Pulsar GTiR For Sale
1993 K-reg Nissan Pulsar GTiR
MOT until Nov 2005 Tax til March 2005 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...lsarFrontB.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...ulsarRearB.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...EngineBayB.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...rInteriorB.jpg Please Note : Steering Wheel & Gear K nob not included in sale. 2.0 litre Turbo 4 wheel drive Imported October 2003 Black Electric windows/mirrors Climate control aircon 68k miles Serviced every 4500 miles & maintained regardless of cost Cat 1 alarm/immobiliser 7x15" O.Z. Superturismo's (white) Yokohama A539's (6mm minimum tread) Helix Organic clutch (4000 miles old) Mongoose exhaust (2.5" decat system with 4" tailpipe) FET Turbo Timer A'pexi AVC-R K&N induction kit Forge Oil Separator Denso Iridium plugs Magnecor KV85 competition leads Nismo Strut Braces GAB adjustable suspension Powerflex bushes (front) Whiteline castor kit Walbro 255lph fuel pump Hi-Spec 285mm big brake conversion (grooved) Mintex 1144 pads Steve Pudney clutch pedal strengthening bracket Optional Alpine head unit/cd changer/sub/amp Estimated 310bhp/270lbft. 1/4 mile 12.6s @ 107mph 60ft in 1.55s Selling due to new house purchase £5500 ono Please PM me with SERIOUS offers only. Steve |
It's got to go as I have a nice new car waiting for me now...and also another house :Whatever_
I'm open to offers...:norty: BTTT Cheers Steve |
amm...how is the buyer spose to drive the car away without a steering wheel... :D
|
with them mods you put down ........no way is it 310bhp have you got forge pistons ?
|
PMSL at Sam
:D :D :D :D :D |
Originally Posted by SamUK
amm...how is the buyer spose to drive the car away without a steering wheel... :D
Expulsar - I was at the gtir rr day at Star Performance before Xmas, another Pulsar which has a very similar spec to mine (with standard internals), and has done a best of 12.9s on the 1/4 had 306bhp/268lbft. Maybe you disagree, what figures would you reckon allow a GTiR to run consistently below 13s on the strip? Cheers Steve |
This car is really very clean, its not another Pulsar thats just wound the boost up.
Its got the supporting mods to keep everything reliable and safe. Cheers, Grant |
You never know it may have put people off, no wheel...:D
Up for ya... :) |
Originally Posted by SamUK
You never know it may have put people off, no wheel...:D
Up for ya... :) :thumb: Steve |
Bump bttt
|
That looks very tidy indeed, always had a soft spot for these, you rareley see them, they look mint in the flesh, and good man for not b@stardising it http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/images/icons/icon14.gif.
has it got the umbrella? If I had a garage to put it in, I would be round at yours tommorrow with 5K, and would not leave untill you took it :D good luck anyway, nice motor :) |
Fancy sending me the reg via private mesasage mate please? Ins quote..
|
Originally Posted by RS Grant
This car is really very clean, its not another Pulsar thats just wound the boost up.
|
Originally Posted by sti monster
how whats wrong with that!! after all pulsars had the boost turned so far down as standard the turbo hardly spooled up at all. they were detuned for the road, the rally versions used the same engine, internals and turbo but the boost was set up higher. all pulsars should have the boost turned up to 1 bar, they are overfuelled as it is. i reckon at the spec your pulsar should easy kick out 310 - 320bhp, its all a question of boost. the t28 will spool up to 380bhp. the aussies have had a standard pulsar up past 400 bhp just by increasing the fuelling and the boost. and it should also be noted the gearbox is standard as well.
The post was a joke right :Whatever_ BBT for a clean looking GTi-R Tony. |
MJ >> Cheers mate - no brollie, it's too late in the production - they were only on the earlier cars. It has a vent where the brollie holder was on the early models.
