FlightMan

Seems to me that there are more posts about infractions, legitimate or otherwise, than anything else.

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

People are going infractocrazy I blame labour and pikeys

Karl 227

I blame the Webmaster



<--------------Watch

Tam the bam

I blame it on the boogie

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

Sweet baby Jesus and he orphans, your gonna pay for that

Karl 227

I could post a picture of a bunch of red roses being held by Ghandi at the funeral of Mother Teresa and I'd still be infracted for it, KOT

Superintendent Gene Hunt

It only bothers you if you let it....

and its fun to be infracted, how else would you know you've crossed that line

Karl 227

Normal people with Infractor guns don't bother me in the slightest, DCI, it's the special needs cases that get on my ****

Superintendent Gene Hunt

That's everyone then

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

All my infractions have been from the webby. I feel quite sad no one hates me enough to infract me

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

coming from chief windowlicker himself

Superintendent Gene Hunt

I'd infract you.... but someone took my Infracticator 3000 off me

Superintendent Gene Hunt

So liking the taste of frosty windows is a crime now then

Devildog

Name and shame Karl.

Otherwise, stop whingeing

Jerome

Well it's not me. I've only ever infracted someone once, and that was a blatant spammer.

Some people's Infractor guns seem to have hair triggers though.

In the military, we call that an ND. Negligent Discharge. Seems approriate somehow...

Devildog

Which socially challenged individual infracted Karl for that ffs?????

edit - that would be one of the special needs cases presumably

mrtheedge2u2

Come on then.... who are the biggest tos.... sorry I mean "Infractors" on here???

Superintendent Gene Hunt

Whoever infracted Karl should also infract me as I called everyone 'special needs'

*awaits infraction*

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

If anythig the infraction system has destroyed the community not made it stronger. Muppets is fubarred these days

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

yup someone infract this spaccer people with special needs should not be allowed near the internet

Superintendent Gene Hunt

No, that's not true.... overall its worked, the trouble is (as karl says) its being abused by some!

Still that's what policy is for

Superintendent Gene Hunt

You try typing with your feckin nose... its snot easy you know!

mrtheedge2u2

I can see the pro's and con's..... but this is my prob....if you are actively participating in a thread and somebody goes nuclear on you then fair enough, infract them... but i do not think window shoppers should infract......

Devildog

Great example of the problem

I doubt very much that SGH was insulted by this, and hence no infraction necessary. Yet some socially challenged poster may assume otherwise.

Its all about context. Something which the infraction system doesn't do very well

Karl 227

Correct, look a post 8

What a bloody joke

apkadb

Does one feel that using the words "window licker" and "spaccer" are acceptable terms for silly people or infracters.

I for one do not.

Superintendent Gene Hunt

Post 8 was a private joke between Karl and myself, it wasn't offensive, I wasn't bothered by it.... so who else has the right to infract him on my behalf??

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

Well old bean good for you.





spacco lover

Superintendent Gene Hunt

"silly people" are you 10 years old?

Karl 227

I'd guess so, but the infractamania will stay for a while yet, until people start protesting by posting elsewhere and using other sites, it's started to happen already but will happen more and more, then the hits will drop, then the advertising revenue will drop, then the infractors will self infract, but by then it may be too late and the palace will crumble, with the princess still inside. Farquar, Farquar, where are you?

Sorry, I drifted off there for a minute, anyway, you get the gist?