Originally Posted by Tidgy (Post 7475655)

also fruther to this, would public wet kipper floggings reduce crime rates?

Originally Posted by Tam the bam (Post 7475669)

Depends if you get a lot of wet Kippers who are criminals? :D

Originally Posted by Sonic' (Post 7472725)

Shouldn't option 3 be publicly flog her wet kipper ;)

Originally Posted by Vampire (Post 7473774)

I do see the smilies in your post, but it does raise an important observation (which is general - not aimed at you NS04).

If someone commits a crime, does that make it ok for people to commit a crime back? By that I mean, blackmail, which is basically what's happened as a result of the thread.

Assuming it is ok, where does the line get drawn? And who decides? Certainly not a court in this case, it's basically mob/vigilante justice.

I suppose it's a tough call, for some things I'd consider that vigilante justice is sometimes the only thing that works, but it's still illegal and basically 'wrong'.

Originally Posted by nsld (Post 8389409)

She hasnt been "blackmailed" in any way, shape or form, she's a thieving scumbag.

Leaving it to the plod would have got nowhere.

I wonder if people would have been so "understanding" of her plight if she was an 18 stone crack dealer packing a 9mm handgun and a scary dog rather than a bimbo with a reasonable rack?

That aside, I vote for publicly flogging her wet kipper or whatever it was.