Royal Mail to be privatised
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cant be a worse service, - postal costs have risen a lot in last few years- yet no better service.
I don't even think the postman comes once a day to where I live, yet the local post office when its open is good, but I guess that's more the people running the local PO than anything.
I guess the Royal Mail is another example of an old institution been badly run for many years by people with no concept of costs or running a profitable business
Richard
I don't even think the postman comes once a day to where I live, yet the local post office when its open is good, but I guess that's more the people running the local PO than anything.
I guess the Royal Mail is another example of an old institution been badly run for many years by people with no concept of costs or running a profitable business
Richard
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not even the Yanks privatise their postal service! If you think it's bad value for money now, wait until it's privatised.
To get the service you want, prices will have to rise significantly, and things like deliveries to Mr A. Hermit in them thar hills will prove uneconomical unless a tier service is introduced, and how will that work? Or, to cover that cost, the all in one price will get hiked.
RM ain't perfect, but privatising it isn't the answer.
Some things just aren't made to be profitable, they are a service.
Geezer
To get the service you want, prices will have to rise significantly, and things like deliveries to Mr A. Hermit in them thar hills will prove uneconomical unless a tier service is introduced, and how will that work? Or, to cover that cost, the all in one price will get hiked.
RM ain't perfect, but privatising it isn't the answer.
Some things just aren't made to be profitable, they are a service.
Geezer
Trending Topics
#8
We pay billions in subsidy already, so to say it will cost us more is difficult to say, depends on if the charges increase more than the subsidy we already pay.
Privatised companies tend to be better at, shall we say, 'efficiency savings' than public organisations, so we can but hope.
Privatised companies tend to be better at, shall we say, 'efficiency savings' than public organisations, so we can but hope.
#9
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
TNT delivery the hospital post in N.Ireland - and they're useless.
Chap I work with got a letter recently telling him about a hospital appointment.
He received the letter the day before the 9:30am appointment was scheduled.
There was a postmark date 7 days before he received it.
Chap I work with got a letter recently telling him about a hospital appointment.
He received the letter the day before the 9:30am appointment was scheduled.
There was a postmark date 7 days before he received it.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not even the Yanks privatise their postal service! If you think it's bad value for money now, wait until it's privatised.
To get the service you want, prices will have to rise significantly, and things like deliveries to Mr A. Hermit in them thar hills will prove uneconomical unless a tier service is introduced, and how will that work? Or, to cover that cost, the all in one price will get hiked.
To get the service you want, prices will have to rise significantly, and things like deliveries to Mr A. Hermit in them thar hills will prove uneconomical unless a tier service is introduced, and how will that work? Or, to cover that cost, the all in one price will get hiked.
#11
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But for post, it's dead easy. Someone has to physically deliver it each time. It's a cost each and every time you have to do it. Nice and easy savings to be had, or prices hikes to be had.
Geezer
#13
To get the service you want, prices will have to rise significantly, and things like deliveries to Mr A. Hermit in them thar hills will prove uneconomical unless a tier service is introduced, and how will that work? Or, to cover that cost, the all in one price will get hiked.
#14
As a sweeping statement, I'd say things improve when in an industry where there is healthy competition - it's the only thing that forces prices/charges to be kept in check. Case in point - railways.
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 535D M-Sport Touring
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bad analogy - the majority of folk who live "up in the hills" have to have either their gas or oil shipped in at a much higher cost than those of us on the mains. Only way to save is if you have a regular supply of cheap solid fuel (i.e. you own a woodland).
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As long as conditions are laid down to deal with deliveries then I really don't see a problem.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When was the last time your gas/electric was shut off compared to before privatisation( if your old enough to remember).?
Before privatisation we had power cuts quite often, mainly due to the idiots that were led like sheep by Scargill.
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
Not even the Yanks privatise their postal service! If you think it's bad value for money now, wait until it's privatised.
To get the service you want, prices will have to rise significantly, and things like deliveries to Mr A. Hermit in them thar hills will prove uneconomical unless a tier service is introduced, and how will that work? Or, to cover that cost, the all in one price will get hiked.
RM ain't perfect, but privatising it isn't the answer.
Some things just aren't made to be profitable, they are a service.
Geezer
To get the service you want, prices will have to rise significantly, and things like deliveries to Mr A. Hermit in them thar hills will prove uneconomical unless a tier service is introduced, and how will that work? Or, to cover that cost, the all in one price will get hiked.
RM ain't perfect, but privatising it isn't the answer.
Some things just aren't made to be profitable, they are a service.
Geezer
The other thing that seems to be overlooked is the universal service obligation (uso) that Vince Cable was making noise about. RM are the only company in the UK that are bout by this law which is enforced by the regulator. TNT, DHL or whoever are perfectly within their rights to 'cherry pick' the profitable parts of the postal service, i.e. dense towns, large businesses etc and they do, London and Manchester being two examples. This erodes RM's ability to make profits, for example, how can the profitable parts of the business subsidise the not-so-profitable parts if the profitable parts are being 'cherry picked' by the competitor - who employ staff on zero hour contracts on an as and when needed basis. That can't be good for the economy imho.
Last edited by BLU; 10 July 2013 at 05:00 PM.
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pensions were the millstone around PO's neck and that has been taken off them although I am not quite sure how??
In very basic terms service has got worse. In the "good old days" you got your post early in morning and sometimes a second delivery in the afternoon. Now you are lucky to get mail by mid afternoon. And I think postal costs have risen out of line.
It's now mainly a parcel company serving the internet. But gradually people will realise that their parcel prices can usually be beaten by one of the myriad of courier companies.
dl
In very basic terms service has got worse. In the "good old days" you got your post early in morning and sometimes a second delivery in the afternoon. Now you are lucky to get mail by mid afternoon. And I think postal costs have risen out of line.
It's now mainly a parcel company serving the internet. But gradually people will realise that their parcel prices can usually be beaten by one of the myriad of courier companies.
dl
#20
What pissed me off is that my local GPO shut and was relocated into the top floor of WH Smiths.
Want to buy an envelope to post something? You can't, you have to buy a pack of 10. It's ****ing stupid.
Want to buy an envelope to post something? You can't, you have to buy a pack of 10. It's ****ing stupid.
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
In very basic terms service has got worse. In the "good old days" you got your post early in morning and sometimes a second delivery in the afternoon. Now you are lucky to get mail by mid afternoon. And I think postal costs have risen out of line.
It's now mainly a parcel company serving the internet. But gradually people will realise that their parcel prices can usually be beaten by one of the myriad of courier companies.
It's now mainly a parcel company serving the internet. But gradually people will realise that their parcel prices can usually be beaten by one of the myriad of courier companies.
The late post is due to the moving of the employee start times to later in the morning on top of a greater workload.
Its far from being a parcels company (thats what parcelforce is for) although parcel delivery have increased greatly, letters whilst in decline still account for a large portion of RM's business (not forgetting the delivery of competitors mail too)!
Last edited by BLU; 10 July 2013 at 08:21 PM.
#23
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wherever I park my car, that's my home
Posts: 20,491
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I think the precedent has been set, British Gas, British Telecom etc - great British institutions that once privatised became focused upon corporate bonuses and shareholder dividends and not worried in the slightest about customer satisfaction. Email is still free
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Far Corfe
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think this is mad. The Govt has decided to take on the pension debt and the PO has started to make a profit any way, 450 Million in the last year for the public, so why sell it? We going to get any of the profit if its sold?
Do any of the other nationalised industries provide good service at a good price? You all know it will end up in foreign hands. I'll guarantee that the service gets worse.
Do any of the other nationalised industries provide good service at a good price? You all know it will end up in foreign hands. I'll guarantee that the service gets worse.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bt is better. I'm old enough to remember when you had to pay someone to plug in a new phone. Maggie put a stop to all that rubbish.
#26
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wherever I park my car, that's my home
Posts: 20,491
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Like-for-like every TV, broadband and phone package I look at and BT offers the worst value
#27
I'm surprised they took on the pensions liabilities. It's a kind of fake Capitalism where the state has to weigh in to make a market viable IMHO, but that is the neoliberal way. Having said that public pension liabilities are staggering and what is a few more billion?
#28
Scooby Regular
The other thing that seems to be overlooked is the universal service obligation (uso) that Vince Cable was making noise about. RM are the only company in the UK that are bout by this law which is enforced by the regulator. TNT, DHL or whoever are perfectly within their rights to 'cherry pick' the profitable parts of the postal service, i.e. dense towns, large businesses etc and they do, London and Manchester being two examples. This erodes RM's ability to make profits, for example, how can the profitable parts of the business subsidise the not-so-profitable parts if the profitable parts are being 'cherry picked' by the competitor - who employ staff on zero hour contracts on an as and when needed basis. That can't be good for the economy imho.
If they were given a level playing feild to operate on maybe they would do a lot better
The same happened with the Post Office Counters side of the business, when they permitted other shops to start selling things normally sold only at the Post Office, but kept the restrictions on things the Post Office couldn't sell