ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   ScoobyNet General (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/)
-   -   What 1/4 times are you getting in your newage? (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/1030111-what-1-4-times-are-you-getting-in-your-newage.html)

Billet 28 September 2015 03:17 PM

What 1/4 times are you getting in your newage?
 
So took my car to the strip for the first time ever (for me and my car) and had 4 runs. Bogged down on 2 runs, on one run it jumped out of gear as i went to launch it so only had 1 clean run. Running 605 bhp on a 2.1 with stock heads, Ad08 tyres. Car is full weight and i weigh 19 stones my self. Had about 3/4 tank full of fuel and ran a 11.5. That was running 32psi in each tyre

Just wanted to know what kind of times other people are getting with similar power and newage only. I'm hoping theres more time in it with dropping tyre pressure and lower fuel levels etc. Also it was quite a hot day so obviously that doesnt help.

So yeah what are you guys running in your newages and what times are you getting???

Thanks in advance

RS_Matt 28 September 2015 03:23 PM

What year is your car Billet, I'll add you to the list.

https://www.scoobynet.com/driving-dy...l#post11561790

Billet 28 September 2015 03:30 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11742559)
What year is your car Billet, I'll add you to the list.

https://www.scoobynet.com/driving-dy...l#post11561790

2007

bustaMOVEs 28 September 2015 09:49 PM

I seen high 10s with just over 500hp. You need a classic not a lard ass newage :).
Long way to go for your 10 second build

RS_Matt 28 September 2015 10:08 PM

Asking a lot for a 500bhp 10 second Newage STI. Would have to be stripped to buggery with launch control, anti-lag etc etc.

Billet 28 September 2015 11:19 PM


Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs (Post 11742808)
I seen high 10s with just over 500hp. You need a classic not a lard ass newage :).
Long way to go for your 10 second build

This engine was planned as a stop gap, original plan is 2.35 race heads 35r to achieve the 10 second run.

Billet 28 September 2015 11:25 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11742826)
Asking a lot for a 500bhp 10 second Newage STI. Would have to be stripped to buggery with launch control, anti-lag etc etc.

As mentioned above looking to achieve the 10 second run with a 2.35. Also on first post i said this setup is 605bhp not 500.

TypeR99 29 September 2015 12:18 AM

interesting reading.

Wondering what power would be needed in a classic to achieve an 11.5?

Ive never done a 1/4 mile run but would like to. Only comparison I have is a friends 360bhp 6 speed 4 door classic did a 12.3 on a hot day at jap finale a few years ago but thats all I have to go on.

Scooby_Lee101 29 September 2015 03:21 AM

12.70 @ 105 mph. Blob eye 53 plate with 328 bhp dynod @ SRR.
Looking to get another date in October with my new turbo fitted. Hopefully a low 12. Dynod @ 371bhp

RS_Matt 29 September 2015 09:11 AM


Originally Posted by Billet (Post 11742852)
As mentioned above looking to achieve the 10 second run with a 2.35. Also on first post i said this setup is 605bhp not 500.

That was my reply to Buster's claim, not your time. Your time seems about right for a lardy STI with that stupidly anti-drag racing heavy power robbing gearbox.

RS_Matt 29 September 2015 09:12 AM


Originally Posted by Scooby_Lee101 (Post 11742876)
12.70 @ 105 mph. Blob eye 53 plate with 328 bhp dynod @ SRR.
Looking to get another date in October with my new turbo fitted. Hopefully a low 12. Dynod @ 371bhp

STI or WRX?

I'd be shocked if a Newage STI could pull a 12.7 with just 328!!!!


Originally Posted by TypeR99 (Post 11742864)
interesting reading.

Wondering what power would be needed in a classic to achieve an 11.5?

About 370bhp.

tan v5sti 29 September 2015 09:49 AM

qtr mile
 
Theres a list on here of qtr mile times members have had..check its interesting and a good guide

cookstar 29 September 2015 10:55 AM

My stupid power robbing six speed took me to 10.9 with 518 BHP.

Classic though 😉

RS_Matt 29 September 2015 01:29 PM


Originally Posted by cookstar (Post 11742954)
My stupid power robbing six speed took me to 10.9 with 518 BHP.

Classic though 😉

In your 1999 Turbo 2000?

IainMilford 29 September 2015 03:44 PM


Originally Posted by Billet (Post 11742555)
So took my car to the strip for the first time ever (for me and my car) and had 4 runs. Bogged down on 2 runs, on one run it jumped out of gear as i went to launch it so only had 1 clean run. Running 605 bhp on a 2.1 with stock heads, Ad08 tyres. Car is full weight and i weigh 19 stones my self. Had about 3/4 tank full of fuel and ran a 11.5. That was running 32psi in each tyre

Just wanted to know what kind of times other people are getting with similar power and newage only. I'm hoping theres more time in it with dropping tyre pressure and lower fuel levels etc. Also it was quite a hot day so obviously that doesnt help.

So yeah what are you guys running in your newages and what times are you getting???

Thanks in advance

I ran an 11.2 in my Newage WRX earlier this year, that's 660bhp, on road tyres, and not a particularly decent surface, would reckon there's a 10 in there with decent tyres/better surface/more practice

cookstar 29 September 2015 04:17 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11743022)
In your 1999 Turbo 2000?


Yeah.

Trinity 29 September 2015 04:36 PM

I think RS_**** paid Billet to start a thread like this, he hasnt been around much lately with his 10 sec Golf Diesel WRX mashup

Scooby_Lee101 29 September 2015 05:40 PM

RS Matt my car is a STI
Why the shock that particular day I ran 5 times slowest time of the day was a 12.96 fastest obviously a 12.70, the run pre that was a 12.71. So not a fluke.
Its not just all about power, tyres, suspension, driver are factors that should be considered, plus I have been drag racing for nearly 25 years, so I have a rough idea how to drag race.

Trinity 29 September 2015 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by Scooby_Lee101 (Post 11743136)
RS Matt my car is a STI
Why the shock that particular day I ran 5 times slowest time of the day was a 12.96 fastest obviously a 12.70, the run pre that was a 12.71. So not a fluke.
Its not just all about power, tyres, suspension, driver are factors that should be considered, plus I have been drag racing for nearly 25 years, so I have a rough idea how to drag race.

Matt says his wife can beat you in her Diesel Golf. True Story.

RS_Matt 29 September 2015 07:32 PM


Originally Posted by Trinity (Post 11743145)
Matt says his wife can beat you in her Diesel Golf. True Story.

He's got a 2003 STI, the 2004 STI must be a lemon.

RS_Matt 29 September 2015 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by Scooby_Lee101 (Post 11743136)
RS Matt my car is a STI
Why the shock that particular day I ran 5 times slowest time of the day was a 12.96 fastest obviously a 12.70, the run pre that was a 12.71. So not a fluke.
Its not just all about power, tyres, suspension, driver are factors that should be considered, plus I have been drag racing for nearly 25 years, so I have a rough idea how to drag race.

How much weight saving have you done so far? Do you have anti-lag and launch control? Big torque figure?

RS_Matt 29 September 2015 07:50 PM


Originally Posted by cookstar (Post 11743096)
Yeah.

Do you know the terminal?

125?

RS_Matt 29 September 2015 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by IainMilford (Post 11743080)
I ran an 11.2 in my Newage WRX earlier this year, that's 660bhp, on road tyres, and not a particularly decent surface, would reckon there's a 10 in there with decent tyres/better surface/more practice

Is that one of the quickest Newage WRX times you know of?

Taking shape now, quite a good reference point emerging.