AlanPPP >> Sorry mate, you know the reason as to why everybody photoshops numberplates (not that I don't trust you...), but you should be able to get a quote without a plate, just say you don't know and they should carry on with the process. Sti monster >> You could say that any of the 4wd/turbo road cars have been de-tuned from their rally spec - they'd not last 1000 miles if running rally car boost levels - forged pistons or not. I oubt very much that a t28 would support 380bhp for very long, even in gt28rs guise, that'd definitely be pushing it pretty hard, it just doesn't flow enough. The gearbox may be ok with 400bhp, but it'd never handle much abuse (read as track driving/drag racing), would need to be nurtured very carefully. Tone Loc >> The gearbox on these is reasonably strong if treated properly (as with all 4wd cars), but tend to break if a paddle clutch is fitted. You can run pretty high horsepower figures on standard internals, as long as the fuelling is properly mapped, even the standard top mount intercooler flows well, although badly positioned, can still support 350-380bhp. Also, good point about fuelling, standard injectors are 444cc so will need to be changed before 350hp, mine has a new upgraded fuel pump, and the MAF needs to go up to an 80mm model after 320hp... Anyway, my car's for sale, although I'm glad it's sparked this little debate, you may want to start another thread to discuss the subject :thumb: Cheers Steve |
Originally Posted by Tone Loc
LOL... never heard so much crap. Especially the standard gearbox bit. Are you serious. The gearbox struggles at not much over standard....4 th went on my friends (UK model) and has since fitted a Quaife. The power figures are ridiculous too, having invested in HKS cams/Apexi PFC/Induction/Exhaust etc the car tipped just over 290 @1.2bar. You think just by turning up the boost you'll gte over 300bhp. And the comment on the turbo.... have you seen the compressor map. Believe me the standard turbo is considered small and will NOT flow enough air for 380bhp, and the engine internals (especially pistons will be crying at this point too). The group A rally car most definately didn't run standard internals :freak3: . 400bhp just by turning up the boost and fueling (standard injectors can't cope with fueling 400bhp btw)...... you really do make me laugh.
The post was a joke right :Whatever_ BBT for a clean looking GTi-R Tony. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...day1212003.jpg |
Originally Posted by Tone Loc
LOL... never heard so much crap. Especially the standard gearbox bit. Are you serious. The gearbox struggles at not much over standard....4 th went on my friends (UK model) and has since fitted a Quaife. The power figures are ridiculous too, having invested in HKS cams/Apexi PFC/Induction/Exhaust etc the car tipped just over 290 @1.2bar. You think just by turning up the boost you'll gte over 300bhp. And the comment on the turbo.... have you seen the compressor map. Believe me the standard turbo is considered small and will NOT flow enough air for 380bhp, and the engine internals (especially pistons will be crying at this point too). The group A rally car most definately didn't run standard internals :freak3: . 400bhp just by turning up the boost and fueling (standard injectors can't cope with fueling 400bhp btw)...... you really do make me laugh.
The post was a joke right :Whatever_ BBT for a clean looking GTi-R Tony. I'v owned 2 now and have had the one I have now for over 3 years, The car is running 311bhp and 304lb's of torque at 1.2 bar on a standard turbo as has been for over 2 years now. Also it has run 12.3 second pass at santapod with this spec as well. As for 400bhp on standard piston's it can and has been done matey, My mate has been running 1.6bar for over a year now with no problem at all. And if you try reading the SR forum you will see that the yanks are getting 500bhp out of standard pulsar motors with the right fueling, So please get your facts right fella before you start gobbing off on hear. As for gearbox's they can be a problem if they have been mistreated in the past, But the pulsar that ran a 11.3 pass at TOTB last year still has a standard box fitted, My car uses a Quaife box just to be safe, And the motor is now being rebuilt so I can run over 400bhp with out problems. rob |
PMSL :lol:
At the end of the day its only a Pulsar... |
Yeah, and luckily not as common as a Scooby!
As stated before u dont need forged pistons to run high boost, just correct fueling, and obviously when ppl say standard they dont mean air filter, exhaust and turbo as those are always replaced on any car, they are refering to crank rods and pistons. Likewise with the gearbox, get a proper rebuild with all bearings and will run fine as long as u dont abuse it. 90% of gearbox faliures are down to driver error, not mechanical. |
Originally Posted by SamUK
PMSL :lol:
At the end of the day its only a Pulsar... rob |
The guy is just trying to sell his car here, keep it on topic and take the 'discussion on BHP/reliability/original internals/fueling/whatever elsewhere!
|
:)
|
a smell shiiiiiiiiiiiiii*e.
a think theres a couple off scooby drivers posting here who have had there ass skelped a few too many times by pulsars! a think steve was talking about my car when he said about a similar spec "r" getting 306 bhp and i would say his is probably beating that a bit going on 1/4 mile times so for u to say his figures are way off i reckon its just sour grapes. you guys struggle to get decent power outputs from scoobies after chucking wheelbarrow loads of cash at them its not our fault if pulsars can be easily and SAFELY tuned for peanuts! i know a bit about scooby ownership because ive just sold my my01 wrx to get the pulsar because IMHO scoobies are not all there cracked up too be! some off u guys should listen to yourselves thinking your particular car is the dogs bollox................because after all it really is only a scooby!:D:D:D cheers jimmymc |
Wich you all the best with your new car.. :D
|
Originally Posted by SamUK
Wich you all the best with your new car.. :D
20k for 220bhp wrx :D i pity u guys ! ive still got loads of bits lying around from mine WHEN u need them gimme a shout! cheers jimmymc |
Originally Posted by ODIN
Do you really no a single thing about pulsar's dude, Because from what you'ev writen I would think not.
I'v owned 2 now and have had the one I have now for over 3 years, The car is running 311bhp and 304lb's of torque at 1.2 bar on a standard turbo as has been for over 2 years now. Also it has run 12.3 second pass at santapod with this spec as well. As for 400bhp on standard piston's it can and has been done matey, My mate has been running 1.6bar for over a year now with no problem at all. And if you try reading the SR forum you will see that the yanks are getting 500bhp out of standard pulsar motors with the right fueling, So please get your facts right fella before you start gobbing off on hear. As for gearbox's they can be a problem if they have been mistreated in the past, But the pulsar that ran a 11.3 pass at TOTB last year still has a standard box fitted, My car uses a Quaife box just to be safe, And the motor is now being rebuilt so I can run over 400bhp with out problems. rob As for the other point about scooby owners not liking Pulsars/Sunnys..... i for one think they are an brilliant car for the money. No questions. I do think that simialar money must be spent to achieve the same sort of power tho. Tony. |
Im running a 350bhp scooby on a 1998, low milleage....though personally would'nt buy a Pulsar, simpliy as they are old cars..and the saying is the older the car is the more problems you will have...
|
Originally Posted by SamUK
Im running a 350bhp scooby on a 1998, low milleage....though personally would'nt buy a Pulsar, simpliy as they are old cars..and the saying is the older the car is the more problems you will have...
Good luck with the sale. |
Well well well, it's turning into quite a feisty little debate here...:nono:
It wasn't my intention to start a 'my car's faster than yours' thread, or to quote any dubious power figures - the car had a rolling road run with standard boost, and only exhaust/intake mods and made 240bhp at pretty low revs (something like 5000rpm when the speed limiter cut in). So now that it is running 1bar, and has proven itself on track and the strip (yeah, I was comparing it to your car jimmymc :) ), it is aroun the power figures that I quoted. Anyway, rolling roads aren't the best way to gauge power imho, I'm not a 'peak power' kinda person - it's the way it's delivered that's important. (which is why i've just got a tdi ibiza cupra :notworthy ). Sti monster>> Yeah, I've known dave @ awd for about the last 5 years, between him and bruce spence raving on about them was probably why I ended up buying one, as it's a lot of performance for the money & quite affordable to run as a daily driver. And yes, Dave's car is a 450+bhp monster on standard internals (or so I believe!)...and I was there when your mate's car got the 336bhp run...impressive. I have to agree that with Pulsars being older cars you have to look out for things such as rubber bushes being knackered with age (as you would do on a '93 Impreza)...however, being an import, the bodywork hasn't had the exposure to salty roads that ANY '93 british car has had and is cleaner underneath than my MY2000 MR2 Roadster was when I had it. Also, you do have to spend a similar amount of money on upgrading parts as on a Scoob, but in general, the initial outlay for buying a Sunny/Pulsar will be lower....hence the price tag....somebody please buy it so I can take down my post & restore peace to the Scoobynet :rolleyes: :eek: Cheers Steve |
Good luck with the sale dude! The pulsar is a truly amazing car which is the reason why i have decided to keep mine
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:38 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands