ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   A slip of standards..... (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/352679-a-slip-of-standards.html)

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 08:58 AM

A slip of standards.....
 
From another thread I am asking the question.

Question :

Is England suffering a general slip/dropping of standards? Is there less respect and is the counrty becoming a worse place to live.....


(I'd do a poll but I haven't a clue how to.....someone could if you know how to??)

OllyK 13 August 2004 09:02 AM


Originally Posted by Senior_AP
From another thread I am asking the question.

Question :

Is England suffering a general slip/dropping of standards? Is there less respect and is the counrty becoming a worse place to live.....

(I'd do a poll but I haven't a clue how to.....someone could if you know how to??)

Slipping or changing?? They have certainly changed since I was a kid, and IMHO not for the better.

Try "Thread Tools" at the top???

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 09:06 AM


Originally Posted by OllyK
Slipping or changing?? They have certainly changed since I was a kid, and IMHO not for the better.

Try "Thread Tools" at the top???


All done. :)

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 09:29 AM

btt

OllyK 13 August 2004 09:33 AM

Quite a bit of voting, not much discussion, TBH think it is pretty much open and shut as for the most part it is down to personal perception

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 09:38 AM


Originally Posted by OllyK
Quite a bit of voting, not much discussion, TBH think it is pretty much open and shut as for the most part it is down to personal perception


The results say it all.

I can only assume that scoobynutta555 hasn't seen this yet. :)

OllyK 13 August 2004 09:53 AM

Could be, or maybe he thinks the same as you but just feels the need to put in a balancing viewpoint. I have been known to do that on occasion.

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by OllyK
Could be, or maybe he thinks the same as you but just feels the need to put in a balancing viewpoint. I have been known to do that on occasion.


Definately not. He meant what he said 100% !!

:D

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 12:06 PM

btt - I want loads of votes on this one please.

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 12:12 PM

. .

Jye 13 August 2004 12:19 PM

BTW AP, you keep saying England, Scotland is just as bad imo.

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by Jye
BTW AP, you keep saying England, Scotland is just as bad imo.



I couldn't comment, not been there. Wales always seemed nice to me hence why I'm not saying Britain.

Jye 13 August 2004 12:25 PM

Take it from me then ;)

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by Jye
Take it from me then ;)


I shall do. My mate stayed in Glasgow....the GORGOLS or something?? He works for P&O Cruises and was staying there for 3 months. Pretty wack apparently.

SiPie 13 August 2004 12:31 PM

The GORBALS

Classy area ;)

Senior_AP 13 August 2004 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by SiPie
The GORBALS

Classy area ;)

Thats the one. ;)

Bars on windows and stuff. Pure Heroin addict, Ewan Macgregor trainspotting peasant-ville.

Jye 13 August 2004 01:02 PM


Originally Posted by Senior_AP
I shall do. My mate stayed in Glasgow....the GORGOLS or something?? He works for P&O Cruises and was staying there for 3 months. Pretty wack apparently.

Yeah the Gorbals m8. tbo the Gorbals are not nearly as bad as it's reputation leads folk to believe. And in terms of regeneration Glasgow overall is actually performing pretty well, as well, if not better than many in the UK. l think it's up there with Manchester as one of the most successful cities in sorting out its scum and pox ridden housing schemes etc.

Easterhouse, Drumchapel and Castlemilk are still pretty wild but even they have been given a good lick and polish :) No if you want to see wack Glasgow at it's finest then you need to pay a visit to Calton, Brigton, Balornock, Denniston, Haghill or Garthamlock.

Parts of Paisley on the other hand have more violence and lowlife scum than Glasgow and every other town in Scotland put together. Feegie Park imo is one of the most crime ravaged desperate housing schemes on the planet, far worse than any in Glasgow. I wont even mention, Wishaw, Bellshill, Coatbridge, Barrhead etc etc etc.

Apart from a few of the major English city schemes in London etc and maybe a wee bit of Coventry, like the Bell Green or Woodend estates I'd still say the west coast of Scotland is a riot to live in, literally ;)

Did I mention Greenock? :D :D

tiggers 13 August 2004 04:34 PM

I don't think there is much doubt that standards have slipped, the real questions are why and what, if anything, can we do to reverse the situation?

Of course we don't need to debate this as SN has already given us the answer to both questions - 'It's all Blair's fault' and 'Vote them out' so that's that settled then :rolleyes:

OllyK 13 August 2004 04:55 PM


Originally Posted by tiggers
Of course we don't need to debate this as SN has already given us the answer to both questions - 'It's all Blair's fault' and 'Vote them out' so that's that settled then :rolleyes:

I think it is more an issue that Labour are in power and they don't seem to be doing much to improve things. If you are responsible for something and it deterioriates either through your actions or lack of them, maybe it is time to let somebody else have a go.

tiggers 13 August 2004 05:12 PM


Originally Posted by OllyK
I think it is more an issue that Labour are in power and they don't seem to be doing much to improve things. If you are responsible for something and it deterioriates either through your actions or lack of them, maybe it is time to let somebody else have a go.

OllyK,

Up to a point I agree with you, trouble is who? Earlier this week I spent some time on the Conservative party site as this is the party recommended by many of the SN NSR crowd who are so vocal on these threads.

I was unable to find any information on their proposed policies on law and order other than one consulation paper on youth crime which was so wishy washy it didn't really give me any idea of what their policy proposal actually was. Maybe I missed it, but if not how can I be expected to vote for a party whose policies I cannot even read to find out whether I agree with them or not.

tiggers.

OllyK 13 August 2004 05:18 PM


Originally Posted by tiggers
OllyK,

Up to a point I agree with you, trouble is who? Earlier this week I spent some time on the Conservative party site as this is the party recommended by many of the SN NSR crowd who are so vocal on these threads.