1.) ET 7.74 @179.2 - Andy.F 1994 STI 1200/**** -http://youtu.be/Dif2BTi_yEE
2.) ET 8.66 @157.9 - SMG 2000 STI RA ***/*** -http://youtu.be/44VzgmFqQm4
3.) ET 8.83 @160.2 - mikeesingh SC DRAG CAR 690/*** -http://youtu.be/xkC7Yv1SQr8
4.) ET 8.95 @168 - Lateral Performance 1999 STI 810/650 -http://youtu.be/o3RWBWNwdl8
5.) ET 9.36 @151 - Mad Hammer 1998 STI RA 728/*** -http://youtu.be/LbVcYMHroa0
6.) ET 9.63 @154 - Pavlo 1995 STI RA 7**/*** -http://youtu.be/_noGmFFAxy8
7.) ET 9.82 @137.0 - Jolly Green Monster 1997 STI TR 920/*** -http://youtu.be/jviiKVNkjmA
8.) ET 10.06 @157 - MartynJ 1999 WRX 707/*** -http://youtu.be/uu-xkpsBNPo
9.) ET 10.6 @136 - JP4 2004 STI WR1 711/610 -http://youtu.be/i-u_VgOLvEM
10.) ET 10.73 @135.1 - P1Marty 2000 P1 690/*** -http://youtu.be/CmqGvmXcR_4
11.) ET 10.75 @130.8 - bigarf 2004 STI 709/*** -http://youtu.be/HHDJZm8xkaU - (new owner 10.74)
12.) ET 10.80 @123 - banny sti STI TR 580/*** -http://youtu.be/KTenAr4Xgec
13.) ET 10.89 @131 - scubbay 1997 STI TR 500/*** -http://youtu.be/uxtrQdzwYBk
14.) ET 10.90 @129 - dazdavies 1997 STI TR 520/***
15.) ET 10.9 @12* - cookstar 1999 T2000 518/*** -http://youtu.be/tLzmnfaihiw
16.) ET 11.14 @128 - mikeesingh 1998 STI TR 466/***
17.) ET 11.29 @116 - Dougwrx 1994 STI 444/450
18.) ET 11.2 @*** - IainMilford 2005 WRX 660/***
19.) ET 11.34 @124 - JGlanzaV 1996 WRX 517/*** -http://youtu.be/riv1s8v5sBA
20.) ET 11.4 @126 - Anger 1999 WRX RA 457/411
21.) ET 11.57 @116.4 - rooferman 1999 STI RA 369/340
22.) ET 11.5 @124 - H4RDY-P1 2003 STI 500/***
23.) ET 11.5 @*** Billet 2007 STI 605/***
24.) ET 11.73 @119 - Aztec Performance Ltd 1999 T2000 340/340 -http://youtu.be/btaXzEuo0Vs
25.) ET 11.7 @11* - cookstar 199* T2000 431/*** -http://youtu.be/tLzmnfaihiw
26.) ET 11.83 @117.4 - jura11 2002 WRX 490/*** -http://youtu.be/kgWyOdRP-Ko
27.) ET 11.88@115 - Scoobyman Neil 1999 STI 390/***
28.) ET 11.9 @1** - Dave-W- 2005 STI 474/500
29.) ET 12.12 @113.6 - ScoobyDoo69 2004 STI 370/360 -http://youtu.be/UliHkXPZ24E
30.) ET 12.29 @115.7 - rajscoob 1997 WRX 352/340 -http://youtu.be/6kD3sy2ChNA
31.) ET 12.29 @110.6 - Ian 2002 STI JDM 380/335
32.) ET 12.46 @105 - mickywrx 1994 WRX 330/289 -http://youtu.be/JVNaNHNal1U
33.) ET 12.65 @1** - T5NYW 2006 STI T20 JDM 350/***
34.) ET 12.68 @104.3 - RS_Matt 2003 WRX 333/307 -http://youtu.be/9eMrwZDpwSg
35.) ET 12.70 @105 - Scooby_Lee101 2003 STI 328/***
36.) ET 12.74 @106 - chieftain333 1996 STI 302/***
37.) ET 12.77 @109.2 - banny sti 1999 STI 325/***
38.) ET 12.8 @106 - ac1867 1999 T2000 330/330
39.) ET 12.8 @10* - fat-thomas 2004 STI 430/***
40.) ET 13.0 @10* - sbushby 1999 STI RA 306/***
41.) ET 13.0 @*** ScoobyMark2005 STI 369/***
42.) ET 13.18 @103 boosted 2003 WRX 353/346
43.) ET 13.1 @108 - lord shaun 83 1999 WRX ***/***
44.) ET 13.1 @104 - R4LLY 1995 STI RA 276/253
45.) ET 13.7 @1** - scoobiepaul 2002 STI JDM 295/***
46.) ET 14.2 @*** - slimwiltaz 2002 WRX 267/***

Scooby_Lee101 29 September 2015 09:02 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11743213)
How much weight saving have you done so far? Do you have anti-lag and launch control? Big torque figure?

Space saver wheel removed, plus a few other bits that were in the boot.

I have LC yes, torque figure was 330 lb torque @ circa 4k revs

Obviously im looking to improve on that time since having my SC38 mapped.

Im going to Santa Pod on the 24th October, hopefully should be able to break a mid to low 12 if the conditions are right.

Next year a few more choice mods to add to the car, to achieve circa 420-450bhp depending what jets i use for the NOS ;)

IainMilford 29 September 2015 09:06 PM


Originally Posted by RS_Matt (Post 11743223)
Is that one of the quickest Newage WRX times you know of?

Taking shape now, quite a good reference point emerging.

1.) ET 7.74 @179.2 - Andy.F 1994 STI 1200/**** -http://youtu.be/Dif2BTi_yEE
2.) ET 8.66 @157.9 - SMG 2000 STI RA ***/*** -http://youtu.be/44VzgmFqQm4
3.) ET 8.83 @160.2 - mikeesingh SC DRAG CAR 690/*** -http://youtu.be/xkC7Yv1SQr8
4.) ET 8.95 @168 - Lateral Performance 1999 STI 810/650 -http://youtu.be/o3RWBWNwdl8
5.) ET 9.36 @151 - Mad Hammer 1998 STI RA 728/*** -http://youtu.be/LbVcYMHroa0
6.) ET 9.63 @154 - Pavlo 1995 STI RA 7**/*** -http://youtu.be/_noGmFFAxy8
7.) ET 9.82 @137.0 - Jolly Green Monster 1997 STI TR 920/*** -http://youtu.be/jviiKVNkjmA
8.) ET 10.06 @157 - MartynJ 1999 WRX 707/*** -http://youtu.be/uu-xkpsBNPo
9.) ET 10.6 @136 - JP4 2004 STI WR1 711/610 -http://youtu.be/i-u_VgOLvEM
10.) ET 10.73 @135.1 - P1Marty 2000 P1 690/*** -http://youtu.be/CmqGvmXcR_4
11.) ET 10.75 @130.8 - bigarf 2004 STI 709/*** -http://youtu.be/HHDJZm8xkaU - (new owner 10.74)
12.) ET 10.80 @123 - banny sti STI TR 580/*** -http://youtu.be/KTenAr4Xgec
13.) ET 10.89 @131 - scubbay 1997 STI TR 500/*** -http://youtu.be/uxtrQdzwYBk
14.) ET 10.90 @129 - dazdavies 1997 STI TR 520/***
15.) ET 10.9 @12* - cookstar 1999 T2000 518/*** -http://youtu.be/tLzmnfaihiw
16.) ET 11.14 @128 - mikeesingh 1998 STI TR 466/***
17.) ET 11.29 @116 - Dougwrx 1994 STI 444/450
18.) ET 11.2 @*** - IainMilford 2005 WRX 660/***
19.) ET 11.34 @124 - JGlanzaV 1996 WRX 517/*** -http://youtu.be/riv1s8v5sBA
20.) ET 11.4 @126 - Anger 1999 WRX RA 457/411
21.) ET 11.57 @116.4 - rooferman 1999 STI RA 369/340
22.) ET 11.5 @124 - H4RDY-P1 2003 STI 500/***
23.) ET 11.5 @*** Billet 2007 STI 605/***
24.) ET 11.73 @119 - Aztec Performance Ltd 1999 T2000 340/340 -http://youtu.be/btaXzEuo0Vs
25.) ET 11.7 @11* - cookstar 199* T2000 431/*** -http://youtu.be/tLzmnfaihiw
26.) ET 11.83 @117.4 - jura11 2002 WRX 490/*** -http://youtu.be/kgWyOdRP-Ko
27.) ET 11.88@115 - Scoobyman Neil 1999 STI 390/***
28.) ET 11.9 @1** - Dave-W- 2005 STI 474/500
29.) ET 12.12 @113.6 - ScoobyDoo69 2004 STI 370/360 -http://youtu.be/UliHkXPZ24E
30.) ET 12.29 @115.7 - rajscoob 1997 WRX 352/340 -http://youtu.be/6kD3sy2ChNA
31.) ET 12.29 @110.6 - Ian 2002 STI JDM 380/335
32.) ET 12.46 @105 - mickywrx 1994 WRX 330/289 -http://youtu.be/JVNaNHNal1U
33.) ET 12.65 @1** - T5NYW 2006 STI T20 JDM 350/***
34.) ET 12.68 @104.3 - RS_Matt 2003 WRX 333/307 -http://youtu.be/9eMrwZDpwSg
35.) ET 12.70 @105 - Scooby_Lee101 2003 STI 328/***
36.) ET 12.74 @106 - chieftain333 1996 STI 302/***
37.) ET 12.77 @109.2 - banny sti 1999 STI 325/***
38.) ET 12.8 @106 - ac1867 1999 T2000 330/330
39.) ET 12.8 @10* - fat-thomas 2004 STI 430/***
40.) ET 13.0 @10* - sbushby 1999 STI RA 306/***
41.) ET 13.0 @*** ScoobyMark2005 STI 369/***
42.) ET 13.18 @103 boosted 2003 WRX 353/346
43.) ET 13.1 @108 - lord shaun 83 1999 WRX ***/***
44.) ET 13.1 @104 - R4LLY 1995 STI RA 276/253
45.) ET 13.7 @1** - scoobiepaul 2002 STI JDM 295/***
46.) ET 14.2 @*** - slimwiltaz 2002 WRX 267/***

Im not going to be laying claims to it being the quickest WRX, there's always someone with a quicker one somewhere.

Extra info for your chart, it was an 11.27 @132 and its 660/570

RS_Matt 30 September 2015 09:39 AM


Originally Posted by IainMilford (Post 11743266)
Im not going to be laying claims to it being the quickest WRX, there's always someone with a quicker one somewhere.

Extra info for your chart, it was an 11.27 @132 and its 660/570

Cheers for info bud, most on here are a bit cloak and dagger at times!

Did you baby the launch Iain? There are cars posting far quicker times than yours with lower/similar terminals.

tan v5sti 30 September 2015 11:41 AM

1/4 p1
 
Matt for the chart..p1 330bhp 12.64 110mph

banny sti 30 September 2015 12:34 PM

My old car after the new owner had bought it and had it mapped again...


Shaun 30 September 2015 01:47 PM

Billet - what were your 60ft times?

H4RDY-P1 30 September 2015 02:50 PM

Pretty sure he told me 1.7sec 60 foot time shaun.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands