ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   Non Scooby Related (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/)
-   -   Abortion (https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby-related-4/1027389-abortion.html)

JTaylor 23 July 2015 01:29 PM


Originally Posted by DJ Dunk (Post 11714597)
Having spent 7 months in a NICU recently, I've seen babies born at 24 weeks. One couple that we got to know quite well now have their baby at home who is doing very well. Yes, they needed a lot of major medical intervention and had lots of subsequent issues, but those babies were very much more than a collection of developing cells. They were babies, human beings; strong enough to fight and continue their lives.

Sadly, we also experienced those for whom the fight was too much, but I'm left with no doubt in my mind that at 24 weeks they are very much viable, very much alive, very much a baby in the truest sense.

What are your thoughts on Devildog's assertion his "collection of cells" only develop a "sense of awareness or existence" "from the minute they are born" rather than in the womb? Is that your experience, Dunk? I was under the impression that unborn babies could react to music and other stimulae at a fairly early age.

DJ Dunk 23 July 2015 02:27 PM

In my experience (I'm not a medical practitioner, just someone who's experienced premature births) their sense of 'awareness' can be apparent from as little as 20 weeks, some may say sooner.

A sense of existence is a little more hard to define and I don't think bears any relevance to the subject, personally.

From what I've experienced, 24 weeks is a baby. Not every organ is fully prepared for life on the outside, but it's unquestionably an aware, living being.

Beef 23 July 2015 07:56 PM

Total support of abortion.

The right to self-determination and body autonomy of the mother must take precedence over all other factors.

24 weeks is a reasonable timeframe - 5 months is more than enough time to make up your mind.

markjmd 23 July 2015 09:54 PM


Originally Posted by Beef (Post 11714833)
Total support of abortion.

The right to self-determination and body autonomy of the mother must take precedence over all other factors.

24 weeks is a reasonable timeframe - 5 months is more than enough time to make up your mind.

If you think it's more than enough time, doesn't that mean you think the limit should be shorter?

c_maguire 24 July 2015 09:57 AM

Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?

neil-h 24 July 2015 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by c_maguire (Post 11715046)
Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?

Maybe most people (fortunately) aren't quite as callous as you are?

Dingdongler 24 July 2015 11:38 AM

Terminations for real medical reasons can take longer as some tests may come back as being inconclusive etc and need to be repeated or further specialist advice needed.

hodgy0_2 24 July 2015 12:30 PM

when my wife was pregnant with our 3rd and then 4/5 (twins), she was in her mid/later 30's

so we went privately to the "Fetal Medicine Centre" in London to have an early nuchal scan, (I think 8 odd weeks, may have been twelve)

http://www.fetalmedicine.com/nuchal-scan

you get the results in minutes

no test is 100% but we felt it was worth it

Lisawrx 24 July 2015 01:02 PM


Originally Posted by c_maguire (Post 11715046)
Allowing for 8 weeks to 'confirm' the pregnancy, what sort of person needs another 16 to settle on a termination?
It wouldn't be unreasonable to halve the current time, however more than 18 seems unjustifiable to me. Can people really be that indecisive, particularly as regards a decision of this type?

What happens to a woman that didn't know she was pregnant until quite far along?

c_maguire 24 July 2015 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by Dingdongler (Post 11715084)
Terminations for real medical reasons can take longer as some tests may come back as being inconclusive etc and need to be repeated or further specialist advice needed.

If the limit is reduced then extensions for the reasons you give should be allowed where appropriate to a cut-off point (which could be the current 24 weeks). Although I'd be interested to know whether there is any time-wasting going on that could be removed instead.


Originally Posted by Lisawrx (Post 11715129)
What happens to a woman that didn't know she was pregnant until quite far along?

8 weeks is 2 missed menstruations. How many do you need, three for luck? As for the daft bints starving themselves who have irregular cycles, perhaps they should routinely take pregnancy tests if active.

c_maguire 24 July 2015 01:44 PM


Originally Posted by neil-h (Post 11715079)
Maybe most people (fortunately) aren't quite as callous as you are?

I only wish I had your empathy, my life could be so much more involving/complicated/tiresome.

Lisawrx 24 July 2015 02:02 PM


Originally Posted by c_maguire (Post 11715140)
8 weeks is 2 missed menstruations. How many do you need, three for luck? As for the daft bints starving themselves who have irregular cycles, perhaps they should routinely take pregnancy tests if active.

There are various contraceptives which (can)stop periods, including the one I am on. I agree, we could all take regular pregnancy tests if active, but in reality, you just don't. Rightly or wrongly, you just assume the contraception will work, especially if it has been, long term so far.

Devildog 24 July 2015 04:18 PM


Originally Posted by Lisawrx (Post 11715148)
There are various contraceptives which (can)stop periods, including the one I am on. I agree, we could all take regular pregnancy tests if active, but in reality, you just don't. Rightly or wrongly, you just assume the contraception will work, especially if it has been, long term so far.



Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??

Lisawrx 24 July 2015 08:42 PM


Originally Posted by Devildog (Post 11715234)
Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??

Not saying it's common, but it has been known for people to go right through a pregnancy without knowing, until labour of course.

4/5 months, I would imagine would be very possible if the likes of morning sickness was absent. Not every woman puts on a lot of weight during pregnancy, so could be forgiven for just thinking they were just putting a little on, without considering being pregnant as the reason. Again, I'm not saying this is something common, I haven't got figures to support one way or another, but I do know people that have only found out they were pregnant quite far along, also one person who fell pregnant with both her children while using the implant as a form of contraceptive. Bodies are funny things.....

vindaloo 24 July 2015 09:28 PM


Originally Posted by Turbohot (Post 11713797)
I'm well aware of that, but it's only one or two blokes, and that's it!

It's not even that.... We keep it in box and pass it around on request. :)

Turbohot 24 July 2015 10:36 PM


Originally Posted by vindaloo (Post 11715364)
It's not even that.... We keep it in box and pass it around on request. :)

That's good to know. Please keep up with this good work, if you may. :)

Ooperbum 25 July 2015 01:42 AM


Originally Posted by Devildog (Post 11715234)
Lisa


are you telling me you wouldn't notice the physical changes of being, say, 4 or 5 months pregnant??

10 yeats ago a girl in our village gave birth. She didn't know she was pregnant until she went into labour. She was 14 at the time.

brendy76 25 July 2015 02:43 AM


Originally Posted by Ooperbum (Post 11715433)
10 yeats ago a girl in our village gave birth. She didn't know she was pregnant until she went into labour. She was 14 at the time.

Taking a wild stab in the dark here (and judging by your username), it wasnt you then? :lol1:

alcazar 13 February 2016 09:19 PM

How odd.

wrx300scooby 13 February 2016 10:46 PM


Originally Posted by alcazar (Post 11796305)
How odd.

Yorkshire, clearly:lol1:

neil-h 14 February 2016 11:37 AM

What on earth? :wonder:

Turbohot 14 February 2016 11:51 AM

I reckon a spam bumped this thread up yesterday, and then others commented on it from #109. Spam post must have been vaped. Or may be, alcazar mistakenly thought that it was the Police thread.

neil-h 14 February 2016 02:54 PM


Originally Posted by Turbohot (Post 11796446)
I reckon a spam bumped this thread up yesterday, and then others commented on it from #109. Spam post must have been vaped. Or may be, alcazar mistakenly thought that it was the Police thread.

Yeah that was my assumption, Alcazar doesn't strike me as the thread bumping type. :lol1:

Turbohot 14 February 2016 03:22 PM


Originally Posted by neil-h (Post 11796493)
Yeah that was my assumption, Alcazar doesn't strike me as the thread bumping type. :lol1:

Yes. But it's also possible that he did bump this thread up for no apparent reason and called his own act of doing so- "How odd." Something like talking/commenting on self, I mean.

Anything is possible, when it comes to Sir alcy :cool:, you know. I wouldn't be surprised. :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands