Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Manned space-station on the Moon - why??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 January 2004, 11:04 PM
  #1  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

What's all that about then?

Has Bush really got nothing better to spend the money on??

If this isn't politics gone mad, i don't know what is.
Old 09 January 2004, 11:10 PM
  #2  
mart360
Scooby Regular
 
mart360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

nope its just space 1999 5 years late!!!!

i wouldnt mind going up there prehaps its the new guantanamo bay...

cept its on the wrong side of an airlock


mart
Old 09 January 2004, 11:21 PM
  #3  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

Apparently Scoobynet have agreed to buy the first ticket, for ME!

Who would YOU send to the moon? Mr Blair doesn't qualify, OK?

Pete
Old 09 January 2004, 11:22 PM
  #4  
UFO
Scooby Regular
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It's just a feel good factor, only trying to gloss over the fact that he took his country and others to war in his last (this) term!

Not sure if the Americans will see through it though, not being xenophobic there, just suggesting that the majority may think "Oh great we'll get to go and stay on the moon!"
Old 09 January 2004, 11:26 PM
  #5  
boxst
Scooby Regular
 
boxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 11,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

UFO:

Mmmm. Isn't America the place where some incredibly high proportion of the population has never left the country? So I'm not too sure they would want to go to the moon ...

Steve.
Old 09 January 2004, 11:30 PM
  #6  
imlach
Scooby Regular
 
imlach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 5,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Nah...it's so they can put their only US Embassy on the moon, so the only way to get an entry visa is to visit their sole Embassy

When will we have the 1st suicide bomber on the moon?
Old 09 January 2004, 11:32 PM
  #7  
UFO
Scooby Regular
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Steve:

It's the novelty factor though, not really the fact that they will go or could go, even if they wanted to (as I imagine health issues will stop most).

Trending Topics

Old 09 January 2004, 11:35 PM
  #8  
andrew6321
Scooby Regular
 
andrew6321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

its a political diversion designed to deflect TV airtime from his opponents...it has sod-all to do with any real urge to go there, scientific or otherwise....

his dad did the same thing in election year....so did Clinton...
Old 09 January 2004, 11:39 PM
  #9  
TonyNesta
Scooby Regular
 
TonyNesta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

They need to get up there asap before someone else does and doesn't find any evidence of their 'first' trip in 1969. They'll need to take some flags, moon rover, and make loads of footprints to make it look convincing.

Bush is bricking it in case someone gets up there and proves the previous trips were all pretend.

T
Old 09 January 2004, 11:40 PM
  #10  
akshay67
Scooby Regular
 
akshay67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Unfortunately Americans will just say 'Wow, that's so cool, dooooode...I'm a gana vote Bush in the next election!'
Old 09 January 2004, 11:40 PM
  #11  
pslewis
Scooby Regular
 
pslewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Old Codgers Home
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Red face

My brother-in-law watched them filmimg it all in Bray Studios - his house backed onto them!

Pete
Old 09 January 2004, 11:40 PM
  #12  
UFO
Scooby Regular
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

...so did Clinton...
You mean *cough* erectoral year */cough*

Old 09 January 2004, 11:44 PM
  #13  
andrew6321
Scooby Regular
 
andrew6321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

that's the one...

space programs & sex scandals - both excellent TV for the great American public....
Old 09 January 2004, 11:46 PM
  #14  
UFO
Scooby Regular
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not forgetting an appearance on Jerry Springer, almost a dead cert then isn't it?


Old 10 January 2004, 12:41 AM
  #15  
BuRR
Scooby Regular
 
BuRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Was Wakefield, now London
Posts: 5,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I say yes.

I need a nightwatchman to look after that acre I bought a couple of years ago
Old 10 January 2004, 08:10 AM
  #16  
class_A
Scooby Regular
 
class_A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: elsewhere
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

As a geek, I'm actually quite excited. A moon base will serve as a useful training ground for a manned mission to Mars. It will force the development of a cheap spacecraft to replace the shuttle. Hopefully we will see a small, comfortable craft designed for people with a specific rocket for cargo, rather than the compromise that we have today called the Space Shuttle.

A moon base could eventually allow a spacecraft production facility to exist outside the Earth's atmosphere, meaning less fuel required onboard and therefore lower costs. It also allows other types of fuel and engine to be used, with less of a risk to the general population (ie. radioactive fuel).

With the XPrize contenders getting nearer to launch, and a moon base as a destination, the commercialisation and therefore cost reduction of space travel hopefully isn't too far away.

Plus, it isn't my tax that will be paying for it!
Old 10 January 2004, 08:58 AM
  #17  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

PR. Pure PR. He wants to be re-elected, so he's gunning for public appeal. He must reckon the prospect of having America's 'prestige' raised by embarking on such grandiose projects must be very appealing to the voters.

I reckon it serves a two-fold purpose. Firstly, the aforementioned electoral reasons. Secondly, to distract the American public from the Iraqi situation.
Old 10 January 2004, 09:34 AM
  #18  
matrix
Scooby Regular
 
matrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Swansea
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

That would mean that somebody has to go to the moon this time and not fake it like they did with Neil Amstrong and Buzz Aldrin the second men NOT to walk on the moon. Jules Verne was the first one NOT to do that.

[Edited by matrix - 1/10/2004 9:35:57 AM]
Old 10 January 2004, 10:16 AM
  #19  
Crapaud62
Scooby Regular
 
Crapaud62's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 4,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The super new telescopes are supposed to be able to accurately see the moons surface these days. Do they ever pick up traces of bits from the Appollo missions eg lunar rover etc?

Mind you if it was a Rover it would have rusted away by now
Old 10 January 2004, 10:39 AM
  #20  
super_si
Scooby Regular
 
super_si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

makes you wonder if he'll fund nasa for a new shuttle?
Old 10 January 2004, 10:56 AM
  #21  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

This BBC story suggests he says he will, yes.

Officials say Mr Bush intends to reinvigorate the US space programme following setbacks such as the Columbia shuttle disaster.
Old 10 January 2004, 11:17 AM
  #22  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Post

Can anyone say bankrupt? The guy is storing up enormous debt for that country as it is, projects like this are going to make the current deficit look like pennies. What would happen if the world bank turned round and asked for their money back? He would be OK but the vast majority of Americans would be in the ****ter, which would mean we would be too.
Old 10 January 2004, 11:53 AM
  #23  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Thumbs down

It's a bit like the Argies declaring war on us: it'll deflect people's attention away from the precarious state of their economy, but it'll all end in tears IMHO.
Alcazar
Old 10 January 2004, 12:41 PM
  #24  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The Moon will apply to join Europe then, so we can all subsidise it!

Les
Old 10 January 2004, 04:12 PM
  #25  
Freak
Scooby Regular
 
Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: JFK/LHR
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

i just hope they use the one acre of land i own on the moon... my rent isnt cheap
Old 10 January 2004, 04:19 PM
  #26  
Katana
Scooby Regular
 
Katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I still say China would be the first to have a moonbase. I mean, they've already got mooncakes..
Old 10 January 2004, 05:41 PM
  #27  
scoobynutta555
Scooby Regular
 
scoobynutta555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Good to see such positive comments

Amazing comments from 'experts' on here purporting to know that the moon landings were fake.

Obviously it is electioneering, but there is a serious point that we should be furthering our reach and understanding of at least our solar system.

Yes it will be expensive, but IMO the benefits can't be assessed on dry accounting alone.

Only downpoint I can see is that it won't apparently be a multi- nation task, but a single nation one. Once a foothold is established on the moon by the US they'll regard it as the 51st state.

Also, I'd say the US is more than a bit concerned that the Chinese are making headway in their space program. I'd sooner Americans be up there 'mooning' than the Chinese.

Old 10 January 2004, 06:15 PM
  #28  
gljam
Scooby Regular
 
gljam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: evesham, worcester
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Nah it'll be the 52nd state, we're the 51st with good ol' governor Blair looking after us
Old 10 January 2004, 06:20 PM
  #29  
sti555
Scooby Regular
 
sti555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Manned space-station on the Moon - why??

Simple the earth is running out of cheese....

nasa are also looking into a new source of mars...

Don't think were running out of loo roll yet, I've heard theres loads round uranus!

LOL!!

I'll get my coat ahem..

Old 10 January 2004, 07:00 PM
  #30  
fizzled
Scooby Regular
 
fizzled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

they will have to be quick . BUY 1 ACRE OF THE MOON $ . seen the ads?


Quick Reply: Manned space-station on the Moon - why??



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 AM.