I was unable to find any information on their proposed policies on law and order other than one consulation paper on youth crime which was so wishy washy it didn't really give me any idea of what their policy proposal actually was. Maybe I missed it, but if not how can I be expected to vote for a party whose policies I cannot even read to find out whether I agree with them or not.

tiggers.

Note that I put "let somebody else have a go". I wasn't putting forward any suggestions as to who may do a better job :D

Getting rid of Blair and letting somebody else in Labour have a go wouldn't be a bad start, as long as it isn't the usual suspects such as Prescott, Livingstone or Blunkett.

tiggers 13 August 2004 05:25 PM


Originally Posted by OllyK
Note that I put "let somebody else have a go". I wasn't putting forward any suggestions as to who may do a better job :D

Getting rid of Blair and letting somebody else in Labour have a go wouldn't be a bad start, as long as it isn't the usual suspects such as Prescott, Livingstone or Blunkett.

Note too that I didn't accuse *you* of suggesting the Tories ;) Agree with you entirely on Prescott, Livingstone and Blunkett though.

Senior_AP 14 August 2004 09:33 AM

BTT

Zeolite 14 August 2004 11:47 AM

Just back from working in the US. It is the most corrupt place I have ever been. Money rules completely and unashamedly. The parts I was in North Dakota and Montana are safe and the people are friendly but the people who run the place are self-serving to a degree that would make Margaret Thatchers cabinet blush.

Senior_AP 14 August 2004 11:51 AM


Originally Posted by Zeolite
Just back from working in the US. It is the most corrupt place I have ever been. Money rules completely and unashamedly. The parts I was in North Dakota and Montana are safe and the people are friendly but the people who run the place are self-serving to a degree that would make Margaret Thatchers cabinet blush.


I won't disagree with that. On the whole, the US is a dump. Have's and have nots......like a developing country!!

After being in the US....then going to Canada the difference is amazing. I was in Toronto, the single most coolest place in the world (that I have so far been to). I've been to prettier/quiter/louder/cleaner etc but overall it is superb. I would certainly consider living there.

Better than this **** hole of a country anyway.

Leslie 14 August 2004 11:55 AM

What you say is right Senior AP. Standards have changed enormously in recent years. Many people now generally think only for themselves, and seem almost unaware that there is anyone else around even. They rush into doing something without a thought for how what they are up to may affect anyone else.

In past years people always had consideration for others before themselves even, and the plus side of that was that it was returned. Instead of the modern super competitive attitude where it seems necessary to have a constant fight to beat everyone else at everything, it is so much more relaxing to ease through life helping others and being helped yourself.

I am lucky to live in the West Country where a lot of that attitude still exists. It is so noticeable how it has disappeared upcountry however, especially when the holiday makers appear with their particularly rude and overbearing ways, and their highly unpleasant behaviour.

By the same token, you should never underestimate a person from the West Country. They may talk slow, but they think fast! :)

Les

Senior_AP 14 August 2004 12:02 PM


Originally Posted by Leslie
What you say is right Senior AP. Standards have changed enormously in recent years. Many people now generally think only for themselves, and seem almost unaware that there is anyone else around even. They rush into doing something without a thought for how what they are up to may affect anyone else.

In past years people always had consideration for others before themselves even, and the plus side of that was that it was returned. Instead of the modern super competitive attitude where it seems necessary to have a constant fight to beat everyone else at everything, it is so much more relaxing to ease through life helping others and being helped yourself.

I am lucky to live in the West Country where a lot of that attitude still exists. It is so noticeable how it has disappeared upcountry however, especially when the holiday makers appear with their particularly rude and overbearing ways, and their highly unpleasant behaviour.

By the same token, you should never underestimate a person from the West Country. They may talk slow, but they think fast! :)

Les


Talking slow allows one to think fast.... :D

The general attitude in England is an attitude of confrontation, back-stabbing (usually via two faced people and gossiping) and being a general arse. I'm at the point where I barely trust anyone as I worry they'll gossip about me behind my back - had first hand experience of that one believe me. Occasionally I find myself doing it and I have to smack myself around my head and say "no, rise above it". Just seems the arseholes seem to do better which infuriates me. People are like this and they often don't even realise it.

When I go to France (and I'm sure other cultured countries) people seem to have a general attitude of friendliness.

I'm not wearing rose tinted glasses when abroad but put it this way....many English leave to live abroad ; the only people that come to live here are immigrants. That says it all I think.

tiggers 15 August 2004 10:39 PM


Originally Posted by Senior_AP
I'm not wearing rose tinted glasses when abroad but put it this way....many English leave to live abroad ; the only people that come to live here are immigrants. That says it all I think.

Err ... by definition if they come to live here they're immigrants or do *you* mean something different by immigrants.

Or do you mean no one who emigrates from the UK ever comes back which is untrue anyway?

RB5 Paul 16 August 2004 12:43 AM


Originally Posted by senior_ap
When I go to France (and I'm sure other cultured countries)

cultured?? when i stayed in Nice a few years ago it was like a ghetto,graffiti everywhere,french chavs loitering and generally being french ;)
We were in a 5 star hotel as well,some poor bloke had to leave his brand new 360 modena parked outside,it was right in the middle of the roughest city i've ever had the misfortune to visit.
Short helicopter trip to monaco for the grand prix tho and it was a different story ;):D

Senior_AP 16 August 2004 08:11 AM


Originally Posted by tiggers
Err ... by definition if they come to live here they're immigrants or do *you* mean something different by immigrants.

Or do you mean no one who emigrates from the UK ever comes back which is untrue anyway?


Refugees I mean. Apologies.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands