S204
Hi all, anyone know the owner of the below car?
subaru S204 | eBay Looks like a great car and an interesting spec. MOT history is spot on with some interesting advisories......LOL. This is the type of car I would defo consider selling my super clean, low mileage Bugeye STI Prodrive Style for. Cheers, Phil |
The owner is on here, was posted a while ago if you search for S204.
|
1.7 bar on oem engine
|
Very surprised to read the humorous advisories on the mot, never seen anything like that before and I'm surprised it's allowed on such an important document.
Also slightly concerning as it suggests who ever has mot'd it is probably good mates with the car owner... and as a potential buyer I'd be a bit concerned about buying a car that has been put through multiple mot's by a ''friendly'' tester. |
Originally Posted by mike74
(Post 12107102)
Very surprised to read the humorous advisories on the mot, never seen anything like that before and I'm surprised it's allowed on such an important document.
Also slightly concerning as it suggests who ever has mot'd it is probably good mates with the car owner... and as a potential buyer I'd be a bit concerned about buying a car that has been put through multiple mot's by a ''friendly'' tester. |
Originally Posted by mike74
(Post 12107102)
Very surprised to read the humorous advisories on the mot, never seen anything like that before and I'm surprised it's allowed on such an important document.
Also slightly concerning as it suggests who ever has mot'd it is probably good mates with the car owner... and as a potential buyer I'd be a bit concerned about buying a car that has been put through multiple mot's by a ''friendly'' tester. |
There was a **** at work who put "Customer clearly likes cheese and pickle sandwiches" on my Passat MOT years ago as he found a wrapper in the passenger footwell. What an idiot.
Nice car, but I'd want a PDF or similar of all that service history - those photo's of MOT's and services etc are beyond shocking. Looks very fresh, so probably no need to be mindful of heavily salted Scottish roads. |
Originally Posted by Hawkeye D
(Post 12107106)
There was a **** at work who put "Customer clearly likes cheese and pickle sandwiches" on my Passat MOT years ago as he found a wrapper in the passenger footwell. What an idiot.
Nice car, but I'd want a PDF or similar of all that service history - those photo's of MOT's and services etc are beyond shocking. Looks very fresh, so probably no need to be mindful of heavily salted Scottish roads. |
Shame the S204 specific full pillow ball lateral arms have been removed in order to fit a normal ARB whose droplinks don't attach at the hub.
It should look like this https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...53670bbab2.jpg It says the standard ARBs are available though so I guess the OEM lateral arms (that are needed to fit the rear ARB) must be available as well. |
due to whiteline adjustable arb they had to swap arms,looks like arb stout mounts are whiteline to-way stronger than oem plus better droplinks,
You can fit pillowball bushes to those arms. Im sure on front is alk ,roll centre kit and arb from whiteline -way better setup than oem. |
Originally Posted by JdmSti2006
(Post 12107120)
due to whiteline adjustable arb they had to swap arms,looks like arb stout mounts are whiteline to-way stronger than oem plus better droplinks,
You can fit pillowball bushes to those arms. Im sure on front is alk ,roll centre kit and arb from whiteline -way better setup than oem. |
Originally Posted by JdmSti2006
(Post 12107120)
due to whiteline adjustable arb they had to swap arms,looks like arb stout mounts are whiteline to-way stronger than oem plus better droplinks,
You can fit pillowball bushes to those arms. Im sure on front is alk ,roll centre kit and arb from whiteline -way better setup than oem. The full pillow ball arms are superior and are one of the reasons S204 feels so 'fluid' on the road. Non S204 lateral STi lateral arms exist which are triple pillow ball (the outer bush of the rear arm is a normal rubber one). Unless someone plans to constantly track it (and even that is a debatable reason IMHO), I don't see why anyone would buy a fantastic allround car made with special parts by STi and remove them to replace with aftermarket items. |
Some great comments guys and I have to agree about the Whiteline stuff.
I have all the STI parts fitted to my Bugeye STI and they are a brilliant set up. In all honesty I think an S204 needs to be completely std to be really appreciated. |
Originally Posted by fpan
(Post 12107125)
With an aftermarket ARB the only way to fit droplinks are to downgrade to normal STi arms.
The full pillow ball arms are superior and are one of the reasons S204 feels so 'fluid' on the road. Non S204 lateral STi lateral arms exist which are triple pillow ball (the outer bush of the rear arm is a normal rubber one). Unless someone plans to constantly track it (and even that is a debatable reason IMHO), I don't see why anyone would buy a fantastic allround car made with special parts by STi and remove them to replace with aftermarket items. |
Originally Posted by hedgecutter
(Post 12107124)
Way better until it rusts after 3 months, and the droplinks seize. When will people realise that Whiteline parts are downgrades.
|
Both hedgecutter and myself speak from experience about the WL products.
I had WL ARBs fitted in my WRX wagon and after a winter they looked like they came from the bottom of the ocean despite weekly underbody washes of the car. I guess we'll agree to disagree on which are the better products, the specially made S204 items or the WL ones. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands