View Poll Results: Do you support the ban on smoking in public places?
Voters: 245. You may not vote on this poll
Do you support the ban on smoking?
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I support a partial ban, something not on your poll, so I reckon this "vote" will be somewhat skewed in favour of the no smoking lobby.
A partial ban would be workable, and a lot less draconioan than the mess thats been delivered.
I was never in favour of a ban on pubs that served food etc, which was a crazy idea. But favour premises which wish to allow smoking to apply for *smoking licences* and pay a fat fee for the right to do so, detering the majority from applying.
A partial ban would be workable, and a lot less draconioan than the mess thats been delivered.
I was never in favour of a ban on pubs that served food etc, which was a crazy idea. But favour premises which wish to allow smoking to apply for *smoking licences* and pay a fat fee for the right to do so, detering the majority from applying.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im not so concerned about the health aspects personally...i guess in the long run if objective evidence suggests it saves some lives thats got to be a good thing...
im more bothered about the anti-social aspect to smoking, and the f*cking mess it leaves everywhere...if its a step closer to reducing litter (***-ends, packets, stinking ashtrays, etc) then thatll make me happy...!
im more bothered about the anti-social aspect to smoking, and the f*cking mess it leaves everywhere...if its a step closer to reducing litter (***-ends, packets, stinking ashtrays, etc) then thatll make me happy...!
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dracoro
Well, the poll so far is pretty comprehensive. So the ban was right and is representing the majority of views.
And as mentioned I feel the poll will be a misrepresentation due to the limited options.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Smokers could have CHOSEN not to smoke in pubs. They haven't so there's a ban. It IS democratic. The MAJORITY want the ban so that's what they've got. Democracy in action.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scoobynutta555
The majority of views in the right wing world of scoobynet that is
And as mentioned I feel the poll will be a misrepresentation due to the limited options.
And as mentioned I feel the poll will be a misrepresentation due to the limited options.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most people want a proper NHS and no Taxes in this country too. Where's the democracy in action there?
Democracy in action seems to be your phrase. Seem to remember that Hitler was democratically elected too
Democracy in action seems to be your phrase. Seem to remember that Hitler was democratically elected too
#14
Originally Posted by scoobynutta555
Most people want a proper NHS and no Taxes in this country too. Where's the democracy in action there?
Democracy in action seems to be your phrase. Seem to remember that Hitler was democratically elected too
Democracy in action seems to be your phrase. Seem to remember that Hitler was democratically elected too
Get real.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rik1471
No Taxes - ROFLMAO.
Get real.
Get real.
Im still of the view that an outright ban is not the right solution. I myself would not like to breathe in smoke if I was a non smoker, but that's different to say I'd ban it everywhere and run roughshod over the views of what still makes up over 25% of the adult population, ie smokers.
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nonsense assumption. Most people have enough common sense to realise that such a decision would result in anarchy. We might bitch about our taxes, but most of us do also realise that they are a necessary evil.
#20
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I personally don't like smoking one bit, but I voted no.
I look at it as I would any other kind of pastime. I respect other people's rights to enjoy a ***, I just ask -as I would with anything- that they respect the rights of other people who may not feel the same way.
The total Ban is overkill. Provisions should be made to protect establishment staff, who would otherwise have no choice but to be exposed to the smoke and -where possible- smoking and no-smoking sections be provided to give people a choice. I also think that a ban on smoking in environments that would effectively mean that people couldn't make a decision about whether they wanted to expose themselves to the smoke e.g. on public transport, in elevators etc... is appropriate. That's just plain courtesy.
That would be sufficient.
Ns04
I look at it as I would any other kind of pastime. I respect other people's rights to enjoy a ***, I just ask -as I would with anything- that they respect the rights of other people who may not feel the same way.
The total Ban is overkill. Provisions should be made to protect establishment staff, who would otherwise have no choice but to be exposed to the smoke and -where possible- smoking and no-smoking sections be provided to give people a choice. I also think that a ban on smoking in environments that would effectively mean that people couldn't make a decision about whether they wanted to expose themselves to the smoke e.g. on public transport, in elevators etc... is appropriate. That's just plain courtesy.
That would be sufficient.
Ns04
Last edited by New_scooby_04; 15 February 2006 at 12:54 PM.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not nonsense at all. It's a hypothetical situation, and it demonstrates (if somewhat at the extreme end) what situation you can find yourself in if Majority Rule was in place.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm saying that a majority *wouldn't* support that particular proposal, that's all. Smoking is cuaght up in so many other issues than just majority rule though, it isn't that simple. Public places should be that - places for the public. And since smoking kills people, the public should have the ability to go into public places without the risk of unintentionally exposing themselves to these dangers. It's pretty straightforward in my mind. If segregated, totally smoke-proof areas could be provided which didn't in any way impact non-smokers then i'd have difficulty finding a reason to oppose that, but how on earth would that ever be enforcable, so the option to blanket ban is the only really workable solution in my opinion.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hate smoking and have never smoked myself, but I don't support the ban.
Dracoro: Everyone else (the majority?) could have chosen not to go in pubs that allow smoking. I don't understand why market forces have not driven people away from smokey pubs, forcing them to introduce a ban or close down? Since a majority of pubs allow smoking then I don't understand how the majority are in favour of the ban. Now smoking is banned will pubs see a huge increase in trade? I don't expect so.
Scrappy9: The ban does not apply inside private dwellings so no change for midwives I'm afraid.
Dracoro: Everyone else (the majority?) could have chosen not to go in pubs that allow smoking. I don't understand why market forces have not driven people away from smokey pubs, forcing them to introduce a ban or close down? Since a majority of pubs allow smoking then I don't understand how the majority are in favour of the ban. Now smoking is banned will pubs see a huge increase in trade? I don't expect so.
Scrappy9: The ban does not apply inside private dwellings so no change for midwives I'm afraid.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scoobynutta555
Most people want a proper NHS and no Taxes in this country too. Where's the democracy in action there?
Democracy in action seems to be your phrase. Seem to remember that Hitler was democratically elected too
Democracy in action seems to be your phrase. Seem to remember that Hitler was democratically elected too
B) People who do give up will still spend that £5 a day on something else which will result in income to society and govt.
C) Any revenue lost will be gained from elsewhere, either through differing priorities and separate taxation.
D) The NHS will NOT go without, smoking or no smoking.
Your Hitler argument is irrelevant and non-sensical. Unless, you disagree with democracy of course?
Regardless, I didn't say whether I agree with the ban or not, I'm merely stating the govt. is doing what the majority want. It's that simple. For better or worse, it's democracy in action.
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by New_scooby_04
IProvisions should be made to protect establishment staff, who would otherwise have no choice but to be exposed to the smoke ...
#27
I stopped smoking about 7 months ago but still dont agree with the ban. Should be peoples right to smoke in designated areas in public places and if people still dont like that stay in.
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedking
But they do have a choice, don't work in that establishment. It's just like any other dangerous occupation that might be detrimental to your health, soldier, fireman, tiger mucker outer, bailiff, etc. If the pay is right, people will balance the danger and do the job.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ex'e'er
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedking
But they do have a choice, don't work in that establishment. It's just like any other dangerous occupation that might be detrimental to your health, soldier, fireman, tiger mucker outer, bailiff, etc. If the pay is right, people will balance the danger and do the job.
It doesn't just come down to 'if you pay enough it doesn't matter'.
#30
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedking
But they do have a choice, don't work in that establishment. It's just like any other dangerous occupation that might be detrimental to your health, soldier, fireman, tiger mucker outer, bailiff, etc. If the pay is right, people will balance the danger and do the job.
Some occupations are inherently and unavoidably dangerous by their nature, as you say, if you don't consent to the danger, don't apply. However, the danger -if there is a danger from passive smoking- is not an unavoidable feature of bar work. The risk can be avoided by asking people not to smoke at the bar, as many pubs already do. Inhaling other peoples smoke is not an inherent and unavoidable feature of barwork.
Ns04