RAF planes: where are they all?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF planes: where are they all?
When I was a youngster (late '70s to '80s), I used to regularly see military aircraft flying overhead in Northants/S Leics. We used to get A10's, Jaguars, Tornados, Harriers, Hawks, Hercules and the occasional rarity like a Corsair, F4, F5, F15 & F16 or even a visiting Luftwaffe Starfighter. I would probably estimate about 15 - 25 sorties per day close to where we lived (not particularly close to any airbases).
Nowadays I can spend all day driving the length or breadth of the country and see practically no military aircraft whatsoever, unless I am close to an airbase or target range. I know that the Americans have a smaller contingent over here these days and really only operate their F15s regularly out of Lakenheath (compared to bases at Bentwaters, Woodbridge, Alconbury, Upper Heyford in the past etc.), but where are all the RAF planes? Are they really all in Afghanistan? Do we just practice flying in simulators now? Have they been ordered to keep clear of the more populated areas of the country?
Nowadays I can spend all day driving the length or breadth of the country and see practically no military aircraft whatsoever, unless I am close to an airbase or target range. I know that the Americans have a smaller contingent over here these days and really only operate their F15s regularly out of Lakenheath (compared to bases at Bentwaters, Woodbridge, Alconbury, Upper Heyford in the past etc.), but where are all the RAF planes? Are they really all in Afghanistan? Do we just practice flying in simulators now? Have they been ordered to keep clear of the more populated areas of the country?
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.Surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its a very good question, We get a small amount but we are in the flight path of RAF Odiham, But apart from when the Farnborough air show is on we see nothing of note.
#7
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wherever I park my car, that's my home
Posts: 20,491
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Committed to operations in the Middle East/Afghanistan/Falkland Islands etc. As the technology of the aircraft improves there is a lesser need to have as many aircraft as there are now more multi-role aircraft.
RAF Operational Update - Op Update 12 Apr 2009
Additionally, as commercial air traffic increases, the amount of airspace available for military flying is reducing. There are still areas over the UK that are used for flying training, but more training happens on simulators as it is more cost effective, and increasingly over more remote areas of the UK to minimise disturbance to the general populus.
RAF Operational Update - Op Update 12 Apr 2009
Additionally, as commercial air traffic increases, the amount of airspace available for military flying is reducing. There are still areas over the UK that are used for flying training, but more training happens on simulators as it is more cost effective, and increasingly over more remote areas of the UK to minimise disturbance to the general populus.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,706
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
54 Posts
The RAF can't afford the petrol to fly em! When I was in the army the crab chopper pilots were complaining they didn't have enough troop carrying flying time due to the cost of fuel and that was in the early 90s. So if they can't afford to fly choppers I am sure they can't afford the petrol for a jet fighter jaunt.
#10
When an Apache costs £20,000 per hour of flying, I can see why hardly any flights are being flown in the UK.
Also, most aircrew are going to spend some time in either Iraq or Afghanistan at some point where they will get plenty of flying hours in.
Also, most aircrew are going to spend some time in either Iraq or Afghanistan at some point where they will get plenty of flying hours in.
#11
Plenty of Apache flying around Middle Wallop (Hants). The Apache CTR (conversion to role) training takes place in Arizona.
#14
I live on the exit to the Spadeadam range
RAF Spadeadam - RAF Spadeadam
The RAF give the local papers times when they are flying but for the last few years it's been pretty quiet.
The biggest activity is when they take over Carlisle Airport with about 10 choppers every 2 years (apache) and the local TA turn out in force to protect the airfield. We all know about it as again it's in the local papers and lots of new roadsigns appear to direct the TA to the airfield.
Whatever happened to the Cold War LOL
Shaun
RAF Spadeadam - RAF Spadeadam
The RAF give the local papers times when they are flying but for the last few years it's been pretty quiet.
The biggest activity is when they take over Carlisle Airport with about 10 choppers every 2 years (apache) and the local TA turn out in force to protect the airfield. We all know about it as again it's in the local papers and lots of new roadsigns appear to direct the TA to the airfield.
Whatever happened to the Cold War LOL
Shaun
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's ironic really: all those decades of Cold War and the RAF never actually needed to shoot anyone down. Sure they would intercept the odd Soviet "Badger" or "Bear" over some North Sea oil rig for a propaganda photo-shoot or two, but they never actually had to loose off any Sidewinders at them.
However, in the 20 years since the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, the RAF have been on combat missions for nearly all of that time. Gulf War I in the early 1990's, Kosovo in the late 1990's, Afghanistan since 2001 and Gulf War II in 2003. Despite this, the number of attack aircraft in the RAF seems to have diminished markedly. Let's hope we don't have any more wars at least until the Joint Strike Fighter arrives in 20XX! Blimey, if it wasn't for our Trident deterrent, I bet the Germans would be seriously considering another pop at old Blighty by now!
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are all in Cornwall waking up our baby son every day for no reason.
Seem that they love flying up the river valley we overlook and actually fly "below" our house sometimes. Gits.
Seem that they love flying up the river valley we overlook and actually fly "below" our house sometimes. Gits.
#20
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#21
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NB: Are the Cornish separatists getting militant then???
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think they must be. If Cornwall did gain independence, it would last about 4 seconds before plunging back into the dark ages.
#27
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From Wiki:
"In 2001, it was announced that the Royal Air Force (RAF) would not use the aircraft's internal 27 mm Mauser cannon. This was due to a desire to save money by removing gun support costs, ammunition stocks, training costs, etc. The gun was also deemed unnecessary since the missile armament was believed to be adequate in the Typhoon's fighter role. However, because removal of the cannon would affect the aircraft's flight characteristics, requiring modification of the aircraft's flight software the RAF decided that all of its Typhoons would be fitted with the cannon but that it would not be used or supported. The service argued that this would save money by reducing the requirement for ground equipment, removing training costs and avoiding the fatigue effects of firing the cannon. The RAF maintained the option to activate the cannons at very short notice were operational requirements to change. However in a third change of policy, the Daily Telegraph reported on 3 October 2006 that the RAF will fully utilise the cannon."
So do they or don't they have a fully functioning cannon in RAF spec?
"In 2001, it was announced that the Royal Air Force (RAF) would not use the aircraft's internal 27 mm Mauser cannon. This was due to a desire to save money by removing gun support costs, ammunition stocks, training costs, etc. The gun was also deemed unnecessary since the missile armament was believed to be adequate in the Typhoon's fighter role. However, because removal of the cannon would affect the aircraft's flight characteristics, requiring modification of the aircraft's flight software the RAF decided that all of its Typhoons would be fitted with the cannon but that it would not be used or supported. The service argued that this would save money by reducing the requirement for ground equipment, removing training costs and avoiding the fatigue effects of firing the cannon. The RAF maintained the option to activate the cannons at very short notice were operational requirements to change. However in a third change of policy, the Daily Telegraph reported on 3 October 2006 that the RAF will fully utilise the cannon."
So do they or don't they have a fully functioning cannon in RAF spec?
#28
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From Wiki:
"In 2001, it was announced that the Royal Air Force (RAF) would not use the aircraft's internal 27 mm Mauser cannon. This was due to a desire to save money by removing gun support costs, ammunition stocks, training costs, etc. The gun was also deemed unnecessary since the missile armament was believed to be adequate in the Typhoon's fighter role. However, because removal of the cannon would affect the aircraft's flight characteristics, requiring modification of the aircraft's flight software the RAF decided that all of its Typhoons would be fitted with the cannon but that it would not be used or supported. The service argued that this would save money by reducing the requirement for ground equipment, removing training costs and avoiding the fatigue effects of firing the cannon. The RAF maintained the option to activate the cannons at very short notice were operational requirements to change. However in a third change of policy, the Daily Telegraph reported on 3 October 2006 that the RAF will fully utilise the cannon."
So do they or don't they have a fully functioning cannon in RAF spec?
"In 2001, it was announced that the Royal Air Force (RAF) would not use the aircraft's internal 27 mm Mauser cannon. This was due to a desire to save money by removing gun support costs, ammunition stocks, training costs, etc. The gun was also deemed unnecessary since the missile armament was believed to be adequate in the Typhoon's fighter role. However, because removal of the cannon would affect the aircraft's flight characteristics, requiring modification of the aircraft's flight software the RAF decided that all of its Typhoons would be fitted with the cannon but that it would not be used or supported. The service argued that this would save money by reducing the requirement for ground equipment, removing training costs and avoiding the fatigue effects of firing the cannon. The RAF maintained the option to activate the cannons at very short notice were operational requirements to change. However in a third change of policy, the Daily Telegraph reported on 3 October 2006 that the RAF will fully utilise the cannon."
So do they or don't they have a fully functioning cannon in RAF spec?
#29
When we were flying at low level, which was most of the time in the job I did, we would deliberately avoid populated areas and also farms etc. so that we caused the very minimum of any disturbance. Spadeadam was a great place for a bit of hooliganism though!
I imagine that their flying is highly restricted now comparatively speaking from the point of view of cost as much as anything.
Les
I imagine that their flying is highly restricted now comparatively speaking from the point of view of cost as much as anything.
Les
#30
We still get a fair amount here, though i am on the run in to Leeming. Tends to go in phases which i guess is to do with their training, we get the small props for a while then hawks, hawks and tornados and then tornados on their own, and a LOT of low stuff, i guess our village doesn't count as a population area.
Interestingly they've been doing it a lot more at night too, last night at about 10ish which they supposedly don't do anymore because of complaints
Had a few eurofighters, get harriers now and then and some kind of wargame a few weeks ago involving lots of low flying hercs and helicopters.
Still less then we did tho, haven't seen american stuff for ages, f'15's were always the loudest
Interestingly they've been doing it a lot more at night too, last night at about 10ish which they supposedly don't do anymore because of complaints
Had a few eurofighters, get harriers now and then and some kind of wargame a few weeks ago involving lots of low flying hercs and helicopters.
Still less then we did tho, haven't seen american stuff for ages, f'15's were always the loudest