All IMHO

Great, he is working with pensions - our money!, last time he was in charge of other peoples money i seem to remember he used it to buy rail tickets for his slapper and forgot to mention it - it is not a case of the amount more the principal or his lack of them bother me., oh and there's the matter of did he or didn't he help push along his slappers nannys asylum claim.

Hardly a man with his eye (so to speak) on the ball.

Good old Blair, keep it up!
:);)

Funny fella??

Hates his job yet can't be arsed to move?

Hates the Gov. but works for them?

Pete

And if he did?? Why not?? Use your positions of power I say!! Didn't affect anyone!!

Pete

https://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/imag..._pa203indx.jpg
your hard earned is safe with me boys:)

Unfortunatley Carl, the former is universally acknowledge as the truth. Even Alastair Campell admits that if NL hadn't got Rupert Murdoch onside, Bliar wouldn't have won in 97:(

Ah Pete, <tut-tut's> you miss the point, as Home Secretary his time would have been better spent focussing on security matters in the times we live in not checking through his slappers nanny's forms to make sure she can look after the kids while Blunkett plays hides the sausage with her boss.

Blunkett is a man of poor judgement and not right for government - still hardly suprising Blair picked him then. ;)

All again imho

"I quite like Blunkett, he seems to be about the only honest popular Labour MP. I don't agree with his ideas, but at least he is honest about things, nanny included."

haha - that'd be the bloke that fiddled the visa for his shag-piece's nanny, then lied about it? possibly the MOST honest Labour MP, but far from being actually honest :)

pmsl

pete are you going to say sorry when it all crashes in 2 to 3 yrs;)???

When what crashes??

Pete

The economy. If it lasts that long.

Chip

I was 13 when it happened. But have you ever heard of books? how old were you when the motorcar was invented, internal combustion engine? Just because you were not around doesnt mean you cant understand it. In fact maybe you can understand it better because you can look at it with an objective eye, rather than one biased by emotions. Thatcher brought this country from the dark ages, with a lot of pain. Major was incompetant and needed kicking out. Tony Blair gave the country a kick up the arse, but ultimately the only good thing to have come out of his rule, the economy, is a legacy of thatchers structural reform. And high tax high spend will see us back to the 1980's all over again. You can come back in 5 years and poke fun at me till the cows come home if im wrong. I wont be.

Agreed,he doesnt seem as desperate for approval as some of the others.

According to PSL then, its all ok to fiddle the system as long as you are in power and have the chance to do so.

He obviously agrees with NL having a foundation of lies, spin and cheating.

Les

The foundation of lies, spin and cheating is part of our heritage dating back before parliament even existed. It's just that NEW LABOUR do it better.

Utter rubbish! Until recently politicians had integrity coupled with the desire to serve the nation.

Now they seek only to serve only themselves at the expense of the populace.

Is this username a permanent fixture Alan, or just opportunistic trolling, poaching on pslewis's niche? ;)

You really think that until recently politicians had integrity? That's one of the funniest things I've heard in ages. Bravo!

Thanks for the PM's earlier, but you still havn't answered my question. :D

Your question was answered. If you can't accept the answer then the issue is entirely yours.:)

You did not answer the question. I do know the answer though...

:D

You mean your question earlier on this thread? Do try to be more specific alex.

If you cared to look at my previous posts in all my guises you'd see that I've always been anti tory and pro labour.

The smiley looks more and more desperate every time you use it, if you want answers to your questions then try begging a bit harder than you already have and I *might* deign to give you an answer much as I might throw a dog a scrap from the table.

This conversation is quite interesting when you can only read half of it, just not interesting enough to remove a troll from ignore though :D

No need to get tetchy just because I picked you up on a lame attempt to muscle in on pslewis's "swim". So much for honour amongst trolls, I guess you must be desperate for material now! :D

Oh and the :D signifies enjoyment, not desperation, however "desperate" you may be to interpret it otherwise! :D :D

Third Term?

Third Reich!

http://www.sjskyline.com/images/misc/blunkett.jpg

Sounding more and more desperate with every denial. Keep at it you may be able to convince yourself.

The proof of my contentions lies in the numerous posts I've made on the subject previously.

Your previous posts have been on any subject you thought would be annoying. However this time is different. Why bother registering "NewLabour" if not an opportunistic attempt to cash in on the Labour victory, a market pslewis and his misdirected left wing puppets have already got cornered?

You have limited your field because you are desperate for material.... I think if one were to run a thumb across your edge one would find it was distinctly dull these days! :D

Keep your grubby thumb to yourself, run it over whatever you usually do for your amusement on the long lonely nights.

Your contentions are incorrect in every sense, we have a fresh term of NEW LABOUR to enjoy, 4-5 yrs worth in fact. Great isn't it?:)

So that's a yes then. You have been reduced to opportunistic trolling, taking scraps from Lewis's pickings! LOL :D

It's a resounding no, you just don't choose to see it that way. I prefer to do my posting in accordance with the zeitgeist and my own beliefs. In that I'm 100% consistent.
Shame you can't see it or you *might* get the joke rather than being the butt of it.:)