|
I'm glad someone picked up on the line ;)
|
Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
(Post 11616973)
In the middle ages the Church was the dominant institution holding social life together, yet as Foucault points out it touched life much less efficiently .
Killing someone with a claw hammer is less efficient than a bullet to the head The result/effect is the same, simply messier and more traumatic |
Originally Posted by ditchmyster
(Post 11616981)
Boris ia a bit of a prat, I quite like this line. Do they seriously not know the reason or are they just trying to push the onus back on to muslims and blame them for the current situation.
"But they are not explaining how it can be that this one religion seems to be leading people astray in so many cases." :idea: Maybe if the west stopped bombing them they might consider returning the favour. :thumb: |
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
(Post 11617003)
"Less efficiency" confers no sense of effectiveness
Killing someone with a claw hammer is less efficient than a bullet to the head The result/effect is the same, simply messier and more traumatic |
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11617016)
The west hasn't bombed Nigeria.
|
Originally Posted by lozgti1
(Post 11616610)
Not that it creates any sense of a divide between people.
Aren't people just people and don't need their network groups?! Will it never ever stop.... |
The west already has its greasy mits on the oil there
nothing to be gained |
Theyve even voted Mugabe in to sort out Boko Haram
even though he cant even make it through a meeting without falling asleep / thinking about his next ,endless, holiday |
Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
(Post 11616971)
You sound like a Marxist. :lol1:
|
[QUOTE=legb4rsk;11617098]I know lots of different people.I don't know any that want to kill innocent people because they don't think the same as them.So the answer to your question is no. people aren't just people.[/QUOTE
Its sad :-( |
Originally Posted by JTaylor
(Post 11616806)
Terrific, but what's your culture and heritage and identity?
|
As if by magic an indignant believer appeared ;)
|
Originally Posted by 53
(Post 11617186)
As if by magic an indignant believer appeared ;)
|
So if you're not religious you have less right/interest or qualification to express an opinion about religion ? That shows a rather shallow preconceived idea that someone that doesn't believe has less understanding or experience of religion and it's social and psychological impact ;) But hey I wouldn't want to kick your crutches away ;)
|
And lol at only turns up :lol1: 10 years of quality ;) The religious indignation of a self important minority is ruining scoobynet I think you'll find my membership contribution is rather more significant than imaginary friends in the sky ;)
|
Bombers look at porn :lol1:
Ooooo I'm gonna BOmb that Ass... Sticks his torpedo in her Bomb Ass. :D |
@53 re. your #44 and #45
RA Dunk in his #44 is on your side. You may be getting at Shaid, but it looks like a 'wires crossed' situation. Sorry, if that's not the case. |
Originally Posted by Turbohot
(Post 11617319)
@53 re. your #44 and #45
RA Dunk in his #44 is on your side. You may be getting at Shaid, but it looks like a 'wires crossed' situation. Sorry, if that's not the case. |
Must be a non believing fail cnut ;)
|
Originally Posted by DYK
(Post 11617308)
Bombers look at porn :lol1:
Ooooo I'm gonna BOmb that Ass... Sticks his torpedo in her Bomb Ass. :D |
Originally Posted by 53
(Post 11617257)
So if you're not religious you have less right/interest or qualification to express an opinion about religion ? That shows a rather shallow preconceived idea that someone that doesn't believe has less understanding or experience of religion and it's social and psychological impact ;) But hey I wouldn't want to kick your crutches away ;)
I was talking about Shaid who often says he is not that religious, but only appears on here on threads relating to religion. :) |
Originally Posted by RA Dunk
(Post 11617353)
I'm not religious, I'm the opposite of religious. :lol1: I was talking about Shaid who often says he is not that religious, but only appears on here on threads relating to religion. :)
|
Originally Posted by RA Dunk
(Post 11617353)
I'm not religious, I'm the opposite of religious. :lol1:
I was talking about Shaid who often says he is not that religious, but only appears on here on threads relating to religion. :) |
Originally Posted by thenewgalaxy
(Post 11617343)
Weapons of ass destruction :D
|
Originally Posted by thenewgalaxy
(Post 11617343)
Weapons of ass destruction :D
|
Is that Uncle Ben Kwik ?!
|
Originally Posted by lozgti1
(Post 11617551)
Is that Uncle Ben Kwik ?!
|
:lol1:lol
|
Originally Posted by RA Dunk
(Post 11617353)
I'm not religious, I'm the opposite of religious. :lol1:
I was talking about Shaid who often says he is not that religious, but only appears on here on threads relating to religion. :) I've responded on a couple of more threads in an attempt to erm... 'Integrate' |
Originally Posted by 53
(Post 11617119)
Agreeing with a point of philosophy doesn't make you an 'ist" of anything. An existential appreciation of ones existence is healthy and thus valid comment is found all across the considered political/philosophical spectrum. Religion is just a coping mechanism for a personal existential crisis conveniently delivered by via an establishment to achieve social order and contol. Rational well adjusted people have no need of such psychological crutches. :)
Amen to that brother. :thumb: |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands