ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   ScoobyNet General (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/)
-   -   Mugged by a 325Ci ? (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/375949-mugged-by-a-325ci.html)

New_scooby_04 02 November 2004 07:28 PM

OMG Those pricks in that Evo 7 so deserved that! :D

Apparently they'd forgotten about the M3s launch control!

Best

robby 02 November 2004 07:46 PM

My last car was a 325ci - very torquey, you don't have to change down to get it going.
The thing with it was as it was so smooth it didn't feel fast but it was quite nippy

chips are available for them as well :-)

Bodgery 02 November 2004 07:50 PM


Originally Posted by Keef69
I'm surprised you struggled with a 330i as I had several races with 330ci's when I had a chipped Golf, 167bhp and was evenly matched on acceleration, although the top end was only 122mph! I assume the convertible "ci" is the same spec as the "i" or am I wrong there?
Recently I have tussled with a new M3 and beaten it relatively easily, enough that he tried twice, then gave up. Also a new M5, which I must admit, was a close call. Neither of us could gain on the other and we were very evenly matched. I was pleased, as the M5 is known as very quick car, don't know the specs, but I'm sure someone will enlighten me. I'm running 288bhp & 264ft/lb and combined with the JDM STI gearing, it really does mean that most BMW's are not worth bothering with.

Have you driven a BMW or been in one? A 288 scoob will not touch a new M5 - they really couldn't have been trying, as any M5 owner on this BBS will surely agree. Nor would a chipped golf at 167 hold a 330, unless it weighed 12 grams, once at a reasonable speed.

330, M3 and M5 are class machines, all of which outpace a new shape scoob WRX from a rolling start. I have driven and owned a 330 and driven an M3 for a month or so. Complete class and very easy to drive quickly, with loads of grunt low down - that's where they can catch us scoob's out.

Go and test drive one then come back and tell us (honestly) about your experience.

Discussing very same with Rich down at Powerstation last week, as he did my geometry for me. If he rates 330's and M3's (which he does), who am I to disagree!?

Echo 02 November 2004 11:41 PM

...checks M3 prices on AutoTrader... :D

Snotboy! 03 November 2004 08:55 AM

I tried to race an m3 in my classic last year and ive never seen anything go like that before.It went past me like i was stood still.
Awesome machines!!

GREGGYG 03 November 2004 09:09 AM

Your car was probably having a bad moment! i've taken 325's and 330's a few times on A roads. I felt like you when I did get beaten though, or when I felt my car wasn't fast enough (WRX 03 PPP), in fact 12 days ago I part ex'd my lovely Scoobie for an Evo 7 FQ300, and yes, this car is the business, performance wise, in every respect, but I do miss my Scooby very much, and I will be getting another maybe next year, although it will be an STi this time, as I was never happy with the softish handling of the WRX, with Prodrive springs too!

Originally Posted by StiX
Subaru Impreza WRX PPP £22,095 4/1994 261/6000 257/3500 190bhp/ton 0-60 4.8 150mph

BMW 325Ci £25,250 6/2494 192/6000 181/3500 131bhp/ton 0-60 7.1 149

BMW 330Ci £27,990 6/2979 231/5900 221/3500 154bhp/ton 0-60 6.5 155

BMW M3 £39,730 6/3246 338/7900 269/5000 219bhp/ton 0-60 5.1 155


You should be able to murder the 325 I would have thought looking at those figures from evo above, easily beat the 330 and not be too far behind the M3?


Interestingly the P1:

Subaru Impreza P1 '00-'01 4/1994 276/6500 260/4000 219bhp/ton 0-60 4.9 150

has a power/weight ratio exactly the same as a modern M3.

Interesting for me anyway as my classic is making the same power as a P1, hence near enough the same figures :)


MattOz 03 November 2004 09:35 AM

What's even worse is when you get mugged by the diesels! ;) LOL :D

Matt

Mad Gypsy 03 November 2004 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by Bodgery
Have you driven a BMW or been in one? A 288 scoob will not touch a new M5 - they really couldn't have been trying, as any M5 owner on this BBS will surely agree. Nor would a chipped golf at 167 hold a 330, unless it weighed 12 grams, once at a reasonable speed.

330, M3 and M5 are class machines, all of which outpace a new shape scoob WRX from a rolling start. I have driven and owned a 330 and driven an M3 for a month or so. Complete class and very easy to drive quickly, with loads of grunt low down - that's where they can catch us scoob's out.

Go and test drive one then come back and tell us (honestly) about your experience.

Discussing very same with Rich down at Powerstation last week, as he did my geometry for me. If he rates 330's and M3's (which he does), who am I to disagree!?

Have to agree, my last car was a 310bhp STi Type R. Only on a launch could I pull away from an E46 M3, once rolling there was little in it. (though never went past 100 with one).

When I had my 323 (2.5) my friends classic waggon (chipped) couldn't murder me, it pulled away a little, but didn't thrash me. a 330 is a good match for a WRX and at higher speeds may be a little quicker, either way I'd say there's little in it.

I've yet to have a tussle with an E46 M3 in my 996 C2, though I have had a play with a STi7, by the time I got to 140 I'd pulled quite some distance from it.

I just don't see a 288bhp scoob beating a M3.

Cars like M3's and 911's will match scoob's and Evo's to 60-80 but after that, they really are faster cars.

StickyMicky 03 November 2004 10:15 AM

heard it all before

Leslie 03 November 2004 11:12 AM

Yes ajm, we could have doen a exchange deal :). The main reason I did the change was that Mrs Leslie reckoned the STi was like a tin can which I thought was a bit rude! Anyway all for the sake of peace she is happy now.

That clip about the Evo was revealing, I dont think it was launch control so much, he just pulled away easily once they had been going for a short distance. Thats more or less how I see it with mine. The Beemer is higher geared and the very good acceleration it has just continues all the way up the rev scale, in fact it improves when you reach 5K revs. The variable valve timing gives it an enormous advantage.

Now you can see why that although I loved my Scoob, I'm not unhappy with the Beemer.

Les

john banks 03 November 2004 11:18 AM

A 340 BHP Classic Scooby edges away from an M3 at high speed if you are in front from what I've seen. Doesn't mean you can get past though if you are behind with the typical space available!

automodellistagt 03 November 2004 12:34 PM

i try and play with m3's but only when its to my advantage i.e. not in a straight line


seriously though unless it is an m i dont really bother with it unless offcause they fancy a bit. If i could afford it i would swap my 04 STi PPP for an E46 M3

Mosquito 03 November 2004 03:10 PM

The other week i had a car 'pushing' me along in the roadworks section of a dual carriageway (30 mph for a stretch - and i was doing just over 30 creeping past some cars in the inside). I thought as soon as we get back into the de-restricted 70 zone i'd nail it and teach this car a lesson. (It was dark and i couldn't see what it was - xenons are pretty bright in your rear-view mirror).

So the 70 signs appear, i'm in second gear ready to hand this guy his ass on a plate - i pull over into the inside lane (perfect luck of overtaking all the traffic) and nail it (after the customary squirt of intercooler spray obviously!). I had a smug grin on my face ready to gloat - the car goes past me like i wasn't accelerating! It continued to dissapear nearly too fast for me to catch what or more to the point who it was!

My Dad in his RS4.

Now from what i understand, once rolling, the new M3's aren't that much slower than the RS4's - make from that what you will!!

However, i did obliterate a TVR 350C this morning from the lights. I think i was dropping third before he'd got any traction!! (before anybody starts i know how quick they are but on greasy roads.......)

I've got a MY03 Sti UK spec by the way.

Chris.

Leslie 04 November 2004 11:33 AM

One point worth making is that not all drivers are prepared to wind their cars up to max performance against another one since it is a licence losing procedure if you are caught at it. So if you found you left another car for dead, don't assume he could not have done the same for you if he wanted to.

Les

billythekid 04 November 2004 12:08 PM

Once you are going above 70mph the drag co-efficient has a lot to do with it.

My Caterham will do 0-60 in less than 4 seconds (430bhp/ton), but over 70mph its about as aerodynamic as an aircraft carrier and really starts to slow. On track days I really start to struggle over 110mph, cars like TVR and Ferrari etc just start to pull away... but I get them under braking or on the exit of the next corner :norty:

RB5Caterham 04 November 2004 05:36 PM

Its like most things with a Scooby, get caught in the wrong gear off boost and most cars will seem like they got away.

BUT you will catch them, oh boy you will !! ;)

akshay67 04 November 2004 05:52 PM

Personal experience has shown that my 260-270bhp impreza keeps up with an E36 M3 in most speed ranges up to 70mph. Beyond that the M3 pulls away convincingly...prob due to lower transmission loss and better areodynamics....

RB5Caterham 04 November 2004 05:57 PM

35 mph in 4th gear in both an M3 and Impreza on a straight flat road.

Each driver puts their foot right down on the pedal, who will edge away?

BTW I have had an E36 M3 and my current love is an RB5 with Decat. :D

LG John 04 November 2004 06:14 PM

RB5Caterham, easy the M3! My 406 would obliterate a standard classic in 4th gear from 35mph! I'd much prefer a battle in 3rd gear from 5mph - which btw the pug will pull cleanly from ;):D

Scoobys do not like the high gears at low speeds. They won't entertain 5th at 30mph!

Brun 04 November 2004 07:32 PM

Mine does :p .........just :D

virgin 04 November 2004 08:29 PM


Originally Posted by RecordProduction.com
...checks M3 prices on AutoTrader... :D

:)

EIL132 04 November 2004 09:54 PM


Originally Posted by Saxo Boy
Ceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

That pretty much demonstrates my experience of M3s! I raced one in my VTS and the distance it pulled on me going down a slip-road is best measured in football pitches! I was going backwards!!! I've seen them at full chat on other occassions and they pull like hell!! The ONLY time I've seen one beaten was when I was in sg72s 415bhp Type-R and we destroyed the M3 but then we would with that p/w/r and short gearing!

M3s make their power waaaay up the rev-range. I expect a lot of would be M3 slayers might find that they were not being shifted bawhairs from the redline as is required for maximum acceleration.


Exactly. First sensible reply to this

Bubba po 04 November 2004 10:38 PM

Racing on a public road could be construed as being a little irresponsible, but each to their own :mad:

wacky.banana 04 November 2004 10:44 PM


Originally Posted by Saxo Boy
The launch of the EVO sucked though! The guy could have saved himself at least a few of the car lenghts of his defeat if he'd put her off the line well!

Just watched the video of this. Seemed to go really quiet in the Evo after the M3 had pulled away. Maybe a lesson to those of us who think we drive a car that's unbeatable, perhaps? :)

LG John 05 November 2004 12:27 AM

It would have been so much funnier if the passenger had laughed and just said, 'you've been spanked mate!!'

fast_eddie 05 November 2004 03:26 PM

seems like a ot of scoob owners haven't come across an m3 being driven propely ie over 5k on the rev meter,i have owned in the last 3 years a 300 bhp terzo a 310 bhp bugeye and a ppp 03 sti also a e36 m3 evo and i can tell you that altho the 4 cars are pretty similar up to 80 mph the m3 is in a different league after that and pulls away no problem when being revved up to the red line which is where a lot of bmw drivers are going wrong as they change up to early to get the best out of the engine.
As an example 40mph in 4th gear you can floor the m3 and not have to change up to 5th until you are doing 140mph it has 170 on the clock and does it no problem even tho restricted to 155 it still goes to 170 on the clock i dont know of many scoobs that will do that, its not a slur on the scoobs as i love them to bits and would have another but a comparision is what you have just read by someone who has owned both.

backdoors 05 November 2004 03:37 PM


Originally Posted by fast_eddie
seems like a ot of scoob owners haven't come across an m3 being driven propely ie over 5k on the rev meter,i have owned in the last 3 years a 300 bhp terzo a 310 bhp bugeye and a ppp 03 sti also a e36 m3 evo and i can tell you that altho the 4 cars are pretty similar up to 80 mph the m3 is in a different league after that and pulls away no problem when being revved up to the red line which is where a lot of bmw drivers are going wrong as they change up to early to get the best out of the engine.
As an example 40mph in 4th gear you can floor the m3 and not have to change up to 5th until you are doing 140mph it has 170 on the clock and does it no problem even tho restricted to 155 it still goes to 170 on the clock i dont know of many scoobs that will do that, its not a slur on the scoobs as i love them to bits and would have another but a comparision is what you have just read by someone who has owned both.

Someone call Norris McWhirter,I've seen the longest sentence in history !

Sith 05 November 2004 03:40 PM

No substitute for cubes.

hades 06 November 2004 12:05 AM

No substitute for cubes? Other than light weight, forced induction or well tuned engines, reduced transmission / aerodynamic losses to name a few things, you mean? Unfortunately, a scoob only has one of the above. Hence whilst standard/lightly modded scoobs are quicker than most "normal" cars, they aren't truly fast or supercar status or anything. However, pit the M3 against, say a 900cc bike or a 1300cc radical turbo, which would win? At the other end of the scale, throw in a 1990 oldsmobile saloon, or perhaps an 11 litre truck!

An M3 has (a) a lot more power at the wheels than most scoobs, and (b) better aerodynamics, hence is likely to be a lot quicker at high speeds. To go to the original point, I'd guess a 325i probably has getting on for 150bhp at the rear wheels, and a 330i getting on for 200, again with better aerodynamics. A non-PPP'd WRX might not make 150 at the wheels, and would need a turbo change to go far over 200.

I also stand by my comment made a lot earlier. If you're caught in the wrong gear by someone who gets on the power before you and is moderately quick (and being 2 seconds slower than a mild scoob from say 30-80 is not really very fast), it's going to take a long while to catch back up.

Sith 06 November 2004 12:43 AM

I doubt there's that many Scoobs that will take a new M3. Spec C excluded. The bigger cubed engine is going to be far less stressed than a high power turbo. I would take an NA engine of equal power and torque any day.
You've forgotten to mention gearing and power production point aswell. We all know how quick the scoob is off the line, but as shown in the vid of the Evo vs M3, the M3 clearly has the legs. Yes the M3 is RWD and has better aero, but my money is on the M3 round a track aswell. The M3 is a far better all round car.

And mixing Radical's and Bikes is not really in the equation when comparing Scoob and M3 or 325.

I think you knew exactly what I meant by the statement I made.

What will we have next, people with mildly modded scoobs claiming to have taken a new M5. :rolleyes:
My brother has a fairly new 3 series Ci. It's not the fastest off the line. But it still feels quick in gear. When I just had a decat on the scoob, I had a pop at a 325, and I didn't gain as quickly as I expected. At one point he was pulling away.

Also the new Vxhall 3.2 GSi, I bet that is as fast as a standard scoob in gear.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands