Seems to me that there are more posts about infractions, legitimate or otherwise, than anything else.

 

People are going infractocrazy I blame labour and pikeys

 

I blame the Webmaster



<--------------Watch

 

I blame it on the boogie

 

Sweet baby Jesus and he orphans, your gonna pay for that

 

I could post a picture of a bunch of red roses being held by Ghandi at the funeral of Mother Teresa and I'd still be infracted for it, KOT

 

It only bothers you if you let it....

and its fun to be infracted, how else would you know you've crossed that line

 

Normal people with Infractor guns don't bother me in the slightest, DCI, it's the special needs cases that get on my ****

 

That's everyone then

 

All my infractions have been from the webby. I feel quite sad no one hates me enough to infract me

 

coming from chief windowlicker himself

 

I'd infract you.... but someone took my Infracticator 3000 off me

 

So liking the taste of frosty windows is a crime now then

 

Name and shame Karl.

Otherwise, stop whingeing

 

Well it's not me. I've only ever infracted someone once, and that was a blatant spammer.

Some people's Infractor guns seem to have hair triggers though.

In the military, we call that an ND. Negligent Discharge. Seems approriate somehow...

 

Which socially challenged individual infracted Karl for that ffs?????

edit - that would be one of the special needs cases presumably

 

Come on then.... who are the biggest tos.... sorry I mean "Infractors" on here???

 

Whoever infracted Karl should also infract me as I called everyone 'special needs'

*awaits infraction*

 

If anythig the infraction system has destroyed the community not made it stronger. Muppets is fubarred these days

 

yup someone infract this spaccer people with special needs should not be allowed near the internet

 

No, that's not true.... overall its worked, the trouble is (as karl says) its being abused by some!

Still that's what policy is for

 

You try typing with your feckin nose... its snot easy you know!

 

I can see the pro's and con's..... but this is my prob....if you are actively participating in a thread and somebody goes nuclear on you then fair enough, infract them... but i do not think window shoppers should infract......

 

Great example of the problem

I doubt very much that SGH was insulted by this, and hence no infraction necessary. Yet some socially challenged poster may assume otherwise.

Its all about context. Something which the infraction system doesn't do very well

 

Correct, look a post 8

What a bloody joke

 

Does one feel that using the words "window licker" and "spaccer" are acceptable terms for silly people or infracters.

I for one do not.

 

Post 8 was a private joke between Karl and myself, it wasn't offensive, I wasn't bothered by it.... so who else has the right to infract him on my behalf??

 

Well old bean good for you.





spacco lover

 

"silly people" are you 10 years old?

 

I'd guess so, but the infractamania will stay for a while yet, until people start protesting by posting elsewhere and using other sites, it's started to happen already but will happen more and more, then the hits will drop, then the advertising revenue will drop, then the infractors will self infract, but by then it may be too late and the palace will crumble, with the princess still inside. Farquar, Farquar, where are you?

Sorry, I drifted off there for a minute, anyway, you get the gist?