scoobyclinics turbo's just got billet I mean better!
7 Attachment(s)
The ultimate bolt-on turbo just got better! Introducing our new XT-R
turbo range, now with billet compressor wheels! Scoobyclinic have been working together with Blouch Performance Turbo over the past few months to improve on our already class leading turbos and are proud to announce our new, fully machined, billet, state-of-the-art, aerodynamic compressor wheels that out perform our existing trend setting turbos. These compressor wheels are stronger and 33% lighter than before and all test results indicate that these high efficiency wheels make more horsepower at less boost pressure than our current turbos. This translates into quicker spool while producing greater horsepower and torque - what more could you ask for! You will not find this cutting edge technology anywhere else. And if that wasn't enough, we have also developed an improved one piece exhaust housing that can be applied across the board to our existing turbo product line to reduce turbine inlet pressure (negative pressure differential) and increase peak horsepower. Initial results comparing the current SC50 to the new billet version have shown an increase of +35bhp and +45ft/lb with similar spool, even with a bigger turbine housing!! We are hoping to get some of our own dyno results up in the next few days from our Gaffer's 22B and our 2009 ScoobySprint winning race car. We will let our 2010 results with these turbos speak for themselves, like this year's did and the year before that! For a limited time only, the new range of billit turbos will be available for just £100 above our current turbo prices! Billit direct fit turbos available: Attachment 53174 Attachment 53175 Attachment 53176 Attachment 53177 Attachment 53178 Attachment 53179 SC46 XTR Billet.........£1400.00 new lower price = £1295! SC50 XTR Billet.........£1450.00 New lower price = £1350! SC54 XTR Billet.........£1495.00 New lower price = £1425! The XT-R billet wheels are also available for our rotated turbos: Attachment 53180 http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/v...c/garrett2.jpg GT30 XT-R Billet (upto 550bhp)..........£1125 GT33 XT-R Billet (upto 600bhp)..........£1250 GT35 XT-R Billet (upto 650bhp)..........£1195 Just to recap SC46 XTR Billet.........£1400.00 new lower price = £1295! SC50 XTR Billet.........£1450.00 New lower price = £1350! SC54 XTR Billet.........£1495.00 New lower price = £1425! all prices + vat Trade enquires welcome. cheers Ads:thumb: |
Hi,
today we press on fitting the new SC54 billet turbo, as you can see from the following pictures it genuinely is a direct fit, compressor outlet faces the right way, its on a standard up and down pipe and there is no need to remove lumps of block or bell housing to make it fit, in fact you can actually see on one of the photo's where part of the block and bell housing were removed years ago when this car (The Gaffers 22 B) was testing out the MD series of turbo's. One of the SC turbo design briefs was to avoid block or bell housing chopping to facilitate fitment. http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/v...P1010003-6.jpg http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/v...P1010007-9.jpg http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/v...P1010010-6.jpg Printouts to follow :thumb: |
3 Attachment(s)
Hi,
we decided to run our first back to back tests on the new SC billet range, the first victim was our scoobysprint and scoobyshoot winning car, the same car that took us to time attack victory in 2008. This morning we ran the car showing a healthy 540.8 bhp Attachment 53181 We simply swapped out the turbo for our new billet version shown here on the left Attachment 53182 We then ran the car again Attachment 53183 No adjustments were made this was a straight forward back to back test on the same day with same atmospheric conditions this gave us quicker spool, 46.8 bhp, 30 ftlbs of torque, all on pump gas, we expect to see 600 bhp from this once mapped, and I stress all on pump gas. Result :thumb: cheers Ads |
sweet as im coming for a chat deff
|
Pump gas as in E85?
590bhp from a GT30R? What size exhaust housing ? Still a 52lb min compressor wheel? What boost? Impressive performance but we need more info ;) |
Originally Posted by frayz
(Post 9039161)
Pump gas as in E85?
590bhp from a GT30R? What size exhaust housing ? Still a 52lb min compressor wheel? What boost? Impressive performance but we need more info ;) Hi, morrisons finest, and yes 590 bhp on a 30R with a 0.63 hot side :D Compressor wheel is custom made to our specs, its a billet wheel caperble of flowing 55 llbs of air and is 33% lighter than the original Garratt wheel. Boost wise it was running 1.9 bar, as soon as we get the time, possably tomorrow, we will map it to see where it max's out Hope the above helps cheers Ads |
Originally Posted by specialx
(Post 9039176)
Hi,
morrisons finest, and yes 590 bhp on a 30R with a 0.63 hot side :D Compressor wheel is custom made to our specs, its a billet wheel caperble of flowing 55 llbs of air and is 33% lighter than the original Garratt wheel. Boost wise it was running 1.9 bar, as soon as we get the time, possably tomorrow, we will map it to see where it max's out Hope the above helps cheers Ads |
So when you say Morrisons finest you are actually meaning E85 and not super unleaded
|
Morrisons finest is E85 mate ;)
.63 hotside is interesting? 1.9bar flat or is that at the redline? What did it run in the middle? Whats the spec of the motor, cc, headwork, avcs, cams, manifolds etc? |
Originally Posted by frayz
(Post 9039230)
Morrisons finest is E85 mate ;)
|
Agreed
|
Still no testing of the SC54 on a 2.0ltr?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by frayz
(Post 9039230)
Morrisons finest is E85 mate
.63 hotside is interesting? 1.9bar flat or is that at the redline? What did it run in the middle? Whats the spec of the motor, cc, headwork, avcs, cams, manifolds etc? Hi, I have printed the boost curve against the bhp for you to take a look at Attachment 53184 Spec is .......... 2.35 ltr using our stroker kit https://www.scoobynet.com/trader-ann...obyclinic.html Standard STI 8 heads Standard cams Solaris ecu GT 30R billet turbo E85 fuel Hope the above helps, Thanks for your interest. Cheers Kev |
Originally Posted by TH3_5T1G
(Post 9039970)
Still no testing of the SC54 on a 2.0ltr?
Hi, to be fair I think it would be very laggy and not worth doing, we are about to test the SC 46 Billet, which I feel will be a far better candidate for you, as soon as we have results we will post them up. Cheers Kev |
Great, thanks for the update :thumb:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Hi,
as promised yesterday ( Friday ) we have run our new SC 54 XTR billet turbo, fitted to our 22B. Result :D http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/v...pandtorque.jpg This is achieved on Shell V power, not race fuel just plain old pump gas :thumb: Boost and AFR showing power at the wheels. Attachment 53185 All this on a direct fit turbo, a true direct fit turbo, wonder what it will do on a 10% meth mix :idea: Up date coming soon. cheers Kev |
I know there isn't a exact answer but what % power increase would you expect with a 10% meth mix
|
Hi,
I hate to speculate but I expect we will see around 550 bhp, maybe 560 bhp thats done it now, just jinxed it ;) cheers Kev |
Cheers for the info Kev.
Ive a 3076R going on my build. Impressive power concidering its on stock heads and cams. |
Originally Posted by The Gaffer
(Post 9040474)
Hi,
as promised yesterday ( Friday ) we have run our new SC 54 XTR billet turbo, fitted to our 22B. Result :D http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/v...pandtorque.jpg This is achieved on Shell V power, not race fuel just plain old pump gas :thumb: Boost and AFR showing power at the wheels. http://i694.photobucket.com/albums/v...oostandAFR.jpg All this on a direct fit turbo, a true direct fit turbo, wonder what it will do on a 10% meth mix :idea: Up date coming soon. cheers Kev Purely out of interest I will pop the dyno correction figures shown on the graph onto our dyno on Monday to see the overall correction factor. It may be interesting to apply the same corrections to all our graphs in future :thumb:. |
Originally Posted by MartynJ
(Post 9040885)
Very nice figures guys.
Purely out of interest I will pop the dyno correction figures shown on the graph onto our dyno on Monday to see the overall correction factor. It may be interesting to apply the same corrections to all our graphs in future :thumb:. scott |
Impressive figures guys! :) Well done! :)
I best make sure we use high boost then, in the Spec C, for the 2010 ScoobySprint Championship! ;) :D |
Originally Posted by MartynJ
(Post 9040885)
Very nice figures guys.
Purely out of interest I will pop the dyno correction figures shown on the graph onto our dyno on Monday to see the overall correction factor. It may be interesting to apply the same corrections to all our graphs in future :thumb:. Simon |
Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
(Post 9041340)
I was annoyed the other week as I ran the same car on the same map at surrey rolling road and at scoobyclinic on different days and there was 0.4bhp difference on a car producing just over 500bhp.. disgraceful ;) lol
Simon |
when was the last time you saw a Barometric pressure reading of 978mb in this country Just as a sanity check I popped the post code into the Met Office weather database. It didn't have data for our exact location, closest was Nottingham Watnall and that read 992hPa at the time of the run. This site is 117m above mean sea level. According to Ordnance Survey the buildings at Scoobyclinic are 205m above mean sea level, some 88 metres higher. Pressure altitude calculations suggest that an 88 metre difference would result in about 10.5hPa difference in station pressure, which would give a "verified" station pressure of 981.5hPa at Clinic today, compared to the weather station reading of 978, a difference of only 3.5hPa, and that doesn't take into account the fact that the verified reading was a few miles away, ie there could easily have been a 3.5hPa pressure gradient, but I'm happy enough to accept that as an instrumentation error, the basic accuracy of weather stations is not on par with the lab grade stuff the Met Office use. Cheers, Pat. |
Pat is the man simple as.......
|
Originally Posted by pat
(Post 9041382)
Errrr... last time we looked at the weather station, shortly before playing around with the map. Not all of us live at sea level Martyn...
Just as a sanity check I popped the post code into the Met Office weather database. It didn't have data for our exact location, closest was Nottingham Watnall and that read 992hPa at the time of the run. This site is 117m above mean sea level. According to Ordnance Survey the buildings at Scoobyclinic are 205m above mean sea level, some 88 metres higher. Pressure altitude calculations suggest that an 88 metre difference would result in about 10.5hPa difference in station pressure, which would give a "verified" station pressure of 981.5hPa at Clinic today, compared to the weather station reading of 978, a difference of only 3.5hPa, and that doesn't take into account the fact that the verified reading was a few miles away, ie there could easily have been a 3.5hPa pressure gradient, but I'm happy enough to accept that as an instrumentation error, the basic accuracy of weather stations is not on par with the lab grade stuff the Met Office use. Cheers, Pat. Did you happen to note the overall correction factor stated on the dyno for the runs ? Not that it matters of course as anyone with a DD dyno can type in the numbers at the bottom of the graph and see it for themselves. |
Originally Posted by BIG FUD
(Post 9041543)
Pat is the man simple as.......
|
Originally Posted by Granby
(Post 9041674)
He is............i just wish i could understand what he was explaining :lol1:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Hi,
as promised, meth mix :thumb: Seems I didnt jinx it :D Attachment 53186 Boost and AFR showing power at the wheels Attachment 53187 This was achieved on V power and a 10% meth mix, all at 205m above mean sea level, ;) Shall we try it on race gas, :norty: Cheers Kev |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands