that, and still hack some vigorous ocasional RR's!!! jesus christ. Also the standard 6 speed box is also comfortable at that level too?
What sort of torque are these 500bhp motor pushing? Rob PS, I think the OP's UK300 is on borrowed time, I stripped my 5 speed tranny with slightly less bhp, and around 320lbft!! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands